We performed a qualitative descriptive and analytical study, following the methodology known Expert Panel.
Objectives
To identify and analyze the main barriers faced by small construction enterprises and self-employed workers in managing asbestos risks during renovation and demolition work.
Methods
The study was carried out using the Expert Panel (EP) technique with a total of 10 professionals with extensive experience in the Construction and Occupational Risk Prevention Sector.
EP is a research technique in which a group of experts on the topic under study meet and reach conclusions and recommendations by consensus.
Results
This mineral poses a significant environmental and public health problem. The PE identified buildings, industrial facilities, and other locations where asbestos is still evident through visual inspection, and these are included representatively in this publication. Its use in small contractors and self-employed workers focused on minor works and renovations where there may be significant risks from these pollutants. Therefore, in Spain, the number of deaths from Mesothelioma in the last 20 years amounts to 6983 and the models’ other researchers add a multiplication factor of 3.8 to this, that is, for every death from mesothelioma, 3.8 more deaths are expected from another pathology associated with asbestos.
Conclusion
The experts conclude that there is a need for inventories of buildings and constructions where asbestos is present, more specific health plans and surveillance, as well as the need to implement public policies to encourage asbestos removal.
BernardoAPucheP. Todo Sobre el Amianto. Una Guía Visual, Málaga, Spain: Ediciones del Genal, 2019.
3.
Senior Labour Inspectors Committee. A Practical Guide on Best Practice to Prevent or Minimise Asbestos Risks in Work That Involves (or May Involve) Asbestos: For the Employer, the Workers and the Labour Inspector. Luxembourg: European Commission Health Safety and Hygiene at Work Directorate General—Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, 2021.
4.
FerrerJMartínezC. El diagnóstico de las enfermedades respiratorias causadas por el asbesto. Arch Bronconeumol2008; 44: 177–179.
5.
MAPFRE. Análisis Retrospectivo de la Exposición de Trabajadores del Sector de la Construcción Naval al Amianto y de su Relación Causa-efecto Con Patologías del Aparato Respiratorio. Valencia, Spain: UGT/MCA, FM/CCOO, 2008.
6.
National Toxicology Program. Asbestos. In: Report on Carcinogens. Fourteenth Edition. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program; 2016.
7.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Health Effects Assessment for Asbestos. September 1984. EPA/540/1-86/049 (NTIS PB86134608); 1984.
8.
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Arsenic, metals, fibres and dusts. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol. 100C. Lyon, France: IARC; 2012.
9.
O’ReillyKMAMclaughlinAMBeckettWS, et al.Asbestos-related lung disease. Am Fam Physician2007; 75: 683–688.
10.
PucheP. Amianto. Una Epidemia Oculta e Impune. Madrid, Spain: Los libros de la Catarata, 2017.
11.
WagnerJCSleggsCAMarchandP. Diffuse pleural mesothelioma and asbestos exposure in the North Western Cape Province. Br J Ind Med1960; 17: 260–271.
12.
MauleMMMagnaniCDalmassoP, et al.Modeling mesothelioma risk associated with environmental asbestos exposure. Environ Health Perspect2007; 115: 1066–1071.
13.
TarrésJAlbertíCMartínez-ArtéX, et al.Pleural mesothelioma in relation to meteorological conditions and residential distance from an industrial source of asbestos. Occup Environ Med [Internet]2013; 70: 588–590. Available from: https://oem.bmj.com/content/70/8/588.
14.
SelikoffIJNicholsonWJLangerAM. Asbestos air pollution. Arch Environ Health1972; 25: 1–13.
15.
OuryTDSpornTARoggliVL. Pathology of asbestos-associated diseases, third edition. Pathology of Asbestos-Associated Diseases, Third Edition. 2014.
VirtaRL. Worldwide Asbestos Supply and Consumption Trends from 1900 through 2003: U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1298. U.S. Geological Survey. 2006.
18.
McCormackVPetoJByrnesG, et al.Estimating the asbestos-related lung cancer burden from mesothelioma mortality. Br J Cancer2012; 106: 575–584.
19.
RamazziniC. Asbestos is still with us: Repeat call for a universal ban. Vol. 60, Occupational Medicine, 2010.
20.
National Institute of Statistics of Spain. Deaths According to Causes (Chapters) by Sex and Age Group. Madrid, Spain: National Institute of Statistics of Spain, 2020.
21.
United States Geological Survey (USGS). Statistics and information on the worldwide supply of, demand for, and flow of the mineral commodity asbestos [Internet]. National Minerals Information Center; 2023. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/periodicals/mcs2023/mcs2023-asbestos.pdf.
22.
Comisión de Seguridad y Salud Laboral del Consejo de Relaciones Laborales de Cataluña. Exposición Laboral a Fibras de Amianto en Cataluña. Barcelona, Spain: Consejo de Relaciones Laborales de Cataluña; 2018.
23.
DeBonoNLWardenHLogar-HendersonC, et al.Incidence of mesothelioma and asbestosis by occupation in a diverse workforce. Am J Ind Med2021; 64: 476–487.
24.
