The United Nations (U.N.) recognizes “Decent Work” as a basic human right. The components of Decent Work include four pillars defined by the U.N.'s International Labor Organization (ILO): basic rights at work, employment creation, social protection and social dialogue. The United States fares poorly in comparison to peer countries on multiple measures related to Decent Work.
Objective
The goal of this study was to describe 1) perceptions of decent work, 2) perceived barriers and opportunities to decent work, and 3) the role of public health in promoting and supporting decent work in the United States.
Methods
Key informants identified from a pool of local, regional, state, national, and international organizations addressing concepts relating to worker rights and worker health and safety in the United States were interviewed from May 2021 to March 2022. Responses were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results
Participants defined decent work in terms very similar to the ILO definition: providing a livable wage with benefits, job security, just, safe, sustainable, meaningful work. Several addressed opportunities for growth, work providing a sense of agency/autonomy/power, and contributing to overall health, social, and emotional well-being. Significant barriers identified included the absence of legal protection, low levels of collective bargaining, poverty wages, and a lack of affordable healthcare.
Conclusions
There is widespread recognition that the U.S. lags significantly behind other high-income countries in the regulation of working conditions. Public health can amplify a decent work strategy by emphasizing the relationship between work and health.
NiedhammerIBertraisSWittK. Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health2021; 47: 489–508.
Economic Policy Institute. State of Working America Data Library “Annual wages and work hours”. 2017.
4.
MyersSGovindarajuluUJosephM, et al.Changes in work characteristics over 12 years: findings from the 2002–2014 US national NIOSH quality of work life surveys. Am J Ind Med2019; 62: 511–522.
5.
LandsbergisPGarcía-RivasJJuárez-GarcíaA, et al.Occupational psychosocial factors and cardiovascular disease. In: Handbook of occupational health psychology. 3rd ed.Washington, DC, US: American Psychological Association, 2024, pp. 309–339. 10.1037/0000331-016.
6.
VahteraJVirtanenM. The health effects of major organisational changes. Occup Environ Med2013; 70: 677–678.
7.
ScalabrinASilvaATCDMenezesPR. Organizational justice and cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review. Cien Saude Colet2022; 27: 3517–3530.
8.
LundinAFalkstedtDLundbergI, et al.Unemployment and coronary heart disease among middle-aged men in Sweden: 39 243 men followed for 8 years. Occup Environ Med2014; 71: 183–188.
9.
AgbenyikeyWKarasekRCifuentesM, et al.Job strain and cognitive decline: a prospective study of the Framingham offspring cohort. Int J Occup Environ Med2015; 6: 79–94.
10.
KivimäkiMBattyGDPenttiJ, et al.Association between socioeconomic status and the development of mental and physical health conditions in adulthood: a multi-cohort study. Lancet Public Health2020; 5: e140–e149.
11.
KawachiIKyriopoulosIVandorosS. Economic uncertainty and cardiovascular disease mortality. Health Econ2023; 32: 1550–1560.
12.
NiedhammerIBertraisSWittK. Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: a meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis. Scand J Work Environ Health2021; 47: 489–508.
13.
VargaTVXuTKivimäkiM, et al.Organizational justice and long-term metabolic trajectories: a 25-year follow-up of the Whitehall II Cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab2022; 107: 398–409.
14.
WoolfSHAronLYDubayL, et al.How are income and wealth linked to health and longevity?Washington, DC: Urban Institute, 2015.
15.
AbdullaAMLinTWRospendaKM. Workplace harassment and health: a long term follow up. J Occup Environ Med2023; 65: 899–904.
16.
MatthewsTAPorterNSiegristJ, et al.Unrewarding work and major depressive episode: cross-sectional and prospective evidence from the U.S. MIDUS study. J Psychiatr Res2022; 156: 722–728.
17.
TheorellTHammarströmAAronssonG, et al.A systematic review including meta-analysis of work environment and depressive symptoms. BMC Public Health2015; 15: 738.
18.
HarrisKMWoolfSHGaskinDJ. High and rising working-age mortality in the US: a report from the national academies of sciences, engineering, and medicine. JAMA2021; 325: 2045–2046.
19.
