This study investigates whether and how principals implementing Instructional Leadership Teams (ILTs) were able to share decision-making authority with team members and how team members perceived this authority. Having interviewed and observed ILT members in four, in-district charter schools in a large northeastern city I find that principals had great difficultly releasing authority to team members and deployed a variety of “moves” to keep control over decision-making. Team members also appeared to perceive their authority as subordinate to the principal and embraced a hierarchical model of school leadership with an emphasis on formal authority and autocratic decision-making
BlaseJ., & KirbyP. C. (2008). Bringing out the best in teachers: What effective principals do.Corwin Press.
6.
BlegenM. B., & KennedyC. (2000). Teachers and principals leading together.NASSP Bulletin,84(1), 1–6.
7.
BolesK., & TroenV.Teacher leadership in a professional development school. Paper presented at the American Research Association Annual Conference, New Orleans, Lousiana, April 4, 1998.
8.
BoyatzisR. E. (1998). Translating qualitative information.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
9.
ChaplainR. P. (2001). Stress and job satisfaction among primary head teachers.Educational Management & Administration,29(2), 197–215.
ConleyD. T., & GoldmanP. (1994). Ten propositions for facilitative leadership. In MurphyJ., & LouisK. S. (Eds). Reshaping the principalship: Insights from transformational reform efforts, 237–262.
14.
CoplandM. A. (2003). Leadership of inquiry: Building and sustaining capacity for school improvement.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(4), 375–395.
15.
CoyleM. (1997). Teacher leadership vs. school management: Flatten the hierarchies.Teacher Leadership,70(5), 236–239.
16.
Darling-HammondL., & GoodwinA. L. (1993). Progress towards professionalism in teaching. In Challenges and Achievements of American Education: The 1993 ASCD Yearbook, (pp. 19–52) CaweltiG. (Ed.). Alexandria, Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
17.
DatnowA., & CastellanoM. E. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in Success for All schools.Educational Administration Quarterly,37(2), 219–249.
18.
DavisS., Darling-HammondL., LaPointeM., & MeyersonD. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals (Review of Research).Stanford, CA: Stanford Educational Leadership Institute
19.
DeLeonA. G. (2006). The school leadership crisis: Have schools principals been left behind?Carnegie Reported (Vol. 4): Carnegie Corporation of New York.
20.
DonaldsonM., JohnsonS. M., KirkpatrickC. L., MarinellW. H., SteeleJ. L., & SzczesiulS. A. (2008). Angling for access, bartering for change: How second stage teachers experience differentiated roles in schools.Teachers College Record,110(5), 1088–1114.
21.
DonmoyerR., & WagstaffJ. G. (1990). Principals can be effective managers and instructional leaders.Nassp Bulletin,74(525), 20–29.
22.
EdmondsR. (1979). Effective schools for the urban poor.Educational Leadership,37(1), 15–24.
23.
ElmoreR. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership.Washington, DC: The Albert Shanker Institute.
FinniganK. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high- stakes accountability policies.Leadership and Policy in Schools,9(2), 161–189.
27.
Fletcher CampbellF. (2003). Promotion to middle management: some practitioners’ perceptions.Educational Research,45(1), 1–15.
28.
FletcherJ. K., & KauferK. (2003). Shared leadership: Paradox and possibility. In PearceC. J., & CongerC. (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the how and whys of leadership (pp. 21–47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
FullanM. (2001). Leading in a culture of change.San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
30.
GrissomJ. A., LoebS., & MasterB. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school Leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals.Educational Researcher,42(8), 433–444.
31.
GrossB., JochimA., ConawayC., SchwartzN., KeeslerV., DempseyK., HowleyC., & KohlerP. (2014). The SEA of the Future: Building Agency Capacity for Evidence-Based Policymaking.Center for Reinventing Public Education.Seattle, WA.
32.
GunterH., HallD., & BraggJ. (2013). Distributed Leadership: A study in knowledge production.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,41(5), 555–580.
33.
HackmanJ. R. (2002). Leading teams: Setting the stage for great performances.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
34.
HackmanJ. R., & EdmondsonA. C. (2008). Groups as agents of change.Handbook of organization development, 167–186.
35.
HallingerP., & MurphyJ. (1987). Assessing and developing principal instructional leadership.Educational Leadership,45(1), 54–61.
36.
HallingerP. (1992). The evolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional to transformational leaders.Journal of Educational Administration,30(3), 35–48.
