Rural Australians experience poorer health outcomes due to complex intersecting factors. Addressing these challenges requires skilled researchers embedded in rural communities. However, the distribution, work patterns, and demographics of PhD-qualified professionals in rural Australia remains largely unknown.
Objective
To examine the distribution of Australian PhD-qualified workforce across levels of remoteness to identify the current state of rural/urban research workforce distribution and characteristics.
Methods
Using 2021 Australian Census data, we analysed individuals whose highest qualification was a doctoral degree (PhD), excluding professional doctorates. Data were examined by Modified Monash Model (MM) levels of remoteness and included variable such as location, sex, age, industry, sector (private/public), income, and weekly hours worked.
Results
85% of PhD-qualified persons were based in cities (MM1) with decreasing representation across more remote MM levels. While the public sector (including universities) was the overall dominant employer, its presence decreased with remoteness, with the private sector becoming predominant medium rural towns onwards (MM4-7). The workforce was male dominated in more urbanised areas (MM1-3), reached gender parity at small rural towns (MM5), and became female dominated remote areas (MM6-7). Rural PhD holders (MM3-5) tended to be older than urban (MM1) and remote (MM6-7) counterparts. Income tended to decrease with remoteness, and hours skewed toward part-time or excessive workloads.
Conclusions
Improving rural health outcomes may require greater investment in the PhD-qualified workforce in rural and remote places. This includes addressing precarious employment conditions, lower income, and underrepresentation in the public sector.
CortieCHGarneDParker-NewlynL, et al.The Australian health workforce: disproportionate shortfalls in small rural towns. Australian Journal of Rural Health2024; 32: 538–546.
4.
World Health Organization. WHO guideline on health workforce development, attraction, recruitment and retention in rural and remote areas. 2021 [Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240024229.
5.
WeltonSWilsonMZelekB, et al.Research in place: the critical role of rural health research in Canada. Front Med (Lausanne)2025; 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1600660
6.
MoranAHainesHRaschkeN, et al.Mind the gap: is it time to invest in embedded researchers in regional, rural and remote health services to address health outcome discrepancies for those living in rural, remote and regional areas?Aust J Prim Health2019; 25: 104–107.
7.
StewartR. Enough seagulls! rural and remote communities need local researchers living, walking and talking with locals. Med J Aust2020; 213: 514–515.
8.
HayesKCoxonKByeR. Regional, rural, and remote healthcare: the case for spatial justice. Rural Remote Health2025; 25: 8580.
9.
SosinANCarpenter-SongEA. Reimagining rural health equity: understanding disparities and orienting policy, practice, and research in rural America. Health Aff2024; 43: 791–796.
10.
RongTRistevskiECarrollM. Exploring community engagement in place-based approaches in areas of poor health and disadvantage: a scoping review. Health Place2023; 81: 103026.
11.
KellyWBMacDermottSSpeltenE. A seat at the table: regional, rural and remote health research and impact. Aust J Rural Health2021; 29: 1002–1007.
Qualifications Framework Council. Australian Qualifications Framework. 2013.
14.
McCarthyPWienkM. Advancing Australia's knowledge economy: who are the top PhD employers?Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: CSIRO/ AMSI, 2019.
15.
CampbellJBuchanJComettoG, et al.Human resources for health and universal health coverage: fostering equity and effective coverage. Bull W H O2013; 91: 853–863.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: census dictionary: detailed information about Census variables, concepts and terms 2021.
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2025 [Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.
31.
FrayLGoreJHarrisJ, et al.Key influences on aspirations for higher education of Australian school students in regional and remote locations: a scoping review of empirical research, 1991–2016. The Australian Educational Researcher2020; 47: 61–93.
WongL-SECCKamelA. How central office leaders influence school leaders’ decision-making: unpacking power dynamics in two school-based decision-making systems. Peabody Journal of Education2020; 95: 392–407.
ChristianKJohnstoneCLarkinsJ, et al.A survey of early-career researchers in Australia. eLife2021; 10: e60613.
38.
TischlerCMcDonaldKDallamoraE, et al.Rurality and workforce participation: exploring the prevalence of part-time and insecure work in Grampians public sector roles. 2023.
39.
O’SullivanBCairnsAGurneyT. Exploring how to sustain ‘place-based’ rural health academic research for informing rural health systems: a qualitative investigation. Health Res Policy Syst2020; 18: 90.
ClimieREWuJHYCalkinAC, et al.Lack of strategic funding and long-term job security threaten to have profound effects on cardiovascular researcher retention in Australia. Heart Lung Circ2020; 29: 1588–1595.
42.
O'SullivanBGCairnsAGurneyTM. Understanding the field of rural health academic research: a national qualitative, interview-based study. Rural Remote Health2020; 20: 1–11.
43.
WendtSBayUMaidmentJ. Engaging with sea-change and tree-Change families over time. Social Work in Rural Australia. 1 ed. Sydney: Routledge, 2012, p.176–90.
44.
LiTDenhamTDodsonJ. Internal migration and settlement patterns in Australia's regional urban centres. Popul Space Place2024; 30: e2740.
45.
CampbellNKumarK. Importance of research higher degree training availability in rural and remote regions. Aust J Rural Health2021; 29: 306–310.