DouglasTVan den BorreL. Asbestos neglect: Why asbestos exposure deserves greater policy attention. Health Policy2019; 123: 516–519.
25.
ArmstrongBDriscollT. Mesothelioma in Australia: Cresting the third wave. Public Health Research and Practice2016; 26: e2621614.
26.
PereiraDLópezAJRamilA, et al.The Importance of Prevention When Working with Hazardous Materials in the Case of Serpentinite and Asbestos When Cleaning Monuments for Restoration. Appl Sci2023; 13.
27.
Parlamento Europeo y Consejo Europeo. Directiva 2009/148/CE del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 30 de noviembre de 2009 sobre la protección de los trabajadores contra los riesgos relacionados con la exposición al amianto durante el trabajo [Internet]. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea. 2009. p. L 330/28. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/ES/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0148.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística de España. Empresas por condición jurídica, actividad principal (grupos CNAE 2009) y estrato de asalariados [Internet]. Madrid, Spain: Instituto Nacional de Estadística de España; 2022. Available from: https://www.ine.es/jaxiT3/Datos.htm?t=39371#!tabs-tabla.
30.
Real decreto 396/86/2006. De 31 de Marzo, por el que se establecen las disposiciones mínimas de Seguridad y Salud Aplicables a los trabajos con Riesgo de Exposición al Amianto. Boletín Of del Estado2006; 86: 13961–13974.
31.
Council of the European Communities. Council’s 89/391/EEC Directive of 12th June 1989, on Measures Intended to Improve the Safety and Health or Staff at Work. European C. Luxemburg; 1989.
32.
European Parliament. Directive 2003/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 March 2003 amending Council Directive 83/477/EEC on the Protection of Workers from the Risks Related to Exposure to Asbestos at Work. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2003.
33.
European Commission. Summary of Expert Panel. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission, 2007.
34.
Anaya-AguilarCSuárez-CebadorMRubio-RomeroJC, et al.Expert perspective on health and safety determinants in wineries. Work2022; 71: 975–985.
35.
Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs. ORDEN TAS/ 2926/2002, de 19 de noviembre, por la que se establecen nuevos modelos para la notificací on de los accidentes de trabajo y se posibilita su transmisí on por procedimiento electŕ onico. BOE2002 [cited 2018 Apr 14]; 279: 40988–41013. Available from: https://www.boe.es/buscar/doc.php?id=BOE-A-2002-22650.
36.
Anaya-AguilarRSú arez-CebadorMRubio-RomeroJC, et al.Delphi assessment of occupational haz ards in the wineries of Andalusia, in southern Spain. J Clean Prod2018; 196: 297–303.
37.
Streiner & NormanGR. Health Measurement Scales. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
SchlünssenV, et al.The prevalences and levels of occupational exposure to dusts and/or fibres (silica, asbestos and coal): A systematic review and meta-analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2023.
40.
BonafedeMChelliniEBuganiM, et al.The psychological impact of asbestos exposure: risk perception and emotional distress among former workers in Tuscany. BMC Public Health2025; 25: 3424.
41.
TuncerKGomleksizM. Improving asbestos knowledge among demolition workers through training after earthquakes. Work2025; 81: 2215–2220.
42.
GBD 2023 Disease and Injury and Risk Factor Collaborators. Burden of 375 diseases and injuries, risk-attributable burden of 88 risk factors, and healthy life expectancy in 204 countries and territories, including 660 subnational locations, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. Lancet2025; 406: 1873–1922.
43.
GirardiPRigoniSFerranteD, et al.Asbestos exposure and asbestosis mortality in Italian cement-asbestos cohorts: dose-response relationship and the role of competing death causes. Am J Ind Med2024; 67: 813–822.
44.
WillisVJLevinJLNessimDE. A review of job assignments and asbestos workplace exposure measurements for TAWP mesothelioma deaths through 2011. Am J Ind Med2025; 68: 89–95.
45.
KurzhunbaevaZSpinazzèACampagnoloD, et al.Occupational exposure to chrysotile in an asbestos cement factory in Kyrgyzstan. Ann Work Expo Health2024; 68: 992–998.
46.
HernándezMPereiraDBloiseA. Asbestos: communicating the health issues derived from fibrous minerals to society. Appl Sci2024; 14: 8980.
47.
ArrandaleVHBerriaultCSongC, et al.Surveillance of asbestos related disease among workers enrolled in an exposure registry. Am J Ind Med2024; 67: 1077–1088.
48.
Walker-BoneKGoodwinMABuftonB, et al.Mesothelioma incidence rates in Australia since 1982: exploring age, period, and cohort effects and future projections. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev2025; 34: 1149–1155.
49.
GiraldoMZugnaDMiglioreE, et al.The evolution of an epidemic: age-period-cohort modelling of mesothelioma in Casale Monferrato, 1990-2021, with projections to 2042. Environ Health2025; 24: 79.
50.
BarbieriPGSomiglianaABMuranA, et al.Asbestos bodies and amphibole fibres in the lung: do the Helsinki criteria need an update?Ann Work Expo Health2025; 69: 832–842.
