The Under Construction Exercise was developed by the authors to highlight key factors of work design that when implemented among the work group or entire organization can lead to an environment conducive to fostering satisfaction and motivation. In the exercise, groups are assigned to one of four different conditions that are designed to emulate elements of the Job Characteristics Model: the core job dimensions, critical psychological states, and personal and work outcomes. Students work in groups to complete a LEGO building project in a short amount of time and are then asked to reflect on the activity. Instructions for conducting and debriefing the 45-minute exercise are followed by students’ reactions to the activity.
ClarkM. A.BlanceroD.LuceC.MarronG. (2001). Teaching work group-task performance: The fit for performance exercise. Journal of Management Education, 25, 531-552.
2.
ElsbachK. D.HargadonA. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17, 470-483.
3.
EskildsenJ. K.DahlgaardJ. J. (2000). A casual model for employee satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 11, 1081-1094.
4.
FornaciariC. J.Lund DeanK. (2005). Experiencing organizational work design: Beyond Hackman and Oldham. Journal of Management Education, 29, 631-653.
5.
FriedY.FerrisG. R. (1987). The validity of the job characteristics model: A review and meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 40, 287-322.
6.
GagnéM.SénécalC. B.KoestnerR. (1997). Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: A multidimensional model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 27, 1222-1240.
7.
GreenbergC. I.WangY. D.DossettD. L. (1982). Effects of work group size and task size on observers’ job characteristics ratings. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13(1), 53-66.
8.
HackmanJ. R.LawlerE.III. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph, 55, 259-285.
9.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, 250-279.
10.
HackmanJ. R.OldhamG. R. (1980). Work redesign. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
11.
HageJ. (1965). An axiomatic theory of organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 10, 289-320.
12.
JudgeT. A.BonoJ. E.LockeE. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237-249.
13.
JudgeT. A.ThoresenC. J.BonoJ. E.PattonG. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 376-407.
14.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NG: Prentice-Hall.
15.
LewisA. C.GrosserM. (2012). The change game: An experiential exercise demonstrating barriers to change. Journal of Management Education, 36, 669-697.
16.
LoherB. T.NoeR. A.MoellerN. L.FitzgeraldM. P. (1985). A meta-analysis of the relation of job characteristics to job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 280-289.
17.
LunenburgF. D. (2012). Organizational structure: Mintzberg’s framework. International Journal of Scholarly, Academic, Intellectual Diversity, 14, 1-8.
18.
LyonsP. R.NicolD. M. (2001). Structuring-by-the-numbers: A process for discovering and understanding organizational structure. Journal of Management Education, 25, 726-736.
19.
MilletteV.GagnéM. (2008). Designing volunteers’ tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction, and performance: The impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motivation & Emotion, 32, 11-22.
20.
MintzbergH. (1992). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
21.
PaxtonJ. (2003). A short, simple learning curve classroom exercise. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 1, 303-307.
22.
PendleyB. D. (1997). Keeping a scientific notebook: The Lego exercise. Journal of Chemical Education, 74, 1065.
23.
ReddyW. B.ByrnesA. (1972). Effects of interpersonal group composition on the problem-solving behavior of middle managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56, 516-517.
24.
ShalleyC. E.GilsonL. L.BlumT. C. (2009). Interactive effects of growth need strength, work context, and job complexity on self-reported creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 489-505.
25.
SmrtD. L.NelsonR. E. (2013). Playing with a concept: Teaching Job Characteristics Model with a Tinkertoy builder set. Journal of Management Education, 37, 539-561.
26.
TorracoR. J. (2005). Work design theory: A review and critique with implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16, 85-109.
27.
WallT. D.CleggC. W.JacksonP. R. (1978). An evaluation of the Job Characteristics Model. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 51, 183-196.
28.
WeberM. (1947). The theory of social and economic organization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
