The potential benefits of teacher leadership are widely acknowledged; however, the conceptualization of this construct is in need of theoretical development and analytic clarification. The purpose of this mixed methodology study was to operationalize distinct types of teacher leadership into an organized typology, based on case studies of teacher leaders in a science education project. In addition, through confirmatory factor analysis, evidence for factors representing the distinct types of teacher leadership identified in the typology was found in a general teacher leadership survey. Implications for teacher leadership research and practice are discussed.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy.New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
Acker-HocevarM., & TouchtonD. (1999). A Model of Power as Social. Relationships: Teacher Leaders Describe the Phenomena of Effective Agency in Practice. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 1999.
3.
AndersonJ. R. (1993). Development of expertise. In Readings in knowledge acquisition and learning (pp. 61–77). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
4.
AshR. C., & PersallJ. M. (2000). The principal as chief learning officer: Developing teacher leaders.NASSP Bulletin84(616), 15–22.
5.
BallD. L., & CohenD. K. (1996). Reform by the book: What is: Or might be: The role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform?Educational Researcher, 6–14.
6.
BrykA. S., SebringP. B., AllensworthE., EastonJ. Q., & LuppescuS. (2010). Organizing schools for improvement: Lessons from.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
7.
CoburnC. E. (2003). Rethinking scale: Moving beyond numbers to deep and lasting change.Educational Researcher,32(6), 3–12.
8.
CoburnC. E., & SteinM. K. (2010). Research and practice in education: Building alliances, bridging the divide.Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
9.
CosnerS. (2009). Building organizational capacity through trust.Educational Administration Quarterly,45(2), 248–291.
10.
CrabtreeB. F., & MillerW. L. (Eds.). (1999). Doing qualitative, research.New York, NY: Sage Publications.
11.
CurtisR. (2013). Finding a New Way: Leveraging Teacher Leadership to Meet Unprecedented Demands.Aspen Institute.
12.
DanielsonC. (2007). The Many Faces of Leadership.Educational Leadership,65(1), 14–19.
13.
Darling-HammondL., BullmasterM. L., & CobbV. L. (1995). Rethinking teacher leadership through professional development schools.The Elementary School Journal, 87–106.
14.
DatnowA., HubbardL., & MehanH. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many.New York, NY: Psychology Press.
15.
Dedoose. (2015). Version 6.1.18, web application for managing, analyzing, and presenting qualitative and mixed method research data.Los Angeles, CA: Socio Cultural Research Consultants, LLC (www.dedoose.com).
16.
DenzinN. K. (1978). Triangulation: A case for methodological evaluation and combination. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), Sociological methods: A sourcebook (pp. 339–357). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies.
17.
EricssonK. A., KrampeR. T., & Tesch-RömerC. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.Psychological Review,100(3) 363.
18.
FullanM. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents.Educational Leadership,50, 12.
19.
GlaserB. G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analysis.Mill Valley: Sociology Press.
20.
GlaserB. G. (2002). Conceptualization: On theory and theorizing using grounded theory.International Journal of Qualitative Methods,1(2), 23–38.
21.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory.London: Weidenfeld and Nicholson,24(25), 288–304.
22.
GoldsteinD. (2014). The teacher wars: A history of America's most embattled, profession.New York, NY: Penguin Random House LLC.
23.
GonzalesS., & LambertL. (2014). Teacher leadership in professional development schools: Emerging conceptions, identities, and practices.Journal of School Leadership,11(1), 6–24.
24.
HanuscinD. L., RebelloC. M., & SinhaS. (2012). Supporting the Development of Science Teacher Leaders-Where Do We Begin?Science Education,21(1), 12–18.
25.
HarrisA., DayC., HopkinsD., HadfieldM., HargreavesA., & ChapmanC. (2013). Effective leadership for school improvement, London, England: Routledge.
26.
HartA. W. (1995). Reconceiving school leadership: Emergent views.The Elementary School Journal,96(1) 9–28.
27.
HordS. M. (Ed.). (2004). Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
28.
HoweA. C., & StubbsH. S. (2003). From science teacher to teacher leader: Leadership development as meaning making in a community of practice.Science Education,87(2), 281–297.
29.
HubermanM., & MilesM. B. (2002). The qualitative researcher's companion.Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
HuL., & BentlerP. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification.Psychological Methods,3(4), 424.
