Educators have been challenged to identify threshold concepts and develop transformed students. This stands in stark contrast to many curriculum design and delivery models that currently view students as repositories of knowledge. In this article, we argue that educators can reach both goals, identify stumbling blocks and transforming students, through purposeful and insightful blending of a curriculum design and delivery using a conception-focused curriculum (CFC) to design courses built on the integration of concepts and viewing them through the lens of the discipline. This process takes advantage of the student’s previous knowledge and their natural learning tendencies. Educators that use the CFC model will identify threshold concepts, design learning activities that support learning outcomes, access prior knowledge and understandings, and guide students to overcome learning barriers.
AndersonL. W.KrathwohlR. D. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.
BloomB. S. (1954). Taxonomy of educational objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longman.
4.
BuzanT.BuzanB. (1993). The mind map book: How to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped potential. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
5.
DaviesP.ManganJ. (2007). Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 711-726.
6.
EricksonH. L. (2002). Concept-based curriculum and instruction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
7.
EricksonH. L. (2007). Concept-based curriculum and instruction for the thinking classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
8.
GardnerH. W. (1993). Educating for understanding. American School Board Journal, 180, 20-24.
9.
GelbM. (1998). How to think like Leonardo Da Vinci. New York, NY: Bantam Dell.
10.
GiddensJ. F.WrightM.GrayI. (2012). Selecting concepts for a concept-based curriculum: Application of a benchmark approach. Journal of Nursing Education, 51, 511-515.
11.
HawkinsB.EdwardsG. (2013). Managing the monsters of doubt: Liminality, threshold concepts and leadership learning. Management Learning. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1350507613501736
12.
HibbertP.CunliffeA. (2013). Responsible management: Engaging moral reflexive practices through threshold concepts. Journal of Business Ethics. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1993-7
13.
JamesW. (1885). On the functions of cognition. Mind, 10, 27-44.
14.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
15.
KorostelevaE. (2010). Threshold concepts through enactive learning: How effective are they in the student of European politics?International Studies Perspectives, 11, 37-49.
16.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2003). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines (ETL Project: Occasional Report 4). Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh.
17.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 255-289.
18.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (2006). Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge. London, England: Routledge.
19.
MeyerJ. H. F.LandR.DaviesP. (2008). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (4): Issues of variation and variability. In LandR.MeyerJ. H. F.SmithJ. (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 59-74). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
20.
MezirowJ. (1990). How critical reflection triggers transformative learning. In MezirowJ. & Associates (Eds.), Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning (pp. 1-20). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
21.
MezirowJ. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformation theory. In MezirowJ. & Associates (Eds.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress (pp. 3-34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
22.
PerkinsD. (1992). Smart schools: From training memories to educating minds. New York, NY: Free Press.
23.
PerkinsD. (1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57, 6-11.
24.
PerkinsD. (2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. In MeyerJ. H. F.LandR. (Eds.), Overcoming barriers to student understanding: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33-47). London, England: Routledge.
25.
RamsdenP. (2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London, England: Routledge Falmer.
26.
RenzulliJ. S. (1988). The multiple menu model for developing differentiated curriculum for the gifted and talented. Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 298-309.
27.
RenzulliJ. S.LeppienJ. H.HayesT. S. (2000). The multiple menu model: A practical guide for developing differentiated curriculum. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
28.
RousseauD. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations, Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 2, 121-139.
29.
TomlinsonC. A.KaplanS. N.RenzulliJ. S.PurcellJ. H.LeppienJ. H.BurnsD. E.. . . ImbeauM. B. (2009). The parallel curriculum. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
30.
TraffordV. (2008). Conceptual frameworks as a threshold concept in doctorateness. In LandR.MeyerJ. H. F.SmithJ. (Eds.), Threshold concepts within the disciplines (pp. 273-288). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense.
31.
TurnerP. M.CarriveauR. S. (2010). Next generation course redesign. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
32.
Van Tassel-BaskaJ.BrownE. (2007). Toward best practice: An analysis of efficacy of curriculum models in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 342-357.
33.
YipJ.RaelinJ. A. (2011). Threshold concepts and modalities for teaching leadership practice. Management Learning, 43, 333-354.
34.
WigginsG.McTigheJ. (1998). Understanding by design. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
35.
WrightA. L.GilmoreA. (2012). Threshold concepts and conceptions: Student learning in introductory management courses. Journal of Management Education, 36, 614-635.
