Supported Employment (SE) and Customized Employment (CE) are vocational rehabilitation services designed to support individuals with significant disabilities to achieve competitive integrated employment. Both services target individuals for whom employment has historically been difficult to obtain. but they differ in implementation. These differences may lead to varying employment outcomes, such as occupation types, wages, and hours worked.
Objective
This study analyzes FY17-FY21 RSA-911 data to compare the outcomes at exit for individuals receiving SE and CE vocational rehabilitation services.
Methods
Propensity score matching was used to create comparable SE and CE samples to (a) examine the prevalence of CE and SE services within vocational rehabilitation programs, (b) describe exit patterns among individuals receiving these services, and (c) identify differences in employment outcomes.
Results
A smaller proportion of individuals receiving CE exited into competitive integrated employment compared to those receiving SE. However, CE participants were more likely to enter self-employment and a broader range of occupations, indicating that CE may provide more personalized and flexible employment options.
Conclusion
This analysis highlights disparities in the use and outcomes of CE and SE services within state vocational rehabilitation programs.
AlsamanM. A.LeeC. L. (2017). Employment outcomes of youth with disabilities in vocational rehabilitation: A multilevel analysis of RSA-911 data. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 60(2), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0034355216632363
2.
AustinB. S.LeeC.-L.FlemingA.PiS. (2019). Vocational rehabilitation outcomes for individuals with intellectual disabilities and co-occurring psychiatric disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation, 85(4), 14–23.
3.
BewickV.CheekL.BallJ. (2004). Statistics review 8: Qualitative data - tests of association. Critical Care, 8(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc2428
4.
BlandM. (2015). An introduction to medical statistics. Oxford university press.
5.
BoeltzigH.TimmonsJ. C.ButterworthJ. (2009). Gender differences in employment outcomes of individuals with developmental disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 31(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2009-0469
6.
CitronT.Brooks-LaneN.CrandellD.BradyK.CooperM.RevellG. (2008). A revolution in the employment process of individuals with disabilities: Customized employment as the catalyst for system change. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 28(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2008-00417
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
ElinsonL.FreyW.LiD.PalanT.HorneM. A.LR. (2008). Evaluation of customized employment in building the capacity of the workforce development system. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 28(3), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2008-00415
9.
EthridgeG.DowdenA. R.BrooksM.KwanN.HarleyD. (2020). Employment and earnings among ex-offenders with disabilities: A multivariate analysis of RSA-911 data. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 52(3), 279–289. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-201077
10.
FaulF.ErdfelderE.BuchnerA.LangA.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149
FeskoS.VarneyE.DiBiaseC.HippenstielM. (2008). Effective partnerships: Collaborative efforts that support customized employment. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 28(3), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-2008-00416
13.
HoD.ImaiK.KingG.StuartE. (2011). Matchit: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v042.i08
14.
HughesC.CarterE. (2001). Supporting transition from school to work. In WehmanP. (Ed.), Supported employment in business: Expanding the capacity of workers with disabilities (pp. 239–250). TRN.
15.
KangY.NordD. K.Nye-LengermanK. M. (2019). Weekly wage exploration of vocational rehabilitation service recipients: A quantile regression approach. Journal of Rehabilitation, 85(1), 4–14.
16.
KimJ.RiesenT.IngeK.KeetonB.WeathersM.TanseyT. (2023). Customized employment as a pathway to competitive integrated employment: An analysis of RSA 911 data of state vocational rehabilitation agencies with the highest use of this intervention. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 58(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-221227
RajeevH. D.SadekW. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982
20.
RiesenT.HallS.KeetonB.SnyderA. (2023). Internal consistency of the customized employment discovery fidelity scale: A preliminary study. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 66(3), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00343552211043259
21.
RiesenT.JuhaszA. C.RemundC. (2023). An analysis of the rehabilitation service administration 911 supported and customized employment outcome data for fiscal years 2017–2020. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 48(3), 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969231181901
22.
RiesenT.SnyderA.ByersR.KeetonB.IngeK. (2023). An updated review of the customized employment literature. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 58(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-221222
23.
RosenbaumP. R.RubinD. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
VRTAC-QE. (2022, November 15). Supported and customized employment side by side referral decision guide. Vocational Rehabilitation Technical Assistance Center for Quality Employment (VRTAC-QE). Retrieved November, 2024, from https://tacqe.com/supported-and-customized-employment-referral-decision-guide/
26.
WehmanP. (2023). Supported employment and customized employment: How effective are these interventions and what has been their impact on the field?Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 58(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-230022
27.
WehmanP.IngeK. J.RevellG. W. (2007). Supported employment and workplace supports: Overview and Background. In WehmanP.IngeK. J.RevellG. W.BrookV. A. (Eds.), Real work for real pay: Inclusive employment for people with disabilities (pp. 117–138). Brookes.
28.
WehmanP.TaylorJ.BrookeV.AvelloneL.WhittenburgH.HamW.BrookeA. M.CarrS. (2018). Toward competitive employment for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities: What progress have we made and where do we need to go. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 43(3), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918777730
29.
WinsorJ.ButterworthJ.MiglioreA.DominD.ZalewskaA.ShepardJ.KamauE.WedekingR.EdelsteinJ. (2023). StateData: The national report on employment services and outcomes through 2021. University of Massachusetts Boston, Institute for Community Inclusion.