31.
IngersollR. M., & StrongM. (2011). The impact of induction and mentoring programs for beginning teachers a critical review of the research.Review of Educational Research,81(2), 201–233.
32.
KatzenmeyerM., & MollerG. (2009). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
33.
KlineR. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural, equation modeling.New York, NY: Guilford Press.
34.
LankfordH., LoebS., McEachinA., MilerL. C., & WyckoffJ. (2014). Who enters teaching? Encouraging evidence that the status of teaching is improving.Educational Researcher,43(9) 444–453.
35.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,10(4), 451–479.
36.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school.Journal of Educational Administration,38(2), 112–129.
37.
LiebermanA., & MilerL. (2005). Teachers as leaders.The Educational Forum.,69, 151–162.
38.
ManginM. M., & StoelingaS. E. (Eds.). (2008). Effective teacher leadership: Using research to inform and reform.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
39.
MatsunagaM. (2010). How to Factor Analyze Your Data Right: Do's, Don'ts, and How To’ s.International Journal of Psychological. Research3(1), 97–110.
40.
National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National. Science Education. Standards.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
41.
National Research Council (NRC). (2013). A framework for K–12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and. core ideas.Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
42.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
43.
OvandoM. N. (1996). Teacher leadership: Opportunities and challenges.Planning and Changing,27, 30–44.
44.
PattersonJ. A., & MarshallC. (2014). Making sense of policy paradoxes: A case study of teacher leadership.Journal of School Leadership,11, 372–398.
45.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative, evaluation and research, methods.New York, NY: SAGE Publications, Inc.
46.
PauluN., & WintersK. (1998). Teachers leading the. way. Voices From the National Teacher Forum.
47.
PetersonP. L., & ClarkC. M. (1978). Teachers’ reports of their cognitive processes during teaching.American Educational Research Journal,75(4), 555–565.
48.
RyanJ. (2006). Inclusive leadership and social justice for schools.Leadership and Policy in Schools,5(1), 3–17.
49.
SalazarY. C.Jr. (2010). Teacher to leader: A mixed methods approach to investigating Teacher leadership in program improvement secondary schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). San Diego State University, California.
50.
ShavelsonR. J., & StemP. (1981). Research on teachers’ pedagogical thoughts, judgments, decisions, and behavior.Review of Educational Research.,57(4), 455–498.
51.
SherrillJ. A. (1999). Preparing teachers for leadership roles in the 21st century.Theory into Practice,38(1), 56–61.
52.
SilvaD., GimbertB., & NolanJ. (2000). Sliding the doors: Locking and unlocking possibilities for teacher leadership.The Teachers College Record,102(4), 779–804.
53.
SmylieM. A., ConleyS., & MarksH. M. (2002). Exploring new approaches to teacher leadership for school improvement.Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education,101(1), 162–188.
54.
SmylieM. A., LazarusV., & Brownlee-ConyersJ. (1996). Instructional outcomes of school-based participative decision making.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,18(3), 181–198.
55.
SpillaneJ. P., DiamondJ. B., WalkerL. J., HalversonR., & JitaL. (2001). Urban school leadership for elementary science instruction: Identifying and activating resources in an undervalued school subject.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38(8), 918–940.
56.
SpillaneJ. P., & KimC. M. (2012). An exploratory analysis of formal school leaders’ positioning in instructional advice and information networks in elementary schools.American Journal of Education,119(1), 73–102.
57.
StollL., BolamR., McMahonA., WallaceM., & ThomasS. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature.Journal of Educational Change7(4), 221–258.
58.
TalbertJ. E., & McLaughlinM. W. (1994). Teacher professionalism in local school contexts.American Journal of Education,102, 123–153.
59.
TaylorD. L., & BogotchI. E. (1994). School-level effects of teachers’ participation in decision making.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,16(3), 302–319.
60.
TrotterY. D. (2006). Adult learning theories: Impacting professional development programs.Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin,72(2), 8.
61.
WennerJ. A., & CampbellD. T. (in press). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature.Review of Educational Research.
62.
YinR. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods.New York, NY: SAGE Publications.
63.
York-BarrJ., & DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship.Review of Educational Research,74(3), 255–316.
