An occupational hazard is any workplace condition that poses a risk to an employee's health. Occupational hazards are ubiquitous in the field of anesthesiology and often go underappreciated. These hazards warrant careful assessment and strategic preventative planning.
Objective
This narrative literature review examines the occupational hazards encountered by anesthesiologists and discusses evidence-based techniques to mitigate these risks. Facilitating the health and safety of anesthesia professionals protects not only the providers themselves but also enhances patient care by reducing the possibility of medical errors due to occupational fatigue, stress, and injuries.
Methods
A targeted search of PubMed and other databases (SCOPUS, Web of Science) was used to review the literature. Safety standard handbooks by the International Atomic Energy Agency, The Pan American Health Organization, The World Health Organization, and Food and Agriculture of the United Nations, were also consulted to provide the current guidelines for hazards discussed. Articles and information were included if they provided information about the occupational hazards of anesthesiologists or evidence-based prevention techniques for mitigating the hazards.
Results
The occupational hazards are classified into physical, chemical, and biological categories. Evidence-based preventive measures are proposed and examined for each category.
Conclusion
This paper examines the challenges faced by anesthesiologists by categorizing the physical, chemical, and biological occupational hazards. Each identified hazard is accompanied by evidence-based strategies to mitigate its impact. By illuminating these issues, increased awareness among healthcare professionals, policymakers, and the public can foster a collective effort to improve the safety of the work of anesthesia providers.
GurmanGMKleinMWekslerN. Professional stress in anesthesiology: a review. J Clin Monit Comput2011; 26: 329–335.
2.
SunHWarnerDOMacarioA, et al.Repeated cross-sectional surveys of burnout, distress, and depression among anesthesiology residents and first-year graduates. Anesthesiology2019; 131: 668–677.
3.
DiederichSLenzenH. Radiation exposure associated with imaging of the chest: comparison of different radiographic and computed tomography techniques. Cancer2000; 89: 2457–2460.
DagalA. Radiation safety for anesthesiologists. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol2011; 24: 445–450.
6.
WangRRKumarAHTanakaP, et al.Occupational radiation exposure of anesthesia providers: a summary of key learning points and resident-led radiation safety projects. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2017; 21: 165–171.
7.
WagnerJB. Radiation protection and safety in interventional radiology. Radiol Technol2020; 91: 431–443.
8.
CzarwinskiRCrickMJ. Occupational exposures worldwide and revision of international standards for protection. Radiat Prot Dosimetry2011; 144: 2–11.
9.
GogosSTouzellALernerLB. What we know about intra-operative radiation exposure and hazards to operating theatre staff: a systematic review. ANZ J Surg2022; 92: 51–56.
10.
HattinHC. Laser safety in health care facilities: a national standard of Canada. J Clin Eng1994; 19: 218–221.
11.
SlineyDH. Risks of occupational exposure to optical radiation. Medicina del Lavoro2006; 97: 215–220.
12.
AzadgoliBBakerRY. Laser applications in surgery. Ann Transl Med2016; 4: 52.
13.
CalderLAHérouxDLBernardCA, et al.Surgical fires and burns: a 5-year analysis of medico-legal cases. J Burn Care Res2019; 40: 886–892.
14.
WangRRKumarAHTanakaP, et al.Occupational radiation exposure of anesthesia providers: a summary of key learning points and resident-led radiation safety projects. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth2017; 21: 165–171.
15.
Saurel-CubizollesMJHaysMEstryn-BeharM. Work in operating rooms and pregnancy outcome among nurses. Int Arch Occup Environ Health1994; 66: 235–241.
16.
SmalleyPJ. Laser safety: risks, hazards, and control measures. Laser Ther2011; 20: 95–106.
17.
WamsleyCEHoopmanJKenkelJM. The role of the laser safety officer and laser safety programs in clinical practice. Aesthet Surg J2021; 41: NP1550–4.
18.
MacketyCJ. The laser committee: its role in quality assurance. Health Care Strateg Manage1984; 2: 14–16.
19.
RussellSWDinehartSMDavisI, et al.Efficacy of corneal eye shields in protecting patients’ eyes from laser irradiation. Dermatologic Surg1996; 22: 613–616.
20.
NguyenLSeeberNSchneiderSW, et al.Thermal eye injuries from dermatologic laser treatments-an experimental study. Lasers Med Sci2023; 38: 10.
21.
