The conventional definitions of power and masculinity are tightly conflated. The same words that are often used to describe power, such as authority, control, and decisiveness, are also often used to define masculinity. Where does that leave women in building and using power? Even as feminist scholars attempt to decouple the definition of power from masculinity by expanding power paradigms, cultural norms in the Unites States are still such that there is an expectation of women to be collaborative and self-sacrificing. As a result, many women are reluctant to use “masculine” power, or when they do, they are faced with the double bind: Be powerful but unfeminine. This exercise allows both female and male students to explore their personal relationship with power and how they build and use power to influence outcomes. The exercise fosters a rich discussion about cultural definitions and expectations on power and the double binds they create for both men and women.
BellE. L. J. E.NkomoS. M. (2001). Our separate ways: Black and White women and the struggle for professional identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
3.
Blake-BeardS. D.RobertsL. M. (2004). Releasing the double bind of visibility for minorities in the workplace (CGO Commentary No. 4). Boston, MA: Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Management.
4.
BolmanL.DealT. (1991). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
BolmanL.DealT. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6.
BolmanL.DealT. (2003). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (3rd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
7.
BreyP. (2008). The technological construction of social power. Social Epistemology, 22, 71-95.
8.
BrockC. L. (2000). Female executives, self-identity, and the double bind (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Fielding Institute, Santa Barbara, CA.
9.
BuchananD. A. (2008). You stab my back, I’ll stab yours: Management experience and perceptions of organization political behavior. British Journal of Management, 19, 49-64.
10.
CarliL. L. (1999). Gender, interpersonal power, and social influence. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 81-99.
11.
CohenA. R.BradfordD. L. (1989). Influence without authority: The use of alliances, reciprocity, and exchange to accomplish work. Organizational Dynamics, 17(3), 5-17.
12.
DaveyK. M. (2008). Women’s accounts of organizational politics as a gendering process. Gender, Work, & Organization, 15, 650-671.
13.
DenissenA. M. (2010). The right tools for the job: Constructing gender meanings and identities in the male-dominated building trades. Human Relations, 63, 1051-1069.
14.
DuffyA. (1986). Reformulating power for women. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 23, 22-46.
15.
EaglyA. H.JohnsonB.T. (1990). Gender and leadership styles: A meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
16.
EislerR. (2005). The economics of the enlightened use of power. In CoughlinL.WindgardE.HollihanK. (Eds.), Enlightened power: How women are transforming the practice of leadership (pp. 21-38). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
17.
ElyR. J.MeyersonD. E. (2007). Unmasking manly men: The organizational reconstruction of men’s identity. Retrieved from http://sloan.mit.edu/osg/pdf/Ely.pdf
18.
FletcherJ. (2004). The paradox of post heroic leadership: An essay on gender, power and transformational change. Leadership Quarterly, 15, 647-662.
19.
FletcherJ.BailynL.Blake-BeardS. (2009). Practical pushing: Creating discursive space in organizational narratives. In CoxJ. W.LeTrent-JonesT.WeirD.VoronovM. (Eds.), Critical management studies at work: Multidisciplinary approaches to negotiating tensions between theory and practice (pp. 82-93). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier.
20.
FrenchJ. R.RavenB. (1959). The bases of social power. In CartwrightD. (Ed.), Studies of social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor, MI: Research Center for Group Dynamics, University of Michigan.
21.
GamsonW. A. (1968). Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: Dorsey Press.
22.
GandzJ.MurrayV. (1980). The experience of workplace politics. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 237-251.
23.
GarfinkleS. H. (1975). Occupations of women and Black workers, 1962-74. Monthly Labor Review, 98(11), 25-35.
24.
GriscomJ. L. (1992). Women and power: Definition, dualism, and difference. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 389-414.
25.
GroshevI. V. (2002). Gender perceptions of power. Sociological Research, 41, 5-20.
26.
GuinierL. (1998). Lessons and challenges of becoming gentlemen. New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 24, 1-16.
27.
HannaganR. J. (2008). Genes, brains and gendered behavior: Rethinking power and politics in response to Condit, Liesen, and Vandermassen. Sex Roles, 59, 504-511.
28.
HanscomeM. L. (2000). Influence of gender and power relationships among human resource development managers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Georgia, Athens.
29.
HeimP. (1992). Hardball for women: Winning at the game of business. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
30.
HillL. A. (1994, January20). Power dynamics in organizations (Harvard Business School Note 494-083). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
31.
HillL. A. (2000). What it really means to manage: Exercising power and influence (Harvard Business School Note 9-400-041). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
32.
HofstedeG. H. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work related values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
JohnsonP. (1976). Women and power: Toward a theory of effectiveness. Journal of Social Issues, 32(3), 99-110.
34.
KanterR. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
35.
KnudsonH. R.WoodworthR. T.BellC. (1979). Management: An experiential approach (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
36.
KotterJ. P.Power and influence: Beyond formal authority. New York: Free Press, 1985.
37.
KouzesJ. M.PosnerB. Z. (2007). The leadership challenge (4th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
38.
MaxfieldS.ShapiroM.HassS.GuptaV. (2010). Gender and risk: Women, risk taking and risk aversion. Gender in Management, 25, 585-604.
39.
McClellandD. C.BurnhamD. H. (2003, January). Power is the great motivator. Harvard Business Review, pp. 117-126. (Original work published March-April, 1976).
40.
MeyerJ.MaesP. L. (1983). The reproduction of occupational segregation among young women. Industrial Relations, 22, 115-124.
41.
MillerC. L.CumminsA. G. (1992). An examination of women’s perspectives on power. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 415-428.
42.
MumbyD. (2001). Power and politics. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 585-623). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
43.
PfefferJ. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
44.
RavenB. H. (1992). A power/interaction model of interpersonal influence: French and Raven thirty years later. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 7, 217-244.
45.
RavenB. H. (2008). The bases of power and the power/interaction model of interpersonal influence. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 8(1), 1-22.
46.
SapienzaP.ZingalesL.MaestripieriD. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 15268-15273. Retrieved from www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0907352106.
47.
SellersP.MeroJ. (2003, October13). Power: Do women really want it?Fortune, 148(8), 80-100.
48.
SmithH. L.GrenierM. (1982). Sources of organizational power for women: Overcoming structural obstacles. Sex Roles, 8, 733-746.
49.
TannenD. (2000). The power of talk: who gets heard and why (Harvard Business School Note 95510). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
50.
TischerL. (2004, February). Where are the women? Not in the corner office, even after all these years. Not now. Maybe not ever. So what happened?Fast Company, pp. 32-60.
51.
TorelliC. J.ShavittS. (2010). Culture and concepts of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 703-723. doi:10.1037/a0019973
52.
ValleyK. L.Long-LingoE. (2001, March21). Power and influence: Achieving your objectives in organizations (Harvard Business School Note 801-425). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
53.
WalkerM. (2002). Power and effectiveness: Envisioning an alternate paradigm—Work in progress (Paper No. 94). Wellesley, MA: Jean Baker Miller Training Institute, Wellesley Centers for Women.
54.
WallisC. (2004, March22). The case for staying home: Caught between the pressures of the workplace and the demands of being a mom, more women are sticking with the kids. Time Magazine, pp. 51-59.
55.
ZanziA.O’NeillR. M. (2001). Sanctioned versus non-sanctioned political tactics. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 245-262.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
