Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Despite labour market measures aimed at promoting work inclusion, the employment rate of people with disabilities in Norway remains lower in comparison to the general population. In addressing this discrepancy between policy and reality, our paper focuses on how disability is understood within the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV).

Objective

Our objective was to investigate frontline workers’ attitudes towards job-seeking graduates with disabilities and their suitability in different types of employment positions.

Method

We conducted a factorial survey experiment in which 1510 frontline workers evaluated 11701 vignettes describing graduate jobseekers with varying characteristics and types of disability. Multilevel linear regression analyses were performed to assess the effects of vignette variables and respondent characteristics on these evaluations.

Results

Results indicate that frontline workers within NAV are positive towards facilitating inclusive practices, but rate jobseekers with disabilities as significantly less likely to gain employment compared to those without. Personality traits and ethnicity also influence these ratings, indicating that perceptions of the successful jobseeker reflect ableist ideals that exist within the labour market.

Conclusion

We discuss our findings in light of street-level bureaucracy, arguing for increased attention towards the tension frontline workers face in promoting inclusion while simultaneously meeting employer expectations.

Keywords

ableism disability employment higher education survey

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

AKU (2018). Disabled people, labour force survey, 2nd quarter 2018. http://www.ssb.no/akutu/ .

Antonelli

Steverson

O’Mally

(2018). College graduates with visual impairments: A report on seeking and finding employment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 112(1), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1811200104

Ashcroft

T. J.

Lutfiyya

Z. M.

(2013). Nursing educators' perspectives of students with disabilities: A grounded theory study. Nurse Education Today, 33(11), 1316–1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.02.018

Auspurg

Hinz

(2015). Factorial Survey Experiments. Sage Publications.

Berre

(2024). Exploring disability disadvantage in hiring: A factorial survey among Norwegian employers. Work, Employment and Society, 38(4), 1087–1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170231175776

Bonfils

I. S.

Hansen

Dalum

H. S.

Eplov

L. F.

(2017). Implementation of the individual placement and support approachfacilitators and barriers. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(4), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2016.1222306

Breit

Andreassen

T. A.

Salomon

R. H.

(2016). Modification of public policies by street-level organisations: An institutional work perspective. Journal of Social Policy, 45(4), 709–728. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279416000246

Campbell

(2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness. Springer.

Carter

Whitworth

(2015). Creaming and parking in quasi-marketised welfare-to-work schemes: Designed out of or designed in to the UK work programme?. Journal of Social Policy, 44(2), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279414000841

10.

Christensen

Lægreid

(2010). Reforming Norway's Welfare Administration. Statskontoret.

11.

Cobigo

Ouellette-Kuntz

Lysaght

Martin

(2012). Shifting our conceptualization of social inclusion. Stigma Research and Action, 2(2), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.5463/sra.v1i3.45

12.

Cunnah

(2015). Disabled students: Identity, inclusion and work-based placements. Disability & Society, 30(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2014.996282

13.

Dybvik

J. B.

Schönfelder

(2021). Between health, morality and pragmatics: Common mental disorders and decision-making for disability benefits in the Norwegian welfare state. Disability & Society, 36(6), 904–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1768054

14.

Esping-Andersen

(1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.

15.

Foster

Wass

(2013). Disability in the labour market: An exploration of concepts of the ideal worker and organisational fit that disadvantage employees with impairments. Sociology, 47(4), 705–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512454245

16.

Gewurtz

R. E.

Langan

Shand

(2016). Hiring people with disabilities: A scoping review. Work, 54(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-162265

17.

Gillies

(2012). University graduates with a disability: The transition to the workforce. Disability Studies Quarterly, 32(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v32i3.3281

18.

Gjersøe

H. M.

(2016). Getting sick and disabled people off temporary benefit receipt: Strategies and dilemmas in the welfare state’s frontline. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 6(1), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.19154/njwls.v6i1.4889

19.

Gjersøe

H. M.

Strand

A. H.

(2021). The street-level organisation in-between employer needs and client needs: Creaming users by motivation in the Norwegian employment and welfare service (NAV). Journal of Social Policy, 52(3), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000933

20.

Goodall

Mjøen

O. M.

Witsø

A. E.

Horghagen

Kvam

(2022). Barriers and facilitators in the transition from higher education to employment for students with disabilities: A rapid systematic review. Frontiers in Higher Education, 7, 882066. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.882066

21.

Hadley

(2018). Students with learning disabilities transitioning from college: A one-year study. College Student Journal, 52(4), 421–430.

22.

Hall

(2004). Social geographies of learning disability: Narratives of exclusion and inclusion. Area, 36(3), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00227.x

23.

Hardonk

S. C.

Halldórsdóttir

(2021). Work inclusion through supported employment? Perspectives of job counsellors in Iceland. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 23(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.767

24.

Hvid

Falkum

(eds) (2018). Work and wellbeing in the nordic countries: Critical perspectives on the world's best working lives. Routledge.

25.

Jammaers

Zanoni

Hardonk

(2016). Constructing positive identities in ableist workplaces: Disabled employees’ discursive practices engaging with the discourse of lower productivity. Human Relations, 69(6), 1365–1386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715612901

26.

