In this essay, we focus on methodological issues that reviewers and editors commonly encounter when evaluating empirical articles in scholarship of teaching and learning in management education. We organize our discussion around three stages—design, analysis, and reporting. The essay identifies which types of issues are likely to receive rejection, and which issues can be addressed in the subsequent reviews of the manuscript. We provide authors with some suggestions on how to address these issues in their research.
AllenD. B.FukamiC. V.WittmerD. P. (2021). A course on the future of work: Building the Scaffold while standing on it. Journal of Management Education, 46(1), 178–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920983839
2.
AndersonV.ElliottC.CallahanJ. L. (2021). Power, powerlessness, and journal ranking lists: The marginalization of fields of practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 20(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2019.0037
3.
AntonakisJ.BendahanS.JacquartP.LaliveR. (2014). Causality and endogeneity: Problems and solutions. In DayD. V. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of leadership and organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 93–117). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199755615.013.007
4.
ArbaughJ.HwangA. (2013). Uses of multivariate analytical techniques in online and blended business education: An assessment of current practice and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management Education, 37(2), 229–260.
5.
AshkanasyN. M. (2010). Publishing today is more difficult than ever. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 1–3.
6.
BaconD. R.StewartK. A.SilverW. S. (1999). Lessons from the best and worst student team experiences: How a teacher can make the difference. Journal of Management Education, 23(5), 467–488. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256299902300503
7.
BagozziR. P.EdwardsJ. R. (1998). A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 1(1), 45–87.
8.
CampbellD. T.StanleyJ. C. (2015). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Ravenio books.
9.
CookT. D. (2015). Quasi-experimental design. In P. C. Flood & Y. Freeney (Eds.,) Wiley encyclopedia of management (pp. 1–2). Wiley.
10.
CookT. D.CampbellD. T.ShadishW. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
11.
De LeeuwJ.MeijerE.GoldsteinH. (2008). Handbook of multilevel analysis. Springer.
12.
HalfhillT. R.NielsenT. M. (2007). Quantifying the “softer side” of management education: An example using teamwork competencies. Journal of Management Education, 31(1), 64–80.
13.
HillA. D.JohnsonS. G.GrecoL. M.O’BoyleE. H.WalterS. L. (2021). Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management, 47(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320960533
14.
KangH. (2021). Sample size determination and power analysis using the G*Power software. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions, 18, 17. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.17
15.
KolbA. Y.KolbD. A. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4(2), 193–212.
16.
LuthansK. W.LuthansB. C.ChaffinT. D. (2019). Refining grit in academic performance: The mediational role of psychological capital. Journal of Management Education, 43(1), 35–61.
17.
MaloniM. J.GligorD. M.BlumentrittT.GligorN. (2021). Fear or competition? Antecedents to U.S. business student immigration attitudes. Journal of Management Education, 46(4), 715–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211065623
18.
MaloniM. J.SmithS. D.NapshinS. (2011). A methodology for building faculty support for the United Nations principles for responsible management education. Journal of Management Education, 36(3), 312–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562911430310
19.
PattenM. L.NewhartM. (2017). Understanding research methods: An overview of the essentials. Routledge.
20.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.PodsakoffN. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
21.
ReedR. R.WagonerH. P. V.CropanzanoR.JenningsT. M. (2023). Assessing the efficacy of online learning in disparate business subjects: Lessons from distributed practice and social learning theory. Journal of Management Education, 23(2), 88–103.
22.
RingJ. K.KellermannsF. W.BarnettT.PearsonA. W.PearsonR. A. (2012). The use of a web-based course management system: Causes and performance effects. Journal of Management Education, 37(6), 854–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562912459853
23.
SpectorP. E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105284955
24.
SroufeR. (2020). Business schools as living labs: Advancing sustainability in management education. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 726–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920951590
25.
StickneyL. T.BentoR. F.AggarwalA.AdlakhaV. (2019). Online higher education: Faculty satisfaction and its antecedents. Journal of Management Education, 43(5), 509–542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562919845022
26.
TaylorP. C.MedinaM. (2011). Educational research paradigms: From positivism to pluralism. College Research Journal, 1(1), 1–16.
27.
WestermanJ. W.NowickiM. D.PlanteD. (2002). Fit in the classroom: Predictors of student performance and satisfaction in management education. Journal of Management Education, 26(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/105256290202600102