37.
HallingerP. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership.Cambridge Journal of education,33(3), 329–352.
38.
HallingerP. (2011). Leadership for learning: lessons from 40 years of empirical research.Journal of Educational Administration,49(2), 125–142.
39.
HallingerP., & HeckR. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning.School Leadership and Management,30(2), 95–110.
40.
HamiltonL. S., StecherB. M., MarshJ. A., McCombsJ. S., RobynA., RussellJ. L. (2007). Standards-based accountability under No Child Left Behind: Experiences of teachers and administrators in three states.Santa Monica, CA: RAND corporation.
HarrisA., LeithwoodK., DayC., SammonsP., & HopkinsD. (2007). Distributed leadership and organizational change: Reviewing the evidence.Journal of Educational Change,8(4), 337–347.
43.
HarrisA. (2008). Distributed leadership: According to the evidence.Journal of Educational Administration,46(2), 172–188.
44.
HertlingE. (2001). Retaining Principals.Clearinghouse on Educational Management ERIC Digest, 147.
45.
HeckR.H., & HallingerP. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement,American Education Research Journal,46(3), 626–658.
46.
HessF. M., & KellyA. P. (2007). Learning to lead: What gets taught in principal-preparation programs.Teachers College Record,109(1), 244–274.
47.
HigginsM., YoungL., WeinerJ., & WlodarczykS. (2009). Leading teams of leaders: What helps team member learning?The Phi Delta Kappan,91(4), 41–45.
48.
HigginsM., WeinerJ., & YoungL. (2012). Implementation teams: A new lever for change.Journal of Organizational Behavior,33(3), 366–388.
49.
HonigM. I. (2009). No small thing: School district central office bureaucracies and the implementation of new small autonomous schools initiatives. AmericanEducational Research Journal,46(2), 387–422.
50.
HonigM. I. (2012). District central office leadership as teaching: How central office administrators support principals’ development as instructional leaders.Educational Administration Quarterly,48(4), 733–774.
51.
HopkinsD. (2001). ‘Think Tank’ Report to Governing Council.Nottingham: National College for School Leadership.
52.
HulpiaH., DevosG., & RosseelY. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers’ and teacher leaders’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,20(3), 291–317.
53.
HulpiaH., DevosG., & Van KeerH. (2011). The relation between school leadership from a distributed perspective and teachers’ organizational commitment examining the source of the leadership function.Educational Administration Quarterly,47(5), 728–771.
54.
JacksonB. L., & KelleyC. (2002). Exceptional and innovative programs in educational leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,38(2), 192–212.
55.
KatzenmeyerG., & MollerM. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Leadership development for teachers.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
56.
LambertL. (2002). A framework for shared leadership.Educational Leadership,59(8), 37–40.
57.
LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A replication.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,10(4), 451–479.
58.
LeithwoodK., LouisK. S., AndersonS., & WahlstromK. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning.New York: The Wallace Foundation.
59.
LeithwoodK., & BeattyB. (2007). Leading with teacher emotions in mind.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
LeithwoodK., MascallB., & StraussT. (Eds.) (2009). New perspectives on an old idea: A short history of the old idea.Distributed leadership according to the evidence (pp. 1–14). New York, NY: Routledge.
62.
LittleJ. W. (1990). The persistence of privacy: Autonomy and initiative in teachers’ professional lives.The Teacher's College Record,91(4), 510–536.
63.
LordB., CressK., & MillerB. (2003). Teacher leadership as classroom support: The challenges of scale and feedback in mathematics and science education reform, Education Development Center, Inc.
64.
LortieD. C. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study.Chicago, IL: University Press.
65.
LouisK.S., DretzkeB., & WahlstromK. (2010). How does leadership affect student achievement? Results from a national US survey.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,21(3), 315–336.
66.
ManginM. (2008). The influence of organizational design on instructional teacher leadership. In ManginM., & StoelingaS.Effective teacher leadership using research to inform and reform.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
67.
MarksH. M., & PrintyS. M. (2003). Principal leadership and school performance: Integrating transformational and instructional leadership.Educational Administration Quarterly,39(3), 370–397.
68.
MartinK., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2004). A middle school strives to achieve team leadership through opposition and uncertainty. In ChrispeelsJ. (Ed.). Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership (pp. 104–131). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
69.
MaxwellJ. A. (1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
70.
