To address deficiencies in STEM and sustainability in business management and intra-university curricula, we developed and implemented an interdisciplinary STEM-based sustainability curriculum at a university in the Western United States. Six classes participated in curricular efforts including in-person and online sections of a business management course, in-person and online sections of a general elective STEM course, and a matched control course for each (n = 214). We systematically designed, developed, and implemented curricular interventions—multi-week STEM-based business sustainability modules—using the case teaching method. A comprehensive evaluation with pre- and post-tests was conducted to assess student sustainability cognition and affect. Significant results emerged for sustainability cognition including the environmental, social, and economic dimensions of sustainability. Counterintuitively, student sustainability affect did not improve. However, sustainability cognition and affect were significantly correlated on the post-test for treatment students, an indication that cognitive and affective changes share the same directionality. Discussion, implications, limitations, and future research directions are provided.
AjzenI.JoyceN.SheikhS.CoteN. G. (2011). Knowledge and the prediction of behavior: The role of information accuracy in the theory of planned behavior. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 33, 101–117.
2.
AllenM. W. (2016). Strategic communication for sustainable organizations – Theory and practice. Springer.
3.
AndréR. (2020). Teaching climate leadership: Promoting integrative learning in courses on strong sustainability. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 766–793.
4.
Annan-DiabF.MolinariC. (2017). Interdisciplinarity: Practical approach to advancing education for sustainability and for the sustainable development goals. The International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 73–83.
5.
Aragon-CorreaJ. A.MarcusA. A.RiveraJ. E.KenworthyA. L. (2017). Sustainability management teaching resources and the challenge of balancing planet, people, and profits. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 16(3), 469–483.
AtavE.AltunoğluB. D.SönmezS. (2015). The determination of the environmental attitudes of secondary education students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 1391–1396.
8.
BagleyC. E.SulkowskiA. J.NelsonJ. S.WaddockS.ShrivastavaP. (2020). A path to developing more insightful business school graduates: A systems-based, experimental approach to integrating law, strategy, and sustainability. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 19, 541–568. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2018.0036
9.
BennS.DunphyD. (2009). Action research as an approach to integrating sustainability into MBA programs. Journal of Management Education, 33(3), 276–295.
10.
BeringerA.WrightT.MaloneL. (2008). Sustainability in higher education in Atlantic Canada. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 48–67.
11.
BoleyB. B. (2011). Sustainability in hospitality and tourism education: Towards an integrated curriculum. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 23(4), 22–31.
12.
BorregoM.HendersonC. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
15.
ColeR.SniderB. (2019). Managing in turbulent times: The impact of sustainability in management education on current and future business leaders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210(10), 1622–1634.
CraigC. A.SayersE. P.FengS.KinghornB. (2019). The impact of climate and weather on a small tourism business: A wSWOT case study. Entrepreneurship Education and Pedagogy, 2(3), 255–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515127419829399
18.
DavidF. R.DavidF. R. (2016). Strategic management: A competitive advantage approach, concepts and cases (Global ed.). Pearson.
19.
DaymontT.BlauG. (2008). Student performance in online and traditional sections of an undergraduate management course. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(3), 275–294.
20.
DunlapR. E.Van LiereK. D.MertigA. G.JonesR. E. (2000). New trends in measuring environmental attitudes: Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.
21.
EpsteinS. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709–724.
22.
EpsteinS. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In MillonT.LernerM. J. (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, volume 5: Personality and social psychology (pp. 159–184). Wiley & Sons.
23.
FigueiróP. S.RauffletE. (2015). Sustainability in higher education: A systematic review with focus on management education. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 22–33.
24.
GarvinD. A. (2007). Teaching executives and teaching MBAs: Reflections on the case method. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(3), 364–374.
25.
GeorgeG.Howard-GrenvilleJ.JoshiA.TihanyiL. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.
26.
GilbertzS. J.HallD. M. (2022). Bringing sustainability to the ground level: Competing demands in the Yellowstone River Valley (HoffmanA. J. Foreword by.) Business Expert Express.
27.
HarrisA. D.McGregorJ. C.PerencevichE. N.FurunoJ. P.ZhuJ.PetersonD. E.FinkelsteinJ. (2006). The use and interpretation of quasi-experimental studies in medical informatics. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(1), 16–23.
28.
HeerenA. J.SinghA. S.ZwickleA.KoontzT. M.SlagleK. M.McCreeryA. C. (2016). Is sustainability knowledge half the battle? An examination of sustainability knowledge, attitudes, norms, and efficacy to understand sustainable behaviours. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 17(5), 613–632.
29.
HopkinsonP.JamesP. (2010). Practical pedagogy for embedding ESD in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curricula. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(4), 365–379.
30.
HoudeJ. (2007). Analogically situated experiences: Creating insight through novel contexts. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(3), 321–331.
31.
KrathwohlD. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212–218.
32.
