Problem-based learning (PBL) shifts the traditional teaching paradigm. Rather than being teacher centered, PBL is student centered. Rather than presenting content first, PBL presents the problem first. Rather than presenting the students with a well-structured problem with a clear answer, PBL presents the students with an ill-structured problem with no clear solution. The research evidence, although still limited, indicates that PBL is more effective than the traditional teaching paradigm. However, to implement PBL successfully requires significant rethinking. The article examines three critical success factors essential for making PBL successful in management education. Those critical success factors are orienting students to this new instructional strategy, picking the problem, and forming the teams. The author shares his experiences using PBL and an instrument he has found useful in forming the teams.
Barker, J. A. (1992). Future edge: Discovering the new paradigms of success. New York: Marrow.
2.
Barrows, H. S. (1985). How to design a problem-based curriculum for pre-clinical years. New York: Springer.
3.
Barrows, H. S., & Tamblyn, R. H. (1980). PBL: An approach to medical education. New York: Springer.
4.
Basadur, M., Graen, G., & Wakabayashi, M. (1990). Identifying individual differences in creative problem solving style. Journal of Creative Behavior, 24, 111-131.
5.
Basadur, M., & Head, M. (2001). Team performance and satisfaction: A link to cognitive style within a process framework. Journal of Creative Behavior, 35, 227-248.
6.
Bennis, W. G., & Thomas, R. J. (2002). Crucibles of leadership. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 39-45.
7.
Bransford, J. D., & Vye, N. J. (1989). A perspective on cognitive research and its implications for instruction. In L. B. Resnick & L. E. Klopfer (Eds.), Towards the thinking curriculum (pp. 173-205). Reston, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
8.
de Bono, E. (1985). Six thinking hats. Boston: Little, Brown.
9.
Delisle, R. (1997). How to use PBL in the classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
10.
Dench, S. (1997). Changing skills needs: What makes people employable?Industrial & Commercial Training, 29, 190-193.
11.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Free Press.
12.
Divita, S. (1996). Being a team player is essential to your career. Marketing News, 30(19), 8-8.
13.
Duch, B. (1996). Problems: A key factor in PBL. Retrieved December 23, 2002, from www.udel.edu/pbl/cte/spr96-phys.html
14.
Edens, K. M. (2000). Preparing problem solvers for the 21st century through PBL. College Teaching, 48(2), 55-60.
15.
Farnham-Diggory, S. (1972). Cognitive processes in education. New York: Harper & Row.
16.
Focus Groups for the Business Fellows Program. (1999). College Station, TX: Mays Business School.
17.
Gallagher, S. A. (1997). PBL: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going?Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 332-362.
18.
Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J. W. J., & Woodman, R. W. (1998). Organizational behavior (8th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
19.
Holt, D. G., & Willard-Holt, C. (2000). Let’s get real: Students solving authentic corporate problems. Phi Delta Kappan, 82, 243-246.
20.
Katzenbach, J. R., & Smith, D. K. (1993). The wisdom of teams. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
21.
Knowles, M. S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education: From pedagogy to androgogy (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge Books.
22.
Kolb, D. A. (1976). Management and the learning process. California Management Review, 18, 21-31.
23.
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24.
LaFasto, F., & Larson, C. (2001). When teams work best. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
McGill, M. E., & Slocum, J. W. J. (1998). A little leadership, please?Organizational Dynamics, 26(3), 39-49.
26.
Merriam, S. B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. In S. B. Merriam (Ed.), The new update on adult learning theory (Vol. 89, pp. 3-13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Michaelson, L. K., & Razook, N. (2000). Making learning groups effective. Selections, 26(1), 28-35.
28.
Mill, S. (2002). Become an indispensable asset. Computing Canada, 28(2), 25-25.
29.
Palmer, P. J. (1998). The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30.
Peterson, T. O., & Van Fleet, D. D. (2003, November). Critical managerial leadership behaviors: An empirical study of crisis and stable environments. Paper presented at the Southern Management Association, Clearwater, Florida.
31.
Rana, E. (2001). Cyber-guru calls for leadership. People Management, 7(22), 11-11.
32.
Starbuck, W. H., & Milliken, F. J. (1988). Executive perceptual filters: What they notice and how they make sense. In D. C. Hambrick (Ed.), The executive effect: Concepts and methods for studying top managers (pp. 35-65). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
33.
Stepien, W., & Pyke, S. L. (1997). Designing PBL units. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 20, 380-400.
34.
Stinson, J. E., & Milter, R. G. (1996). PBL in business education: Curriculum design and implementation issues. In L. Wilkerson & W. H. Gijselaers (Eds.), Bringing PBL to higher education: Theory and practice (Vol. 68, pp. 33-42). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
35.
Xie, J. L., & Johns, G. (1995). Job scope and stress: Can job scope be too high?Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1288-1309.
36.
Yukl, G. A., & Van Fleet, D. D. (1982). Cross-situational, multimethod research on military leader effectiveness. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 87-108.
