Work-life balance (WLB) is crucial for occupational health, especially for bus conductors, who face high levels of stress and irregular schedules. Despite the extensive exploration of WLB across occupations globally, a pronounced research gap exists for bus conductors, notably in the Sri Lankan context.
Objective
The objective of this study was to develop and validate a context-specific WLB tool for Sri Lanka Transport Board (SLTB) bus conductors.
Methods
The tool was developed via qualitative methods (in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, and key informant interviews) and a review of existing tools, followed by pilot testing. Statistical analyses were conducted for exploratory factor analysis (EFA), whereas confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed using the lavaan package in R. The sample sizes for the factor analyses adhered to the established subject-to-item ratio guidelines, ensuring the statistical robustness of the psychometric validation.
Results
The tool showed high reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.784) and strong construct validity, as supported by EFA with 147 bus conductors and CFA with a separate sample of 100. It comprises 10 items with three dimensions, namely, work-family integration, institutional support and work satisfaction, and health and work interference, collectively explaining 75.7% of WLB variance.
Conclusion
This study provides a validated, context-specific instrument to measure the WLB of bus conductors, which can be used by relevant stakeholders to assess, compare, and improve WLB following targeted interventions, thereby enhancing the efficiency of public transportation bus services.
AruldossAKowalskiKBParayitamS. The relationship between quality of work life and work-life balance: mediating role of job stress, job satisfaction, and job commitment. J Adv Manag Res2021; 18: 36–62.
2.
DonaWMadhavikaN. Work-life balance in the non-HR employee perception: the case of FMCG companies in Sri Lanka. Int J Hum Resour Stud2019; 9: 266–276.
3.
SchädelC. Work-life balance among cruise ship crews: a quantitative research approach. 1st ed. Hamburg, Germany: Diplomica Verlag, 2012.
4.
PouloseSSudarsanN. Work-life balance: a conceptual review. Int J Adv Manag Econ2014; 3: 1–17.
5.
KumarasamyMAPPangilFIsaMFM. Individual, organizational and environmental factors affecting work-life balance. Asian Soc Sci2015; 11: 111–123.
6.
PadmasiriMKDMahalaekamgeWGS. Relationship between the personality type and work-life balance among academic staff of University of Kelaniya. Kelaniya J Hum Resour Manag2017; 8: 46.
7.
WagmanPHåkanssonCBjörklundA. Occupational balance as used in occupational therapy: a concept analysis. Scand J Occup Ther2012; 19: 322–327.
8.
CobbHRMurphyLDThomasCL, et al.Measuring boundaries and borders: a taxonomy of work-nonwork boundary management scales. J Vocat Behav2022; 137: 103760.
9.
GuestDE. Perspectives on the study of work-life balance. Soc Sci Inf2002; 41: 255–279.
10.
CohenAKirchmeyerC. A cross-cultural study of the work/nonwork interface among Israeli nurses. Appl Psychol2005; 54: 537–567.
11.
Mas-MachucaMBerbegal-MirabentJAlegreI. Work-life balance and its relationship with organizational pride and job satisfaction. J Manag Psychol2016; 31: 586–602.
12.
IllangasingheDKAlagiyawannaMAAPSamaranayakeDBDL, et al.Prevalence and associated factors of occupational stress among bus drivers of Sri Lanka transport board in Colombo district. J Coll Community Physicians Sri Lanka2021; 27: 411–419.
13.
KadamBS. Work-life balance: dilemma of modern society - a special reference to women bus conductors in maharashtra state road transport. ZENITH Int J Bus Econ Manag Res2012; 2: 8826.
14.
VijayalakshmiPVK. Work-life balance of women bus conductors in Andhra Pradesh state road transport corporation (APSRTC) in Visakhapatnam district. Int Res J Hum Resour Soc Sci2017; 4: 58–71.
15.
KabugadeRRUpadhyayP. Study the implication of health issues and work stress on work-life balance of lady bus conductors. Indian J Community Health2015; 4: 6–9.
16.
GunawardanaBMIWijesingheMSD. Exploring workplace stress in urban mobility: An analysis of Sri Lankan bus conductors via the effort-reward imbalance model. Asia Pac J Public Health2026; 38: 72–78.
SinghS. Measuring work-life balance in India. Int J Adv Res Comput Sci Manag Stud2014; 2: 35–44.
22.
ChitraBCParashuramaKG. Demographic factors and their influence on work life balance of KSRTC bus drivers. Int J Legal Res Stud2018; 3: 17–20.
23.
RincyVMPanchanathamN. Development of a psychometric instrument to measure work life balance. Cont J Soc Sci2010; 3: 50.
