During the last decades, studies addressing the persistently large labor-market participation gap of people with disabilities have increasingly focused attention to the role of employers and their organizations. Relatively little attention has been paid to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).
Objective
The objective of this article is to deepen our understanding of predictors of the inclusion of people with disabilities in SMEs.
Methods
A survey was conducted among SMEs in the Netherlands. The survey focused on three groups of predictors of employing people with disabilities: general organizational characteristics, human resource practices, and capabilities, opportunities and motivations to employ people with disabilities.
Results
The most important positive predictors of employing people with disabilities in SMEs were size, capabilities and opportunities. HR recruitment and selection was negatively related to employing people with disabilities. Comparing small with larger enterprises we found that predictors for employing people with disabilities are not completely similar.
Conclusion
Given the role of SMEs as a resource of employment, and the notion that SMEs are not simply ‘small’ large organizations but have their own unique characteristics which may create specific challenges and opportunities for inclusion, future research of SMEs is recommended. Concerning HR practices our findings are inconclusive. The role of general versus disability-specific HR practices, the issue of inclusive versus exclusive effects of HR practices and the effects of individual versus bundles of HR practices are interesting topics for future research.
ChanFStrauserDMaherP, et al.Demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities: a survey of employers in the Midwest region of the United States. J Occup Rehabil2010; 20: 412–419.
2.
HabeckRHuntARachelC, et al.Employee retention and integrated disability management practices as demand side factors. J Occup Rehabil2010; 20: 443–455.
3.
HulseggeGOttenWvan de VenH, et al.Employers’ attitude, intention, skills and barriers in relation to employment of vulnerable workers. Work2022; 72: 1215–1226.
4.
IngoldJMcGurkP. (eds). Employer engagement: Making active labour market policies work. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2023.
5.
MurfittKCrosbieJZammitJ,et al.Employer engagement in disability employment: a missing link for small to medium organizations – a review of the literature. J Voc Rehabil2018; 48: 417–431.
6.
United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. 2006. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities | OHCHR.
7.
ShoreLClevelandJSanchezD. Inclusive workplaces: a review and model. Hum Resour Manag Rev2018; 28: 176–189.
8.
StoneDColellaA. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Acad Manag Rev1996; 21: 352–401.
9.
BeattyJBaldridgeDBoehmS, et al.On the treatment of persons with disabilities in organizations: a review and research agenda. Hum Resour Manag2022; 58: 119–137.
10.
WuJIwanagaKGrenawaltT, et al.Employer practices for integrating people with disabilities into the workplace: a scoping review. Rehabil Res Pol Educ2023; 37: 60–80.
11.
ShawLDarazLBezzinaM, et al.Examining macro and meso level barriers to hiring persons with disabilities: a scoping review. Env Cont Disabil2014; 8: 185–210.
12.
KerstenAVan WoerkomMGeuskensG,et al.Organizational policies and practices for the inclusion of vulnerable workers: a scoping review of the employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil2023; 33: 245–266.
13.
KarpurAVanLooySBruyèreS. Employer practices for employment of people with disabilities: a literature scoping review. Rehabil Res Pol Ed2014; 28: 225–242.
14.
Schloemer-JarvisABaderBBöhmS. The role of human resource practices for including persons with disabilities in the workforce: a systematic literature review. Int J Hum Resour Manag2022; 33: 45–98.
15.
CavanaghJBartramTMeachamH, et al.Supporting workers with disabilities: a scoping review of the role of human resource management in contemporary organisations. Asia Pacific J Hum Resour2017; 55: 6–43.
16.
HeeraSDeviA. Employers’ perspectives towards people with disabilities. A review of the literature. S E Asian J Manag2016; 10: 54–74.
17.
NagtegaalRDe BoerNVan BerkelR, et al.Why do employers (fail to) hire people with disabilities? A systematic review of capabilities, opportunities and motivations. J Occup Rehabil2023; 33: 329–340.
