Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Effective workload management in education is crucial for student well-being with nature-based Virtual Reality (VR) interventions presenting a viable solution. Most publications primarily examined high-end VR devices with immersive Head-Mounted Displays (HMDs), leading to a study gap in areas with restricted access to advanced VR technology.

Objectives

This study explores the impact of a low-cost non-immersive VR environment on students’ workload and cognitive performance in an educational context.

Methods

The participants were divided into two groups: a control group using traditional screen-based tasks and an intervention group using low-cost VR tools. Subjective workload was assessed using NASA-TLX and the participants were further categorized based on their perceived workload levels. Objective physiological data, including heart rate variability (HRV) and galvanic skin response (GSR), were recorded, and cognitive performance was measured using the Pauli Test.

Results

The results showed no significant differences in physiological, psychological, or performance outcomes between the control and intervention groups, implying that non-immersive VR did not significantly affect stress levels. Due to the limited sensory engagement, non-immersive VR did not activate the body or engage cognition effectively.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the non-immersive VR intervention not sufficient to produce measurable cognitive impact. Future research is encouraged to investigate the potential of immersive VR environments, which might provide a greater sensory experience. In addition, longer exposure durations should be examined to enhance understanding of the effects on cognitive load, relaxation, and overall well-being in nature-based VR applications. Even though differences were not statistically significant, non-immersive VR still reduced stress and enhanced engagement.

Keywords

virtual reality exposure therapy cognitive performance mental fatigue heart rate variability nature-based VR

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Burov

Tsarik

. Educational workload and its psychophysiological impact on student organism. Work 2012; 41: 896–899.

Monakhov

. Normalizing the work-load at school: elements for reform. Prospects (Paris) 1985; 15: 173–187.

Wang

Siu

, et al. How and when resilience can boost student academic performance: a weekly diary study on the roles of self-regulation behaviors, grit, and social support. J Happiness Stud 2024; 25: 1–26.

Janice Gumasing

Jay Sesnorio

Louis Subido

, et al. Effects of academic workload on the burnout of students during online learning. In: Proceedings of the 7th North American international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, 2022, pp. 2386–2393. https://doi.org/10.46254/NA07.20220520

Karma

Kezang

Pema

, et al. Well-being and academic workload: perceptions of science and technology students. Educ Res Rev 2021; 16: 418–427.

Smith

. Student workload, wellbeing and academic attainment. In: Longo

Leva

(eds) Third international symposium, H-WORKLOAD 2019 Rome, Italy, vol. 1107. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp.35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-32423-0

Scully

Kerr

. Student workload and assessment: strategies to manage expectations and inform curriculum development. Account Educ 2014; 23: 443–466.

Rojas-Sánchez

Palos-Sánchez

Folgado-Fernández

. Systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis on virtual reality and education. Educ Inf Technol (Dordr) 2023; 28: 155–192.

Harris

Wilson

Vine

. Development and validation of a simulation workload measure: the simulation task load index (SIM-TLX). Virtual Real 2020; 24: 557–566.

10.

Hawes

Arya

. VR-based student priming to reduce anxiety and increase cognitive bandwidth. In: Proceedings - 2021 IEEE conference on virtual reality and 3D user interfaces, VR 2021, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.; 2021, pp. 245–254. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00046

11.

Omlor

Schwärzel

Bewarder

, et al. Comparison of immersive and non-immersive virtual reality videos as substitute for in-hospital teaching during coronavirus lockdown: a survey with graduate medical students in Germany. Med Educ Online 2022: 27: 1–7. 10.1080/10872981.2022.2101417

12.

Carreon

Smith

Frey

, et al. Comparing immersive VR and non-immersive VR on social skill acquisition for students in middle school with ASD. J Res Technol Educ 2024; 56: 530–543.

13.

Gullone

. The biophilia hypothesis and life in the 21st century: increasing mental health or increasing pathology? J Happiness Stud 2000; 1: 293–322.

14.

