Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

The Vocational Rehabilitation Technical Assistance Center for Quality Employment (VRTAC-QE) uses a data-driven approach to analyze the efficacy of its website (https://tacqe.com). The center also employs a management information system (MIS) with RSA-911 data to enable interagency data sharing through the Salesforce platform.

Objective

VRTAC-QE uses quantitative methods to identify the usage and efficacy of its website, and the MIS provides access to large data sets that can measure impact in vocational rehabilitation (VR). These quantitative measures are in line with the Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA).

Methods

Quantify website usage by tabulating user statistics, state rehabilitation service agencies (SVRA) participation, and employing longitudinal analysis to determine the efficacy of technical assistance (TA) among participating parties.

Results

Quantitative results show that the VRTAC-QE digital resources are utilized above target goals, and that participating SVRAs benefit from TA, as longitudinal data shows an increase in positive employment status at VR exit during the project period.

Conclusions

Data-driven approaches identify where VR efforts are successful, and the adoption of MIS architecture promotes wider access to large data sets among professionals, enhancing and standardizing data.

Keywords

vocational rehabilitation management information system technical assistance collaboration computer/internet applications evidence-based practice

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allard

S. W.

Wiegand

E. R.

Schlecht

Datta

A. R.

Goerge

R. M.

Weigensberg

(2018). State agencies’ use of administrative data for improved practice: Needs, challenges, and opportunities. Public Administration Review, 78(2), 240–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12883

Bishop

Brinck

E. A.

Tansey

T. N.

Anderson

C. A.

Brehmer

Castillo

S. L.

(2025). The vocational rehabilitation technical assistance center for quality employment: Where are we now? A project review and progress summary. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 62(1), 5–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/10522263241300831

Burfein

Roxbury

Doig

E. J.

McSween

M.-P.

de Silva

Copland

D. A.

(2025). Return to work for stroke survivors with aphasia: A quantitative scoping review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 35(5), 1081–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2024.2381874

Collins

M. E.

(2001). Transition to adulthood for vulnerable youths: A review of research and implications for policy. Social Service Review, 75(2), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1086/322209

Darby

Kinnevy

S. C.

(2010). GPRA and the development of performance measures. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 7(1-2), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433710903175833

Defur

S. H.

Todd-Allen

Getzel

E. E.

(2001). Parent participation in the transition planning process. Career Development for Exceptional Individuals, 24(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/088572880102400103

Government Performance and Results Act, Pub. L. No. 103-62, 107 Stat. 285. (1993).

Guentherman

Hartman

Schlegelmilch

Brinck

E. A.

Anderson

C. A.

(2021). Building a management information system with inter-agency data sharing to improve data-based decision making across systems: Experiences from Wisconsin PROMISE. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 65(1), 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355220962182

Hansen

Keeton

Jones

(2023). Understanding the provision of self-employment for people with disabilities in the State Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program: A policy review. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 59(1), 25–40. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-230025

10.

Hartman

Schlegelmilch

Roskowski

Anderson

C. A.

Tansey

T. N.

(2019). Early findings from the Wisconsin PROMISE project: Implications for policy and practice. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 51(2), 167–181. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-191036

11.

Heinrich

C. J.

(2002). Outcomes–based performance management in the public sector: Implications for government accountability and effectiveness. Public Administration Review, 62(6), 712–725. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00253

12.

Hermansen

Regier

D. A.

Pollard

(2022). Developing data sharing models for health research with real-world data: A scoping review of patient and public preferences. Journal of Medical Systems, 46(12), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-022-01875-3

13.

Huang

I.-C.

Cheing

Rumrill

Bengtson

Chan

Telzlaff

Snitker

(2016). Characteristics of people with disabilities receiving assistive technology services in vocational rehabilitation: A logistic regression analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 45(1), 63–72. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-160811

14.

Kaya

Chan

(2017). Vocational rehabilitation services and outcomes for working age people with depression and other mood disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation, 83(3), 44–52.

15.

Lamont

(2024). Overcoming data silos: A range of options. Knowledge Management World, 33(1), 6–8.

16.

McKelvey

S. P.

Lambert

Camden

Getzel

E. E.

Norris

(2023). Providing technical assistance to inclusive postsecondary education programs on paid employment experiences of college students with intellectual and developmental disabilities: A case study. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 60(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-230056

17.

Umucu

Granger

T. A.

Zencir

A. C.

Beaven

Wagler

Trieber

M. A.

Lee

(2025). Predictors of competitive integrated employment among veterans across state-federal vocational rehabilitation programs: A national analysis. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 63(3), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/10522263251376617

18.

U.S. Department of Education. (2024). Rehabilitation Services Administration Report for Fiscal Years 2021-2022. https://rsa.ed.gov/

19.

VRTAC-QE. (2022). Vocational Rehabilitation Technical Assistance Center for Quality Employment: Comprehensive Review. https://tacqe.com

20.

VRTAC-QE. (2025). Vocational Rehabilitation Technical Assistance Center for Quality Employment (VRTAC-QE). https://tacqe.com/

21.

Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act, 29 U.S.C. § 3101. (2014).

Data-driven Approaches to Evaluate the Impact of Technical Assistance

Abstract

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References