18.
BurkeJBezyakJFraserR, et al.Employers’ attitudes towards hiring and retaining people with disabilities: a review of the literature. Aust J Rehab Couns2013; 19: 21–38.
19.
BakerPLindenMLaForceS, et al.Barriers to employment participation of individuals with disabilities: addressing the impact of employer (mis)perception and policy. Am Behav Sci2018; 62: 657–675.
20.
JuSRobertsEZhangD. Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities: a review of research in the past decade. J Voc Rehab2013; 38: 113–123.
21.
MunsellEKudlaASuH, et al.Employers’ perceptions of challenges and strategies in hiring, retaining, and promoting employees with physical disabilities. Rehabil Couns Bull2024; 67: 177–189.
22.
BaconNHoqueK. The treatment of disabled individuals in small, medium-sized, and large firms. Hum Resour Manag2022; 61: 137–156.
23.
SepulvedaT. Barriers to hiring and accommodating people with disabilities in small and medium sized businesses: a scoping review. J Appl Rehabil Couns2021; 52: 104–114.
24.
European Commission. Annual report on European SMEs 2021/2022. SMEs and environmental sustainability. Brussels: European Commission, 2023.
25.
HarneyBGilmanBMaysonS,et al.Advancing understanding of HRM in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): critical questions and future prospects. Int J Hum Resour Manag2022; 33: 3175–3196.
26.
KerstenAvan WoerkomMGeuskensG,et al.A classification of human resource management bundles for the inclusion of vulnerable workers. Work2024; 79: 177–191. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-230314.
27.
Araten-BergmanT. Managers’ hiring intentions and the actual hiring of qualified workers with disabilities. Int J Hum Resour Manag2016; 27: 1510–1530.
28.
ChanFTanseyTIwanagaK, et al.Company characteristics, disability inclusion practices, and employment of people with disabilities in the post COVID-19 job economy: a cross sectional survey study. J Occup Rehabil2021; 31: 463–473.
29.
UlsteinJ. The impact of employer characteristics on sustaining employment for workers with reduced capacity: Evidence from Norwegian register data. Soc Pol Soc2023. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746423000027
30.
BruyèreSEricksonWVanLooyS. The impact of business size on employer ADA response. Rehab Couns Bul2006; 49: 194–206.
31.
MichieSAtkinsLWestR. The behaviour change wheel. A guide to designing interventions. London: Silverback Publishing, 2014.
32.
OlejniczakKSliwowskiPLeeuwF. Comparing behavioral assumptions of policy tools: framework for policy designers. J Comp Pol Anal2020; 22: 498–520.
33.
BoselieP. Strategic human resource management. A balanced approach. London: McGraw Hill, 2014.
34.
AppelbaumEBaileyTBergP,et al. (eds). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000.
35.
HoqueKWassVBaconN,et al.Are high-performance work practices (HPWPs) enabling or disabling? Exploring the relationship between selected HPWPs and work-related disability disadvantage. Hum Resour Manag2018; 57: 499–513.
36.
ScheidT. Stigma as a barrier to employment: mental disability and the Americans with Disabilities Act. Int J Law Psychiat2005; 28: 670–690.
37.
HemphillEKulikC. Which employers offer hope for mainstream job opportunities for disabled people?Soc Pol Soc2016; 15: 537–554.
38.
HoutenvilleAKalargyrouV. Employers’ perspectives about employing people with disabilities: a comparative study across industries. Cornell Hosp Q2015; 56: 168–179.
39.
BonaccioSConnellyCGellatlyI, et al.The participation of people with disabilities in the workplace across the employment cycle: employer concerns and research evidence. J Bus Psychol2020; 35: 135–158.
40.
BredgaardT. Employers and active labour market policies: typologies and evidence. Soc Pol Soc2018; 17: 365–377.
41.
