With the acceleration of coal mine intelligence transformation, new generation miners (NGM) are gradually becoming the main force of production. The correlation between their work alienation (WA) and unsafe behavior (UB) has become a core challenge of safety management.
Objective
This study aims to explore the influence mechanism of WA on NGM’ UB and test the mediating function of organizational identification (OI) and work engagement (WE) as well as the moderating effect of psychological capital (PC).
Methods
This study takes 355 NGM from Shanxi Datuhe Coking Co., Ltd in China as a sample, adopts the structural equation model and Bootstrap method to conduct data analysis, and examines the relationship between variables and their function mechanism.
Results
WA is significantly positively correlated with UB; OI and WE independently mediate this relationship, with empirical evidence of chain mediation under generational characteristics in high-risk industrial settings. PC significantly moderates the negative impact of WA on OI and WE, and individuals with high PC can effectively buffer the negative impact of alienation.
Conclusions
The study innovatively integrates PC theory with JD-R model, revealing WA affects NGM’ UB through OI and WE sequentially. PC buffers WA's negative influence on these mediators particularly in high-risk industries. Strengthening OI, enhancing WE, and cultivating miners’ PC can mitigate alienation's adverse outcomes, providing strategic insights for coal mine safety management.
Notification of the National Energy Administration on Further Accelerating the Construction of Coal Mine Intelligence and Promoting the High-quality Development of Coal (National Energy Administration Coal Document No. 38 [2024]), National Energy Administration, 000019705/2024-00137
DobrowolskiZDrozdowskiGPanaitM. Understanding the impact of generation Z on risk management—A preliminary views on values, competencies, and ethics of the generation Z in public administration. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 3868.
5.
WeimingGQingrenCZhengquanX. The difference of safety behavior between new generation employees and traditional employees[J]. Safety Environ Eng2015; 22: 140–146.
6.
RobbinsRUnderwoodPJacksonCL, et al.A systematic review of workplace-based employee health interventions and their impact on sleep duration among shift workers[J]. Workplace Health &Safty2021; 69: 525–539.
7.
NaiwenLXiaokaiF. Effect of sleep deprivation on miners’ risk perception: based on physiological experiment [J]. J Safety Env2024; 24: 1036–1043.
8.
ShiJJZhuXY. A study on the correlation between sleep quality and psychological health status among coal miners[J]. Chinese J Ergonomics2024; 30: 9–17.
9.
JacobsK. Importance of quality sleep on work performance. Work: A J Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation2024; 77: 719–720.
10.
YiXYunxueD. Research on the change of skill level of manufacturing posts in the era of robots–Case analysis based on the framework of “complexity-autonomy”[J]. Fujian Tribune (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)2023; 11: 148–165.
11.
XierwaADilinaerA. Mediating effect of job burnout between social support and presenteeism behavior in open-pit coal miners[J]. J Env Occupat Med2024; 41: 796–800.
12.
WeiweiXDaqingT. Research on assessment and countermeasures of miners'occupational mental health[J]. Safety Coal Mines2019; 45: 67–72.
13.
BinZLiuyeYHuiK. Characteristics and influencing factors of neurobehavioral function of coal miners[J]. J Env Occup Med2019; 36: 121–127.
14.
ShuichengTHongyanL. The effects of noise exposure duration on miners’ risk perception: Evidence from fNIRS[J]. J Mining Sci Technol2025; 10: 522–530.
15.
XiumingSYuchunS. The influence of work alienation on work performance–Chinese traditionality as the moderator variable[J]. Manage Rev2015; 27: 128–137.
16.
Garca-ContrerasRMuoz-ChvezJPMuoz-ChvezRL, et al.Work alienation, deviant workplace behavior and performance in public sector. Sustainability2022; 14: 10490.
17.
TummersLGDen DulkL. The effects of work alienation on organisational commitment, work effort and work-to-family enrichment. J Nurs Manag2013; 21: 850–859.
18.
LiWShuaiYChenggangZ, et al.SD Simulation Study on influence of incentive strategy on active safety behavior of miner groups[J]. Safety in Coal Mines2023; 54: 255–259.
19.
National Development and Reform Commission of the People's Republic of China. National Energy Administration. Energy Technology Revolution Innovation Action Plan (2016-2030) [EB/OL]. 2016.
20.
HanCJizuL. Research on intergenerational difference of miners’ change-supportive behavior driven by intelligence[J]. J Safety Sci Technol2022; 18: 12–18.
21.
LuMSirouL. Artificial intelligence anxiety and innovative behavior of new generation employees: the roles of organizational attachment and job crafting[J]. Sci Technol Progress Policy2025; 42: 132–140.
22.
GrinbergENachoumRKanat-MaymonY. The effect of basic psychological needs on healthcare professionals’ work-related psychological outcomes. Work: A J Prev Assess Rehab2025; 80: 1634–1639.
23.
BanaiMReiselWDProbstTM. A managerial and personal control model: predictions of work alienation and organizational commitment in Hungary. J Int Manag2004; 10: 375–392.
24.
YangXTianYFengK, et al.Signal game analysis on the effectiveness of coal mine safety supervision based on the affective events theory[J]. Complexity2020; 2020: 5710419.
25.
FidaRPacielloMTramontanoC, et al.An integrative approach to understanding counter productive work behavior: the roles of stressors, negative emotions, and moral disengagement. J Bus Ethics2015; 130: 131–144.
26.
JiangHChenYSunP, et al.Authoritarian leadership and employees’ unsafe behaviors: the mediating roles of organizational cynicism and work alienation. Curr Psychol2019; 38: 1668–1678.
27.
GagnéMDeciEL. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J Organ Behav2005; 26: 331–362.
28.
HuitingG. Research on the relationship between work alienation and counterproductive behavior: the moderating function of organizational ethical atmosphere[D]. Dalian, China: Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, 2013.
29.
EdwardsMR. Organizational identification: a conceptual and operational review[J]. Int J Manag Rev2005; 7: 207–230.
30.
MaelFAAshforthBE. Loyal from day one: biodata, organizational identification, and turnover among new comers [J]. Pers Psychol1995; 48: 309–333.
31.
Armstrong-StassenM. Determinants of how managers Cope with organizational downsizing[J]. Appl Psychol2006; 55: 1–26.
32.
EfratyDSirgyMJClaiborneCB. The effects of personal alienation on organizational identification: a quality-of-work-life model[J]. J Business Psychol1991; 6: 57–78.
33.
DukerichJMGoldenBRShortellSM. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder: the impact of organizational identification, identity, and image on the cooperative behaviors of physicians[J]. Adm Sci Q2002; 47: 507–533.
34.
ChamberlinMNewtonDWLepineJA. A meta-analysis of voice and its promotive and prohibitive forms: identification of key associations, distinctions, and future research directions[J]. Pers Psychol2017; 70: 11–71.
35.
ChengPJiangJLiuZ. The influence of perceived external prestige on emotional labor of frontline employees: the mediating roles of organizational identification and impression management motive. Int J Environ Res Public Health2022; 19: 10778.
36.
GuodongHXiaoyuW. The formation mechanism of organizational identification of Chinese local enterprises based on the perspective of confucian yuanfen[J]. Chinese J Management2023; 20: 473–482.
37.
ChenhuiZXinL. The influence of work alienation on cyberloafing—based on the perspective of self-control[J]. Jinan J (Phil Soc Sci Edition)2020; 42: 117–129.
38.
BanaiMWeisbergJ. Alienation in the state-owned and private companies in Russia[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Management2003; 19: 359–383.
39.
XiaolongTGullNAsgharM. Does perceived supervisor support reduce turnover intention? The mediating effects of work engagement among healthcare professionals. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation2023; 74: 1001–1013.
40.
YongfaSXinwenBXiaodongM. Effects of supervisor-subordinate guanxi and subordinate's traditionality on work engagement and job performance:a moderated mediation model[J]. Manage Rev2022; 34: 193–205.
41.
ZhiyiC. Research on the influence of miners’ work engagement on safety performance[D]. Xi'an, China: Xi'an University of Science and Technology, 2022.
42.
HaoWZhijieLHuiZ. Research on the correlation between organizational identity and job involvement of stuff in a tertiary hospital[J]. Psychological Monthly2024; 19: 22–24.
43.
LixinC. Research on the influence of leadership style on employee work engagement-the mediating function of psychological capital and the moderating function of organizational identification[D]. Beijing, China: University of International Business and Economics, 2023.
44.
FroneMRRussellMCooperML. Job involvement and employee health: a test of identity theory. J Occup Organ Psychol1995; 68: 1–11.
45.
JunlongLMengrongZPeiyaoX, et al.Research on the relationship between organizational support, organizational identification and work engagement of non-clinical personnel in public hospitals[J]. Chinese J Health Policy2018; 11: 64–68.
46.
GuangyuanHJinshengLShumingZ. How does authoritarian leadership affect employees 'work engagement? a moderated mediation model[J]. Finance Trade Res2024; 4: 87–96.
47.
WeiPLijuanHTingL, et al.Study on the mechanism of psychological capital influencing employees’ unsafe behavior–a moderated chain mediation model [J]. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics2024; 9: 103–112.
48.
SaleemMSIshaASNBBensonC, et al.Analyzing the impact of psychological capital and work pressure on employee job engagement and safety behavior. Front Public Health2022; 10: 1086843.
49.
NairNVohraN. An exploration of factors predicting work alienation of knowledge workers. Manage Decis2010; 48: 600–615.
50.
MaelFAshforthBE. Alumni and their alma mater: a partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. J Organ Behav1992; 13: 103–123.
51.
SchaufeliWBBakkerABSalanovaM. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study[J]. Educ Psychol Meas2006; 66: 701–716.
52.
JianglinKJianminSYongruiL. Psychological capital:Chinese indigenous scale's development and its validity comparison with the western scale[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica2009; 41: 875–888.
53.
NaiwenLQiuminJ. The Construction and Measurement of Unsafety Psychology Inventory for Miners[J]. Psychological Exploration2010; 30: 91–96.
54.
CronbachLJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika1951; 16: 297–334.
55.
HuLTBentlerPM. Cutoff criteria for t indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equat Modeling1999; 6: 1–55.
56.
JöreskogKG. A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika1969; 34: 183–202.
57.
BollenKA. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley, 1989.
58.
MackinnonDPFritzMSWilliamsJ, et al.Distribution of the product condence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN. Behav Res Methods2007; 39: 384–389.
59.
HayesAF. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press, 2013.