MayrowetzD., MurphyJ., LouisK., & SmylieM. A. (2007). Distributed leadership as work redesign: Retrofitting the job characteristics model.Leadership and Policy in Schools,6(1), 69–101.
71.
MilesM. S., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook of new methods.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
72.
MurphyJ. (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
73.
OgawaR. T., & BossertS. T. (1995). Leadership as an organizational quality.Educational Administration Quarterly,31(2), 224–243.
74.
PearceC. L., & CongerJ. A. (Eds.) (2003). Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
75.
PeckC., & ReitzugU. C. (2014). School turnaround fever: The paradoxes of a historical practice promoted as a new reform.Urban Education,49(1), 8–38.
76.
PooleW. (1995). Reconstructing the Teacher-Administrator Relationship to Achieve Systemic Change.Journal of School Leadership,5(6), 565–96.
77.
PortinB. S., KnappM. S., AlejanoC. R., MarzolfE. (2006). Roles, responsibilities, and authority of school leaders: Patterns in current research, theory, and practice. State of the field monograph published by the University of Washington Center for Teaching and Policy and The Wallace Foundation.
78.
ResnickL. B., & HallM. W. (2001). The Principles of Learning: Study tools for educators.Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, Institute for Learning.
79.
RobinsonV. M., LloydC. A., & RoweK. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types.Educational Administration Quarterly,44(5), 635–674.
80.
SashkinM., & MorrisW. C. (1984). Organizational behavior: Concepts and experiences.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Reston Publishing Company.
81.
SeidmanI. (2006). Interviewing as qualitative research.New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
82.
ShiuS., ChrispeelsJ. H., & DoerrR. E. (2004). Evolving roles and sharing leadership: The path of one leadership team. In ChrispeelsJ. (Ed.). Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership (pp. 132–160). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
83.
SmithK. K., & BergD. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict paralysis, and movement in group dynamics.San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
84.
SmylieM. A. (1996). Research on teacher leadership: Assessing the state of the art. In BiddleB. J., GoodT. L., & GoodsonI. F. (Eds.). International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 521–592). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academy.
85.
SpauldingD. T., & SmithG. (2012). Instructional coaches and the instructional leadership team.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
86.
SpillaneJ. P., & DiamondJ. (Eds.) (2007). Taking a distributed perspective.Distributed leadership in practice.New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.
87.
SpillaneJ. P., HalversonR., & DiamondJ. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective.Educational Researcher,30(3), 23–28.
88.
SpillaneJ. P., DiamondJ. B., & JitaL. (2003). Leading instruction: The distribution of leadership for instruction.Journal of Curriculum Studies,35(5), 533–543.
89.
SupovitzJ., SirinidesP., & MayH. (2009). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning.Educational Administration Quarterly,46(1), 31–56.
90.
SupovitzJ. A., & TognattaN. (2013). The impact of distributed leadership on collaborative team decision making.Leadership and Policy in Schools,12(2), 101–121.
91.
Van SellM., BriefA. P., & SchulerR. S. (1981). Role conflict and role ambiguity: Integration of the literature and directions for future research.Human Relations,34(1), 43–71.
92.
WagemanR., NunesD. A., BurrussJ. A., & HackmanJ. R. (2008). Senior leadership teams: What it takes to make them great.Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
93.
WahlstromK., LouisK. S., LeithwoodK., & AndersonS. (2010). Investigating the links toimproved student learning.Minneapolis: Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement.
94.
WeinerJ. (2011). Finding common ground: Teacher leaders and principals speak out about teacher leadership.Journal of School Leadership,21(1), 7–41.
95.
WeinerJ. M. (2014). Disabling conditions: Investigating instructional leadership teams in action.Journal of Educational Change,15(3), 253–280.
96.
WheelwrightS., & ClarkeK. (1992). Revolutionizing product development: Quantum leaps in speed, efficiency, and quality.New York, NY: Free Press.
97.
YepM., & ChrispeelsJ. H. (2004). Sharing leadership: Principal perceptions. In ChrispeelsJ. (Ed.). Learning to lead together: The promise and challenge of sharing leadership (pp. 163–192). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
98.
York-BarrJ., & DukeK. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship.Review of Educational Research,74(3), 255–316.
99.
YuH., LeithwoodK., & JantziD. (2002). The effects of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment to change in Hong Kong.Journal of Educational Administration,40(4), 368–389.