VermeerenB. Influencing public sector performance: studying the impact of ability-, motivation- and opportunity-enhancing human resources practices on various performance outcomes in the public sector. Int Rev Adm Sci2017; 83: 717–737.
42.
VillottiPCorbiereMFosseyE, et al.Work accommodations and natural supports for employees with severe mental illness in social businesses: an international comparison. Community Ment Hlth J2017; 53: 864–870.
43.
SchurLAmeriMKruseD. Telework after COVID: a “silver lining” for workers with disabilities?J Occup Rehabil2020; 30: 521–536.
44.
CollCMignonacK. Perceived organizational support and task performance of employees with disabilities: a need satisfaction and social identity perspectives. Int J Hum Resour Manag2023; 34: 2039–2073.
45.
KensbockJBoehmS. The role of transformational leadership in the mental health and job performance of employees with disabilities. Int J Hum Resour Manag2016; 27: 1580–1609.
46.
HoutenvilleAKalargyrouV. People with disabilities: employers’ perspectives on recruitment practices, strategies, and challenges in leisure and hospitality. Cornell Hosp Q2012; 53: 40–52.
47.
Wiggett-BarnardCSwartzL. What facilitates the entry of persons with disabilities into South African companies?Disabil Rehabil2012; 34: 1016–1023.
48.
BuhariwalaPWiltonREvansJ. Social enterprises as enabling workplaces for people with psychiatric disabilities. Disabil Soc2015; 30: 865–879.
49.
BlonkLHuijbenTBredewoldF,et al.Balancing care and work: a case study of recognition in a social enterprise. Disabil Soc2020; 35: 972–992.
50.
MarianiMAl-SultanKDe MassisA. Corporate social responsibility in family firms: a systematic literature review. J Small Bus Manag2023; 61: 1192–1246.
51.
MaddenLMcMillanAHarrisO. Drivers of selectivity in family firms: understanding the impact of age and ownership on CSR. J Fam Bus Strateg2020; 11: 1–10.
52.
SingalMGerdeV. Is diversity management related to financial performance in family firms?Fam Bus Rev2015; 28: 243–259.
53.
GuerreroSCayratCCossetteM. Human resource professionals’ human and social capital in SMEs: small firm, big impact. Int J Hum Resour Manag2022; 33: 3252–3274.
54.
van BerkelR. Employer engagement in promoting the labour-market participation of jobseekers with disabilities. An employer perspective. Soc Pol Soc2021; 20: 533–547.
55.
AllenMEricksenJCollinsC. Human resource management, employee exchange relationships, and performance in small businesses. Hum Resour Manag2013; 52: 153–173.
56.
AudenaertMVan der HeijdenBConwayN, et al.Vulnerable workers’ employability competences: the role of establishing clear expectations, developmental inducements, and social organizational goals. J Bus Ethics2020; 166: 627–641.
57.
LepakDSnellS. Examining the human resource architecture: the relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations. J Manag2002; 28: 517–543.
58.
KonradAYangYMaurerC. Antecedents and outcomes of diversity and quality management systems: an integrated institutional agency and strategic human resource management approach. Hum Resour Manag2016; 55: 83–107.
59.
CorbièreMVillottiPLecomteT, et al.Work accommodations and natural supports for maintaining employment. Psychiatr Rehabil J2014; 37: 90–98.
60.
Diaz-FernandezMPasamar-ReyesSValle-CabreraR. Human capital and human resource management to achieve ambidextrous learning: a structural perspective. Buss Res Quarterly2017; 20: 63–77.
61.
MorgesonFHumphreyS. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J Appl Psych2006; 91: 1321–1339.
62.
NovakJRoganP. Social integration in employment settings: application of intergroup contact theory. Intellect Dev Disabil2010; 48: 31–51.
63.
AmeriMKurtzbergT. Small empires: how equipped are small business owners to hire people with disabilities?J Occup Rehabil2024; 34: 350–358.