BehzadmehrRDoostkamiMSarchahiZ, et al.Radiation protection among health care workers: knowledge, attitude, practice, and clinical recommendations: a systematic review. Rev Environ Health2020; 36: 223–234.
22.
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation. Vienna 2018.
23.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION, FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS, INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY, et al.Radiation Protection and Safety of Radiation Sources: International Basic Safety Standards. Vienna 2014.
24.
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY. Occupational Radiation Protection. Vienna 2018.
25.
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). Report of a consultation on justification of patient exposures in medical imaging. Radiat Prot Dosim2009; 135: 137–144.
26.
AyoğluHAyoğluFN. Occupational risks for anaesthesiologists and precautions. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim2021; 49: 93–99.
27.
BrogmusGLeoneWButlerL, et al.Best practices in OR suite layout and equipment choices to reduce slips, trips, and falls. AORN J2007; 86: 384–394. quiz 395–398.
28.
ChangCTanJFogarty MackP, et al. Clinician safety in NORA. Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) Newsletter2023: 84–86.
29.
EstrellaEPGavinoSOJ. Flexor tendon laceration of the hand from opening a glass ampoule. BMJ Case Rep2022; 15: e250439.
30.
CarrarettoARCuriEFde AlmeidaCED, et al.Glass ampoules: risks and benefits. Braz J Anesthesiol2011; 61: 513–521.
31.
BayramzadehSAhmadpourSAghaeiP. The relationship between sensory stimuli and the physical environment in complex healthcare settings: a systematic literature review. Intensive Crit Care Nurs2021; 67: 103111.
32.
KwanSALynchJCDefranceM, et al.Risk of noise-induced hearing loss for orthopaedic surgeons. J Bone Joint Surg Am2022; 104: 2053–2058.
33.
TikkaCVerbeekJHKatemanE, et al.Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2017; 7. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.PUB4
34.
BajwaSSKaurJ. Risk and safety concerns in anesthesiology practice: the present perspective. Anesth Essays Res2012; 6: 14.
35.
Kennedy-MetzLRArshanskiyMKellerS, et al.Association between operating room noise and team cognitive workload in cardiac surgery. IEEE Conf Cognit Comput Aspects Situation Manage (CogSIMA)2022; 2022: 89–93.
36.
TsengLPChuangMTLiuYC. Effects of noise and music on situation awareness, anxiety, and the mental workload of nurses during operations. Appl Ergon2022; 99: 103633.
37.
GülşenMAydıngülüNArslanS. Physiological and psychological effects of ambient noise in operating room on medical staff. ANZ J Surg2021; 91: 847–53.
38.
ArièsPLamblinA. Insufficient sleep among Anaesthesiologists and Intensive Care Physicians: It’s time to wake up!Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med2020; 39: 749–51.
39.
WallaceMSAshmanMNMatjaskoMJ. Hearing acuity of anesthesiologists and alarm detection. Anesthesiology1994; 81: 13–28.
40.
DaveySLLeeBJRobbinsT, et al.Heat stress and PPE during COVID-19: impact on healthcare workers’ performance, safety and well-being in NHS settings. J Hosp Infect2021; 108: 185–188.
41.
TumramNK. Personal protective equipment and personal cooling garments to reduce heat-related stress and injuries. Med Leg J2020; 88: 43–46.
42.
HeinkeTLJosephACarrollD. Safety in Health Care: The Impact of Operating Room Design. Anesthesiol Clin2023; 41: 789–801.
43.
HoganLJHarveyRL. Creating a Culture of Safety by Reducing Noise Levels in the OR. AORN J2015; 102: e1–e7.
44.
Raghavendra RaoRS. Ergonomical aspects of anaesthetic practice. Indian J Anaesth2016; 60: 306–311.
45.
RileyCWilsonCAndrzejowskaI, et al.Reducing musculoskeletal pain in the operating theatre. BJA Educ2022; 22: 154–159.
46.
LeiferSChoiSWAsanatiK, et al.Upper limb disorders in anaesthetists - a survey of Association of Anaesthetists members. Anaesthesia2019; 74: 285–291.
47.
TavakkolRKaviEHassanipourS, et al.The global prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among operating room personnel: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Elsevier; 2020.
48.
AnsonJAMetsEJVaidaSJ, et al.‘Are we hurting ourselves?’ What is the prevalence of back pain in anesthesia providers?J Clin Anesth2016; 34: 502–506.
49.