Jans

L. H.

Kaye

H. S.

Jones

E. C.

(2012). Getting hired: Successfully employed people with disabilities offer advice on disclosure, interviewing, and job search. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 22, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9336-y

27.

Kittelsaa

A. M.

Wik

S. E.

Tøssebro

(2015). Levekår for personer med nedsatt funksjonsevne: Fellestrekk og variasjon. NTNU Sammfunnsforskning.

28.

Lillestø

Sandvin

J. T.

(2014). Limits to vocational inclusion?: Disability and the social democratic conception of labour. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 16(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017419.2012.735203

29.

Lindsay

Cagliostro

Leck

Shen

Stinson

(2019). Employers’ perspectives of including young people with disabilities in the workforce, disability disclosure and providing accommodations. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 50(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180996

30.

Lipsky

(2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.

31.

Lundberg

C. S.

(2022). Is there an ableist paradox in frontline Workers’ success stories about disability and work inclusion? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.838

32.

Lysaght

Cobigo

Hamilton

(2012). Inclusion as a focus of employment-related research in intellectual disability from 2000 to 2010: A scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(16), 1339–1350. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.644023

33.

Mandal

Midtgård

T. M.

Mordal

(2019). Arbeidsinkludering. Med arbeidsgiverne på laget. SINTEF.

34.

McKinney

E. L.

Swartz

(2021). Employment integration barriers: Experiences of people with disabilities. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(10), 2298–2320. https://doi.org/https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/09585192.2019.1579749

35.

Mik-Meyer

(2016). Othering, ableism and disability: A discursive analysis of co-workers’ construction of colleagues with visible impairments. Human Relations, 69(6), 1341–1363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726715618454

36.

Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2014). Letter of intent regarding a more inclusive working life. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/departementene/asd/dokumenter/2016/ia_agreement_-2014_18.pdf .

37.

NAV (2023). Information about NAV’s services and benefits. https://www.nav.no/en/home/benefits-and-services/information-about-nav-s-services-and-benefits .

38.

Nordic Council of Ministers (2018). Action plan for nordic co-operation on disability 2018 to 2022. Nordic Council of Ministers.

39.

NOU 2004:5 (2004). Arbeidslivslovutvalget. https://www.regjeringen.no/contentassets/18f915ca200f43899d89c30e36d64eae/no/pdfs/nou200420040005000dddpdfs.pdf .

40.

Østerud

K. L.

(2020). Leading the way? State employers’ engagement with a disability employment policy. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, 11(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.122196

41.

Østerud

K. L.

(2022). A balancing act: The employer perspective on disability disclosure in hiring. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 56(3), 289–302. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-221192

42.

Østerud

K. L.

(2023). Disability discrimination: Employer considerations of disabled jobseekers in light of the ideal worker. Work, Employment and Society, 37(3), 740–756. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211041303

43.

Paetzold

R. L.

García

M. F.

Colella

Ren

L. R.

Triana

M. D. C.

Ziebro

(2008). Perceptions of people with disabilities: When is accommodation fair? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530701665280

44.

Petty

Eccles

Tunstall

Richardson

(2023). Shortlists of workplace support for autistic employees: A freelisting study in the UK. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 59(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-230040

45.

Proba Sammfunnsanalyse (2018). Arbeidsgiverperspektivet i inkludering (Proba-rapport 2018-12). https://proba.no/rapport/arbeidsgiverperspektiv-pa-inkludering/.

46.

Regjeringen (2018). Staten skal gå foran i inkluderingsdugnaden. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumentarkiv/regjeringen-solberg/aktuelt-regjeringen-solberg/kmd/pressemeldinger/2018/staten-skal-ga-foran-i-inkluderingsdugnaden/id2604917/ .

47.

Sullivan

(2023). ‘Pioneers of professional frontiers’: The experiences of autistic students and professional work based learning. Disability & Society, 38(7), 1209–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2021.1983414

48.

Taylor

B. J.

(2006). Factorial surveys: Using vignettes to study professional judgement. British Journal of Social Work, 36(7), 1187–1207. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch345

49.

Tøssebro

(2004). Introduction to the special issue: Understanding disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6, 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/15017410409512635

50.

Treischl

Wolbring

(2021). The past, present and future of factorial survey experiments: A review for the social sciences. Methods, Data, Analyses, 16(2), 141–170. https://doi.org/10.12758/mda.2021.07

51.

United Nations (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Treaty Series, 2515, 3. https://www.ohchr.org/en/instruments-mechanisms/instruments/convention-rights-persons-disabilities.

52.

United Nations (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda .

53.

Volckmar-Eeg

M. G.

Vassenden

(2022). Emotional creaming: Street-level bureaucrats’ prioritisation of migrant clients ‘likely to succeed’ in labour market integration. International Journal of Social Welfare, 31(2), 165–175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsw.12510

54.

Woodhams

Danieli

(2000). Disability and diversity – a difference too far? Personnel Review, 29(3), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480010324779

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.06 MB

Disability and the transition from higher education to employment: Exploring attitudes among Norwegian frontline workers towards work inclusion

Abstract

Background

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material