This article aims to uncover hidden dimensions of the metaphor of consumerism in management education. By exploring the metaphor, the authors elucidate the implicit claims in the assertion that teachers produce business education and students consume that product. The image of commodification structures a discourse that involves conceptions of power, knowledge, and socially useful activity. The discourse emanates from social and educational institutions that shape relations between students and teachers. To understand how the metaphor creates subjective perceptions, the authors propose a linguistic-based framework as an analytical device. They conclude with specific reference to teaching activities and ways in which the so-called shadow of consumerism can be empirically examined.
Barnes, B. (1986). On authority and its relationship to power. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 180-195). Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
2.
Bayer, A. A. (1996). What is wrong with customer?College Teaching, 44(3), 82-82.
3.
Bevir, M. (1999). Foucault, power, and institutions. Political Studies, 47, 345-359.
4.
Boje, D. M. (1995). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land”. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 997-1035.
5.
Burrell, G. (1997). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Michel Foucault. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organization theory: From Pantopticon to technologies of the self (pp. 14-28). London: Sage.
6.
Chung, E., & McLarney, C. (2000). The classroom as a service encounter: Suggestions for value creation. Journal of Management Education, 24, 484-500.
7.
Clarke, R. E. (1982). Antagonism between achievement and enjoyment in ATI studies. Educational Psychologist, 17, 92-101.
8.
Cross, G. (2000). An all-consuming century: Why commercialism won in modern America. New York: Columbia University Press.
9.
Deetz, S. A. (1998). Discursive formations, strategized subordination and self-surveillance. In A. McKinlay & K. Starkey (Eds.), Foucault, management and organization theory: From Pantopticon to technologies of the self (pp. 151-172). London: Sage.
10.
Deetz, S. A., & Mumby, D. K. (1985). Metaphors, information, and power. Information and Behavior, 1, 369-386.
11.
Ford, W. S. Z. (1999). Communication and customer service. In M. E. Roloff (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 22 (pp. 341-375). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
Ford, W. S. Z., & Etienne, C. N. (1994). Can I help you?: A framework for the interdisciplinary literature on customer service encounters. Management Communication Quarterly, 7, 413-441.
13.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon.
14.
Frank, T. (2001). One market under God: Extreme capitalism, market populism, and the end of economic democracy. New York: Anchor.
15.
Franz, R. S. (1998). Whatever you do, don’t treat your students like customers!Journal of Management Education, 22, 63-69.
16.
Gemmill, G. (1986). The dynamics of the group shadow in intergroup relations. Small Group Behavior, 17(2), 229-240.
17.
Gemmill, G., & Costello, M. (1990). Group mirroring as a means for exploring the group shadow: A perspective for organizational consultation. Consultation, 9(4), 277-291.
18.
Gemmill, G., & Wilemon, D. (1994). The hidden side of leadership in technical team management. In R. Katz (Ed.), The human side of managing technological innovation: A collection of readings (pp. 237-245). New York: Oxford University Press.
19.
Hester, L., Koger, P., & McCauley, C. (1985). Individual differences in customer sociability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 15, 453-456.
20.
Hillman, J. (1962). Friends and enemies … the dark side of relationship. Harvest, 8, 1-22.
21.
Holt, D. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 1-16.
22.
Hunt, H. G., III, & Hogler, R. (1990). Agency theory as ideology: A comparative analysis based on critical legal theory and radical accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15, 437-454.
23.
Jensen, M. C. (1983).Organization theory and methodology. The Accounting Review, 58 (April), 319-339.
24.
Jung, C. G. (1970). After the catastrophe. In H. Read & M. Fordham(Eds.), Civilizationin transition: The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 10, p. 30). New York: Ballinger.
25.
Ketrow, S. M. (1991). Nonverbal communication and client satisfaction in computer-assisted transactions. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 192-219.
26.
Koch, S., & Deetz, S. L. (1981). Metaphor analysis of social reality in organizations. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 9, 1-15.
27.
Krehbiel, T. C., McClure, R. H., & Pratsini, E. (1997). Using student disconfirmation as a measure of classroom effectiveness. Journal of Education for Business, 72, 224-230.
28.
Lakoff, G.,& Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29.
McCormack, A. E., & Kinloch, G. C. (1986). Interracial contact in the customer-clerk situation. Journal of Social Psychology, 126, 551-553.
30.
Ortony, A. (1979). Metaphor and thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Pfeffer, J. & Fong, C. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1, 78-95.
32.
Pondy, L., & Mitroff, I. I. (1979). Beyond open system models of organization. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 1, pp. 3-29). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
33.
Putnam, L. L. (1999). Shifting metaphors of organizational communication: The rise of discourse perspectives. In P. Salem (Ed.), Organizational communication and change (pp. 45-65). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
34.
Putnam, L. L., Phillips, N., & Chapman, P. (1996). Metaphors of communication and organization. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organizational studies (pp. 375-408). London: Sage.
35.
Rafeali, A., & Sutton, R. I. (1990). Busy stores and demanding customers: How do they affect the display of positive emotion?Academy of Management Journal, 33, 623-627.
36.
Rovenpor, J. (1995). Repeat-purchase behavior as a criterion of teaching. Journal of Education for Business, 70, 321-327.
37.
Tomkovick, C., Al-Khatib, J.Baradwaj, B. G., & Jones, S. I. (1996). An assessment of the service quality provided to foreign students at U.S. business schools. Journal of Education for Business, 71, 130-135.
38.
Townley, B. (1994). Reframing human resource management: Power, ethics and the subject at work. London: Sage.
39.
Treacy, M., & Wiersema, F. (1993). Customer intimacy and other value disciplines. Harvard Business Review, 71, 84-93.
40.
Van Fleet, D. D. (1995). Designing MBA programs with students in mind. Journal of Management Education, 19, 373-379.
41.
Whitmont, E. C. (1991). The evolution of the shadow. In H. Abrams & C. Zweig (Eds.), Meeting the shadow: The hidden power of the dark side of human nature. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher.
42.
Zell, D. (2001). The market-driven business school: Has the pendulum swung too far?Journal of Management Inquiry, 10, 324-338.
43.
Zweig, C., & Abrams, J. (1991). Meeting the shadow: The hidden power of the dark side of human nature. Los Angeles: Jeremy P. Tarcher.
44.
Zweig, C., & Wolf, S. (1997). Romancing the shadow: Illuminating the dark side of the soul. New York: Ballantine.