FatoyeFGebryeTMbadaCE, et al.Clinical and economic burden of low back pain in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMJ Open2023; 13: Article 4.
50.
AriesMAartsMvan HoofJ. Daylight and health: a review of the evidence and consequences for the built environment. Light Res Technol2015; 47: 6–27.
51.
GrundgeigerTRoewerNGrundgeigerJ, et al.Body posture during simulated tracheal intubation: glideScope(®) videolaryngoscopy vs Macintosh direct laryngoscopy for novices and experts. Anaesthesia2015; 70: 1375–1381.
52.
LeeH-CYunM-JHwangJ-W, et al.Higher operating tables provide better laryngeal views for tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth2014; 112: 749–755.
53.
VanLANeiraM. HealthWISE - work improvement in health services - Trainers’ guide. International Labor Service2014: 1–128.
54.
VanLANeiraM. HealthWISE - work improvement in health services - action manual. International Labor Office2014: 1–178.
55.
SwerdlowBN. Surgical smoke and the anesthesia provider. J Anesth2020; 34: 575–584.
56.
ByhahnCWilkeHJWestpphalK. Occupational exposure to volatile anaesthetics: epidemiology and approaches to reducing the problem. CNS Drugs2001; 15: 197–215.
57.
DixonKDasguptaPVasdevN. A systematic review of the harmful effects of surgical smoke inhalation on operating room personnel. Health Sci Rev2023; 6: 100077
58.
AndersonMGoldmanRH. Occupational reproductive hazards for female surgeons in the operating room: a review. JAMA Surg2020; 155: 243–249.
59.
LiuYSongYHuX, et al.Awareness of surgical smoke hazards and enhancement of surgical smoke prevention among the gynecologists. J Cancer2019; 10: 2788–2799.
60.
OkoshiKKobayashiKKinoshitaK, et al.Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel. Surg Today2015; 45: 957–965.
61.
BaggishMSPoieszBJJoretD, et al.Presence of human immunodeficiency virus DNA in laser smoke. Lasers Surg Med1991; 11: 197–203.
62.
BardDVergerPChernobylHP. 10 years after: health consequences. Epidemiol Rev1997; 19: 187–204.
63.
IsmailSKhanFASultanN, et al.Radiation exposure of trainee anaesthetists. Anaesthesia2006; 61: 9–14.
64.
MillerDLVañóEBartalG, et al.Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol2010; 21: 607–615.
65.
Starke KRFriedrichSSchubertM, et al.Are Healthcare Workers at an Increased Risk for Obstructive Respiratory Diseases Due to Cleaning and Disinfection Agents? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health2021; 18.
66.
Pan American Health Organization. Safe Handling of Hazardous Chemotherapy Drugs in Limited-Resource Settings. 2013;1–62.
67.
CostarDMHallKK. Improving Team Performance and Patient Safety on the Job Through Team Training and Performance Support Tools: A Systematic Review. J Patient Saf2020; 16: S48–S56.
68.
TrimJCElliottTSJ. A review of sharps injuries and preventative strategies. J Hosp Infect2003; 53: 237–242.
69.
GreeneESBerryAJArnoldWP, et al.Percutaneous injuries in anesthesia personnel. Anesth Analg1996; 83: 273–278.
70.
MahamatGKenmoeSAkazongEW, et al.Global prevalence of hepatitis B virus serological markers among healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Hepatol2021; 13: 1190–1202.
71.
DhillonRSRowinWAHumphriesRS, et al.Aerosolisation during tracheal intubation and extubation in an operating theatre setting. Anaesthesia2021; 76: 182–188.
72.
WujtewiczMDylczyk-SommerAAszkiełowiczA, et al.Occupational hazards in anaesthesiology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther2020; 52: 400–408.
73.
YezliSBarbutFOtterJA. Surface Contamination in Operating Rooms: A Risk for Transmission of Pathogens?Surg Infect (Larchmt)2014; 15: 694–699.
74.
Van der MolenHFZwindermanKAHSluiterJK, et al.Interventions to prevent needle stick injuries among health care workers. Work2012; 41: 1969–1971.
75.
FloresMVCohenM. Preventing airborne disease transmission: implications for patients during mechanical ventilation. In: Noninvasive ventilation in high-risk infections and mass casualty events. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2014, pp.305–313.
76.
SuzukiANambaYMatsuuraM, et al.Bacterial contamination of floors and other surfaces in operating rooms: a five-year survey. J Hyg (Lond)1984; 93: 559–566.