KuhG. D.KinzieJ.BuckleyJ. A.BridgesB. K.HayekJ. C. (2007). Piecing together the student success puzzle: Research, propositions, and recommendations. Jossey-Bass.
33.
KurlandN. B.MichaudK. E. H.BestM.WohldmannE.CoxH.PontikisK.VasishthA. (2010). Overcoming silos: The role of an interdisciplinary course in shaping a sustainability network. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 457–476.
34.
LidgrenA.RodheH.HuisinghD. (2006). A systemic approach to incorporate sustainability into university courses and curricula. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 797–809.
35.
MontielI.Antolin-LopezR.GalloP. J. (2018). Emotions and sustainability: A literary genre-based framework for environmental sustainability management education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 17(2), 155–183.
NelmsC.AllenM. W.CraigC. A.RiggsS. (2017). Who is the adolescent environmentalist? Environmental attitudes, identity, media usage and communication orientation. Environmental Communication, 11(4), 537–553. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275733
39.
NortonG.ThompsonA. (2014). Ethics and sustainable development: The virtues of an adaptive approach to environmental choice. In AtkinsonG.DietzS.NeumayerE.AgarwalaM. (Eds.), Handbook of sustainable development (2nd ed., pp. 105–124). Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc.
40.
PaulJ.JeffersonF. (2019). A comparative analysis of student performance in an online vs. Face-to-face environmental science course from 2009 to 2016. Frontiers of Computer Science, 1(7), 1–9.
41.
PaulsenJ.McCormickA. C. (2020). Reassessing disparities in online learner student engagement in higher education. Educational Researcher, 49(1), 20–29.
42.
PeiL.WuH. (2019). Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medical Education Online, 24(1), 1666538.
43.
PeoplesR. (2009). Preparing today for a sustainable future. Journal of Management Education, 33(3), 376–383.
44.
PesonenH. L. (2003). Challenges of integrating environmental sustainability issues into business school curriculum: A case study from the University Of Jyväskylä, Finland. Journal of Management Education, 27(2), 158–171.
45.
Petrun SayersE. L.CraigC. A.GilbertzS.FengS.KaramR. T.BohmanA. (2020). Advancing STEM-based business sustainability: Mending the curricular gap. Management Teaching Review, 5(1), 82–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/2379298119852313
RothwellW. J.KazanasH. C. (2008). Mastering the instructional design process (4th ed.). Pfeiffer.
48.
RusinkoC. A. (2010). Integrating sustainability into management and business education: A matrix approach. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 507–519.
49.
ShephardK. (2008). Higher education for sustainability: Seeking affective learning outcomes. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 9(1), 87–98.
50.
ShrivastavaP. (2010). Pedagogy of passion for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 443–455.
51.
SroufeR. (2020). Business schools as living labs: Advancing sustainability in management education. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 726–765.
52.
SteketeeD. (2009). A million decisions: Life on the (sustainable business) frontier. Journal of Management Education, 33(3), 391–401.
53.
StrackM.ShephardK.JowettT.MogfordS.SkeaffS.MirosaM. (2019). Monitoring surveying students’ environmental attitudes as they experience higher education in New Zealand. Survey Review, 51(366), 257–264.
ThomassenA. O.JørgensenK. M. (2020). John Dewey and continuing management education: Problem-based learning for organizational sustainability. Journal of Workplace Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/jwl-05-2020-0080
56.
UrdanM. S.LuomaP. (2020). Designing effective sustainability assignments: How and why definitions of sustainability impact assignments and learning outcomes. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 794–821.
57.
U.S. Department of Education. (2020). Science, technology, engineering, and math including computer science. Retrieved February 4, 2020, from https://www.ed.gov/stem.
58.
WadeB.PiccininiT. (2020). Teaching scenario planning in sustainability courses: The creative play method. Journal of Management Education, 44(6), 699–725.
59.
WheelenT. L.HungerJ. D.HoffmanA. N.BamfordC. E. (2018). Strategic management and business policy: Globalization, innovation and sustainability. Pearson.
60.
WhitleyC. T.TakahashiB.ZwickleA.BesleyJ. C.LertpratchyaA. P. (2018). Sustainability behaviors among college students: An application of the VBN theory. Environmental Education Research, 24(2), 245–262.
61.
WilsonD. (2019). Exploring the intersection between engineering and sustainability education. Sustainability, 11(11), 3134. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113134
62.
WuY. C. J.HuangS.KuoL.WuW. H. (2010). Management education for sustainability: A web-based content analysis. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 9(3), 520–531.
63.
ZwickleA.JonesK. (2018). Sustainability knowledge and attitudes – Assessing latent constructs. In Leal FilhoW.MaraR.CallewaertJ. (Eds.), Handbook of sustainability and social science research (pp. 435–451). Springer International Publishing.
64.
ZwickleA.KoontzT. M.SlagleK.BruskotterJ. T. (2014). Assessing sustainability knowledge of a student population. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 15(4), 375–389.