WoolfSH. Falling behind: the growing gap in life expectancy between the United States and other countries, 1933–2021. Am J Public Health2023; 113: 970–980.
20.
RossMBatemanN. Meet the low-wage workforce. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 2019.
International Labor Organization. Report of the Director-General: Decent work. International Labour Conference, 87th Session. 1999.
23.
International Labor Organization. ILO Declaration on Social Justice for a Fair Globalization. 2008.
24.
International Labor Organization. Mainstreaming decent work in European Commission development cooperation: Guidance on monitoring employment and decent work in developing countries. Geneva: International Labour Office, 2013.
25.
United Nations. Promote inclusive and sustainable economic growth, employment and decent work for all. SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth. United Nations Sustainable Development. 2023. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/economic-growth/ (accessed December 31, 2023).
26.
International Labor Organization. Time to Act for SDG 8: Integrating Decent Work, Sustained Growth and Environmental Integrity. 2019.
HendersonK. Where hard work doesn’t pay off. Boston, MA: Oxfam America, 2023.
35.
Medel-HerreroADeeb-SossaNTorreiro-CasalM, et al.Documenting working experiences of agricultural workers in California. Int j Sociol Agric Food (Online)2023; 29: 15–34.
36.
FujishiroKAhonenEQWinklerM. Investigating employment quality for population health and health equity: a perspective of power. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 9991.
37.
DollardMFNeserDY. Worker health is good for the economy: union density and psychosocial safety climate as determinants of country differences in worker health and productivity in 31 European countries. Soc Sci Med2013; 92: 114–123.
38.
FormazinMDollardMFChoiB, et al.International empirical validation and value added of the multilevel job content questionnaire (JCQ) 2.0. Int J Environ Res Public Health2025; 22: 492.
39.
SiegristJWahrendorfM (eds.) Work stress and health in a globalized economy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. 10.1007/978-3-319-32937-6.
40.
BurrHBerthelsenHMoncadaS, et al.The third version of the Copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Saf Health Work2019; 10: 482–503.
41.
DobsonMSchnallPFaghriP, et al.The healthy work survey: a standardized questionnaire for the assessment of workplace psychosocial hazards and work organization in the United States. J Occup Environ Med2023; 65: e330–e345.
BenavidesFGSilva-PeñaherreraMVivesA. Informal employment, precariousness, and decent work: from research to preventive action. Scand J Work Environ Health2022; 48: 169–172.
Office of the US Surgeon General. Workplace mental health & well-being. Washington, DC: US Public Health Service, 2022.
46.
American Public Health Association. Support decent work for all as a public health goal in the United States. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 2022.
47.
OSHA. Heat Injury and Illness Prevention in Outdoor and Indoor Work Settings Rulemaking | Occupational Safety and Health Administration 2024. https://www.osha.gov/heat-exposure/rulemaking (accessed August 13, 2024).
Democracy at Work Institute. 2021 State of the Sector: Worker Cooperatives in the U.S. Democracy at Work Institute, US Federation of Worker Cooperatives. 2021.
55.
FazenLLandsbergisP. Evaluation of Work Stress in Democratically Organized Workplaces in New York. 2023.
AustBMøllerJLNordentoftM, et al.How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews. Scand J Work Environ Health2023; 49: 315–329.
SchultePAIavicoliIFontanaL, et al.Occupational safety and health staging framework for decent work. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 10842.
61.
SchultePASauterSLPandalaiSP, et al.An urgent call to address work-related psychosocial hazards and improve worker well-being. Am J Ind Med2024; 67: 499–514.
62.
DobsonMFaghriPLandsbergisP, et al.Re: schulte et al., “an urgent call to address work-related psychosocial hazards and improve worker well-being”: it’s time to develop a national regulation regarding work-related psychosocial hazards. Am J Ind Med2024; 67: 1050–1052.
63.
HowardJSchulteP. Managing workplace AI risks and the future of work. Am J Ind Med2024; 67: 980–993. Epub 2024 Sep 2. PMID: 39223704.
64.
NiehausSHartwigMRosenPH, et al.An occupational safety and health perspective on human in control and AI. Front Artif Intell2022; 5: 868382.. PMID: 35875192; PMCID: PMC9298546.
