Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This article explores how insights from the broader education literature on threshold concepts and conceptions can be applied to improve the teaching of undergraduate introductory management courses. The authors propose that these courses are underpinned by the threshold conception, or “underlying game,” that management is a practice informed by theory. This threshold conception is both troublesome and transformative for novice management students. Using the redesign of the undergraduate introductory management course the authors teach as an exemplar, they demonstrate how student learning can be improved by designing learning activities and assessment that help students “see” the threshold conception that connects management theory and practice.

Keywords

threshold concepts threshold conceptions introductory management first-year students deep learning management as practice course design

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Charan

(1976). Classroom techniques in teaching by the case method. Academy of Management Review, 1, 116-123.

Davies

Mangan

(2006, August). Embedding threshold concepts: From theory to pedagogical principles to learning activities. Paper presented at the Threshold Concepts Within the Disciplines Symposium, Glasgow, Scotland.

Davies

Mangan

(2007). Threshold concepts and the integration of understanding in economics. Studies in Higher Education, 32, 711-726.

Dooley

A. R.

Skinner

(1977). Casing case-method methods. Academy of Management Review, 2, 277-289.

Entwhistle

(2005). Learning outcomes and ways of thinking across contrasting disciplines and settings in higher education. Curriculum Journal, 16(1), 67-82.

Irvine

Carmichael

(2009). Threshold concepts: A point of focus for practitioner research. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 103-119.

Kiley

Wisker

(2009). Threshold concepts in research education and evidence of threshold crossing. Higher Education Research & Development, 28, 431-441.

Land

Cousin

Meyer

J. H. F.

Davies

(2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (3): Implications for course design and evaluation. In Rust

(Ed.), Improving student learning diversity and inclusivity (pp. 53-63). Oxford, England: Oxford Centre for Staff Learning and Development.

Lucas

(2000). Worlds apart: Students’ experiences of learning introductory accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 11, 479-504.

10.

Lucas

Mladenovic

(2007). The potential of threshold concepts: An emerging framework for educational research and practice. London Review of Education, 5, 237-248.

11.

Lundberg

C. C.

Rainsford

Shay

J. P.

Young

C. A.

(2001). Case writing reconsidered. Journal of Management Education, 25, 450-463.

12.

Lundberg

C. C.

Winn

(2005). The great case-teaching-notes debate. Journal of Management Education, 29, 268-283.

13.

Meyer

J. H. F.

Land

(2003, May). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: Linkages to ways of thinking and practising within the disciplines (ETL Project: Occasional Report No. 4). Edinburgh, Scotland: University of Edinburgh.

14.

Meyer

J. H. F.

Land

(2005). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning. Higher Education, 49, 255-289.

15.

Meyer

J. H. F.

Land

(2008, June). Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (5): Dynamics of assessment. Paper presented at the Second International Conference on Threshold Concepts, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

16.

Norton

(2009). Assessing student learning. In Fry

Ketteridge

H. S.

Marshall

(Eds.), Teaching and learning in higher education: Enhancing academic practice (pp. 132-149). New York, NY: Routledge.

17.

O’Donovan

Price

Rust

(2000). The student experience of criterion-referenced assessment (through the introduction of a common criteria assessment grid). Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 38(1), 74-85.

18.

Perkins

(1999). The many faces of constructivism. Educational Leadership, 57(3), 6-11.

19.

Perkins

(2006). Constructivism and troublesome knowledge. Overcoming barriers to student understanding. In Meyer

J. H. F.

Land

(Eds.), Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (pp. 33-47). London, England: Routledge.

20.

Ramsden

(2003). Learning to teach in higher education. London, England: Routledge Falmer.

21.

Sadler

D. R.

(2005). Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 30, 175-194.

22.

Scheja

Pettersson

(2010). Transformation and contextualization: Conceptualizing students’ conceptual understandings of threshold concepts in calculus. Higher Education, 59, 221-241.

23.

Schön

D. A.

(1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, England: Basic Books.

24.

Thompson

T. A.

Purdy

J. M.

Fandt

P. M.

(1997). Building a strong foundation: Using a computer simulation in an Introductory Management Course. Journal of Management Education, 21, 418-434.

25.

Whetten

D. A.

(2007). Principles of effective course design: What I wish I had known about learning-centred teaching 30 years ago. Journal of Management Education, 31, 339-357.

26.

Whetten

D. A.

Clark

S. C.

(1996). An integrated model for teaching management skills. Journal of Management Education, 20, 152-181.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB