The evolving corporate landscape necessitates innovation in workplace practices to maintain a competitive advantage. Agile Human Resource Management (HRM) is increasingly recognised as a driver of innovative work behaviour, particularly in the education sector.
Objective
This study examines the impact of agile HRM on innovative work behaviour in Pakistan's education sector. It explores the mediating role of employee value co-creation and the moderating effect of top management championship in this relationship.
Methods
A survey-based quantitative research design was employed, utilising snowball sampling to collect data from faculty members in private, public, and semi-government universities in Pakistan. Structural equation modelling (SEM) via Smart PLS 4.0 was used for hypothesis testing.
Results
The findings indicate a strong positive relationship between agile HRM and innovative work behaviour. Employee value co-creation significantly mediates this relationship, emphasising the importance of collaboration. Furthermore, top management championship moderates the relationship between agile HRM and employee value co-creation, highlighting the critical role of leadership support.
Conclusion
The study highlights the importance of agile HRM strategies in fostering innovation within the education sector. It provides insights for HR policymakers and institutions aiming to foster workplace creativity through adaptive HRM practices and strong leadership support.
ZhouWVelamuriVK. Key contextual success factors for employee innovative behavior: a study in a foreign manufacturing subsidiary in China. Cogent Bus Manage2018; 5: 1471770.
2.
AndrabiNFRainayeeRA2020Emotional intelligence and innovative work behaviour: A review. Int J Eng Manage Res10: 186192.
3.
DorenboschLEngenMLVVerhagenM. On-the-job innovation: the impact of job design and human resource management through production ownership. Creative Innov Manage2005; 14: 129–141.
4.
KomaraIBHartantoDBaridaM, et al.Problem solving technique based on trisilas culture to improve self-regulated learning (SRL) for students in the digital era. KONSELI: J Bimbingan dan Konseling (E-Journal)2024; 11: 169–178.
5.
Barba-AragónMIJiménez-JiménezD. HRM And radical innovation: a dual approach with exploration as a mediator. Eur Manag J2020; 38: 791–803.
6.
Hock-DoepgenMMontasserJSKleinS, et al.The role of innovative work behavior and organizational support for business model innovation. R&D Management2025; 55: 7–26.
7.
JiaoYTangCSWangJ. An empirical study of play duration and in-app purchase behavior in mobile games. Prod Oper Manage2022; 31: 3435–3456.
8.
JoYHongAJ. Impact of agile learning on innovative behavior: a moderated mediation model of employee engagement and perceived organizational support. Front Psychol2022; 13: 900830.
9.
HuzooreeGRamdooVD. Review of effective human resource management techniques in agile software project management. Int J Comput Appl2015; 114: 10–15. DOI: 10.5120/19972-1860
Perello-MarinMRRibes-GinerG. Identifying a guiding list of high involvement practices in human resource management. WPOM-Work Papers Oper Manage2014; 5: 31–47.
12.
KhanS. Exploring the firm’s influential determinants pertinent to workplace innovation. Probl Perspect Manage2021; 19: 272.
13.
HewettRShantzA. A theory of HR co-creation. Hum Resour Manage Rev2021; 31: 100823.
14.
AndersonNPotočnikKZhouJ. Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. J Manage2014; 40: 1297–1333.
15.
AagaardAAndersenT. How can HR practices support front-end innovation and increase the innovativeness of companies?Eur J Int Manage2014; 8: 488–505.
16.
ZhangYZhangJForestJ, et al.The negative and positive aspects of employees’ innovative behavior: role of goals of employees and supervisors. Front Psychol2018; 9: 1871.
17.
Al JafaHFraijJVárallyaiL. The role of agile management in HRM environment change. Agrárinformatika/J Agric Info2021; 12: 37–45.
18.
MunteanuAdina-Roxana. Leadership Development in the Public Sector in Romania: Learning from European and North American Strategies. Int J Soc Sci Hum Res.2025; 8: 2216–2226.
19.
BlomARosengrenSPerzonJ. Towards a better understanding of sustainability gaps in retail organizations. Int Rev Retail, Distrib Consumer Res2023; 33: 539–557.
20.
SalamSSeninAA. A bibliometric study on innovative behavior literature (1961–2019). Sage Open2022; 12: 21582440221109589.
21.
SeeckHDiehlM-R. A literature review on HRM and innovation–taking stock and future directions. Int J Hum Resour, Manage2017; 28: 913–944.