24.
StreinerDLNormanGRCairneyJ. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
25.
SpectorPE. Summated rating scale construction: an introduction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, 1992.
26.
BergBL. Qualitative research, message for the social sciences. 4th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001.
27.
LawsheCH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol1975; 28: 563–575.
28.
GjersingLCaplehornJRMClausenT. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol2010; 10: 1–10.
29.
AbramsonJHAbramsonZH. Research methods in community medicine: surveys, epidemiological research, programme evaluation, clinical trials. 6th ed. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2008.
30.
MacCallumRCWidamanKFZhangS, et al.Sample size in factor analysis. Psychol Methods1999; 4: 84–99.
31.
De WinterJCDodouD. Factor recovery by principal axis factoring and maximum likelihood factor analysis as a function of factor pattern and sample size. J Appl Stat2012; 39: 695–710.
32.
HendricksonAEWhitePO. PROMAX: a quick method for rotation to oblique simple structure. Br J Stat Psychol1964; 17: 65–70.
33.
CernyBAKaiserHF. A study of a measure of sampling adequacy for factor analytic correlation matrices. Multivariate Behav Res1977; 12: 43–47.
34.
FergusonECoxT. Exploratory factor analysis: a users’ guide. Int J Sel Assess1993; 1: 84–94.
35.
TaherdoostHSahibuddinSJalaliyoonN. Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Adv Appl Pure Math2014; 27: 375–382.
36.
TabachnickBGFidellLSUllmanJB. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson, 2007.
37.
LiCH. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behav Res Methods2016; 48: 936–949.
38.
HuLBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model1999; 6: 1–55.
39.
CronbachLJMeehlPE. Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychol Bull1955; 52: 281–302.
40.
AvadhaniVDMenonRB. Development and standardization of the work-life balance scale for the insurance sector employees. Cogent Bus Manag2022; 9: 2154994.
41.
FisherGGBulgerCASmithCS. Beyond work and family: a measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. J Occup Health Psychol2009; 14: 441–456.
42.
HooperDCoughlanJMullenMR. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods2008; 6: 53–60.
43.
NairMKaushikA. Evolving a psychometric instrument to measure work-life balance. IITM J Bus Stud2020; 7: 118–126.
44.
AllenTDChoEMeierLL. Work–family boundary dynamics. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav2014; 1: 99–121.
45.
ClarkSC. Work/family border theory: a new theory of work/family balance. Hum Relat2000; 53: 747–770.
46.
BulgerCAMatthewsRAHoffmanME. Work and personal life boundary management: boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation–integration continuum. J Occup Health Psychol2007; 12: 365–375.
47.
BakkerABDemeroutiEEuwemaMC. Job resources buffer the impact of job demands on burnout. J Occup Health Psychol2005; 10: 170–180.
48.
ParkSKRheeMKLeeSW. The effects of job demands and resources on turnover intention: the mediating roles of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. Work2021; 70: 301–309.
49.
KiremitciOBozBYıldız ÇakırL. Job demands-resources model and burnout in physical education teaching: a mixed-method sequential explanatory study. Work2023; 76: 171–187.
50.
GiahiOKhoubiJAmiriM. The association between insomnia and cardiovascular risk factors in bus drivers in Iran. Work2016; 55: 207–214.
51.
AraújoAVArcanjoGSFernandesH, et al.Ergonomic work analysis: a case study of bus drivers in the private collective transportation sector. Work2018; 60: 41–47.
52.
RashmiKKatariaA. Work–life balance: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Int J Sociol Soc Policy2022; 42: 1028–1065.
53.
HaymanJ. Psychometric assessment of an instrument designed to measure work-life balance. Res Pract Hum Resour Manag2005; 13: 85–91.
54.
KhatriPShuklaSThomasA, et al.Towards work life fulfilment: scale development and validation. J Bus Res2025; 186: 115006.
55.
Medina-GarridoJABiedma-FerrerJMRamos-RodríguezAR. Relationship between work–family balance, employee well-being and job performance. Acad Rev Latinoam Adm2017; 30: 40–58.
56.
BlomRJaspersEKniesE, et al.Family-friendly policies and workplace supports: a meta-analysis of their effects on career, job, and work-family outcomes. J Vocat Behav2025; 157: 104091.
57.
BanuARDuraipandianK. Development of an instrument to measure work-life balance of IT professionals in Chennai. Int J Manag2014; 5: 21–33.
58.
MaeranRPitarelliFCangianoF. Work-life balance and job satisfaction among teachers. Interdiscip J Fam Stud2013; 18: 51–72.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