22.
JalalSJehangirMUllahZ. Organizational agility determinants and performance: a case of Pakistani telecommunication sector. Glob Region Rev2017; 2: 211–227.
23.
AgarwalaT. Innovative Hum Resour Pract and organizational commitment: an empirical investigation. Int J Hum Resour Manage2003; 14: 175–197.
24.
ChowhanJPriesFMannS. Persistent innovation and the role of human resource management practices, work organization, and strategy. J Manage Org2017; 23: 456–471.
25.
PrahaladCKRamaswamyV. Co-creation experiences: the next practice in value creation. J Inter Market2004; 18: 5–14.
26.
GrześB. Managing an agile organization–key determinants of orgnizational agility Zeszyty Naukowe. Organizacja i Zarządzanie/Politechnika Śląska2023; 160: 1–15.
27.
AdhikersaRKumorotomoWDjunaediA, et al.Impact of agile organization and leadership on employee experience: case study UPTD (technical implementing service unit) digital service center, geospatial data and information of west Java provincial government (Jabar digital service). Populasi2022; 30: 103–125.
28.
JoinerWBJosephsSA. 2006. Leadership agility: five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
29.
OlivierBH. The relationship between employee well-being and organisational effectiveness. SA J Ind Psychol2024; 50: 1–13.
30.
ArifinRPurwantiH. Examining the influence of leadership agility, organizational culture, and motivation on organizational agility: a comprehensive analysis. Golden Ratio Hum Resour Manage2023; 3: 33–54.
31.
HajarMAAlkahtaniAAIbrahimDN, et al.The approach of value innovation towards superior performance, competitive advantage, and sustainable growth: a systematic literature review. Sustainability2021; 13: 10131.
32.
DávilaGADos AnjosEC. Configurations of knowledge management practices, innovation, and performance: exploring firms from Brazil. Int J Innov Manage2021; 25: 2150065.
33.
LeeSMOlsonDLTrimiS. Co-innovation: convergenomics, collaboration, and co-creation for organizational values. Manage Decis2012; 50: 817–831.
34.
SarasvuoSRindellAKovalchukM. Toward a conceptual understanding of co-creation in branding. J Bus Res2022; 139: 543–563.
35.
FullinG. Front-line workers in the global service economy: overshadowed and overstretched in the fast fashion world. Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge, 2021.
36.
LafuenteEVaillantYRabetinoR. Digital disruption of optimal co-innovation configurations. Technovation2023; 125: 102772.
37.
BarahmaMBattourMAliKB, et al. (2021) The relationship between HRM strategies and sustainable competitive advantage: strategic agility as a mediating variable. In SHS web of conferences. EDP Sciences, p. 08008.
38.
ZhouYHongYLiuJ. Internal commitment or external collaboration? The impact of human resource management systems on firm innovation and performance. Hum Resour Manage2013; 52: 263–288.
39.
KosterFBendaL. Innovative human resource management: measurement, determinants and outcomes. Int J Innov Sci2020; 12: 287–302.
40.
TsetimJTAdegbeOBAgemaRJ. Knowledge management infrastructure capabilities and innovativeness of small and medium scale enterprises in Benue state. Nigeria. Saudi J Bus Manage Stud2020; 5: 216–225.
41.
OtooFNK. Human resource management (HRM) practices and organizational performance: the mediating role of employee competencies. Employee Rel: Int J2019; 41: 949–970.
42.
LeeJYParkSBakerR. The moderating role of top management support on employees’ attitudes in response to human resource development efforts. J Manage Org2018; 24: 369–387.
43.
BarneyJWrightMKetchenDJJr (2001) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. J Manage, 27: 625–641.
ButtDIHButtTMUllahDR. Restructuring compulsory education in Pakistan in the post-eighteenth constitutional amendment era: Insights from the region and developed nations. South Asian Stud2020; 28: 415–426.
46.
HambrickDCMasonPA. Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manage Rev1984; 9: 193–206.
47.
GiddensA (2014) Giddens’ Theory of Structuration. Routledge, pp. 201–221.
48.
Sadiq SohailMDaudSRajaduraiJ. Restructuring a higher education institution: a case study from a developing country. Int J Educ Manage2006; 20: 279–290.
49.
Moh’dSGregoryPBarrocaL, et al.Agile human resource management: a systematic mapping study. German J Hum Resour Manage2024; 38: 345–374.