Guttentag

. Virtual reality and the end of tourism? A substitution acceptance model. Handbook of e-Tourism, Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05324-6_113-1

15.

Yen

. Effects of virtual reality natural experiences on factory workers’ psychological and physiological stress. Front Psychol 2023; 14: 1–8. 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.993143

16.

Chan

SHM

Qiu

Esposito

, et al. Nature in virtual reality improves mood and reduces stress: evidence from young adults and senior citizens. Virtual Real 2023; 27: 3285–3300.

17.

Yahaya

NAM

Rambli

DRA

Sulaiman

, et al. Design of game-based virtual forests for psychological stress therapy. Forests 2023; 14: 1–14.

18.

Seiz

Kweon

Ellis

, et al. Exploring the psychophysiological effects of viewing urban nature through virtual reality using electroencephalography and perceived restorativeness scale measures. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2023; 15: 1–16.

19.

Widyanti

Pratama

. Cognitive ergonomics. 1st ed. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2022.

20.

Hendy

Hamilton

Landry

. Measuring subjective workload: when is one scale better than many? Hum Factors 1993; 35: 579–601.

21.

Caesaron

Ardani

. Study of first and third person viewpoints in virtual environments: physiological and performance measurements. In: 3rd international conference on intelligent cybernetics technology & applications, IEEE, 2023, pp. 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICyTA60173.2023.10429030

22.

Rivera-Flor

Hemandez-Ossa

Longo

, et al. Evaluation of task workload and intrinsic motivation in a virtual reality simulator of electric-powered wheelchairs. Procedia Comput Sci 2019; 160: 641–646.

23.

von Janczewski

Kraus

Engeln

, et al. A subjective one-item measure based on NASA-TLX to assess cognitive workload in driver-vehicle interaction. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav 2022; 86: 210–225.

24.

Hidayat

Kartowagiran

Ayriza

. A multidimensional concept of mental workload: a systematic review. J Educ Health Commun Psychol 2022; 11: 833–850.

25.

Sahoo

Prusty

Rout

, et al. Mental stress detection using gsr sensor data with filtering methods. In: Udgata

Sethi

Gao

X-Z

(eds) Intelligent systems. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022, pp.537–548.

26.

Butmee

Lansdown

Walker

. Mental workload and performance measurements in driving task: a review literature. In: Bagnara

Tartaglia

Albolino

Alexander

Fujita

(eds) Proceedings of the 20th congress of the international ergonomics association (IEA 2018). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp.286–294.

27.

Wismer

Soares

Einarson

, et al. Laboratory performance prediction using virtual reality behaviometrics. PLoS One 2022; 17: 1–12.

28.

Kamińska

Zwoliński

Laska-Leśniewicz

. Usability testing of virtual reality applications—the pilot study. Sensors 2022; 22: 1–19. 10.3390/s22041342

29.

Birckhead

Khalil

Liu

, et al. Recommendations for methodology of virtual reality clinical trials in health care by an international working group: iterative study. JMIR Ment Health 2019; 6: 1–14.

30.

Azarby

Rice

. Understanding the effects of virtual reality system usage on spatial perception: the potential impacts of immersive virtual reality on spatial design decisions. Sustainability (Switzerland) 2022; 14: 1–24.

31.

Nacholas

. https://online.keele.ac.uk/virtual-realitys-impact-on-human-perception-and-the-world/ (2023, accessed 5 June 2024).

32.

Hart

Staveland

. Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol 1988; 52: 139–183.

33.

Thorp

Rimol

Lervik

, et al. Comparative analysis of spatial ability in immersive and non-immersive virtual reality: the role of sense of presence, simulation sickness and cognitive load. Front Virtual Real 2024; 5: 1–12.

34.

Komatsu

. The neural mechanisms of perceptual filling-in. Nat Rev Neurosci 2006; 7: 220–231.

35.

Alamäki

Dirin

Suomala

, et al. Students’ experiences of 2d and 360° videos with or without a low-cost VR headset: an experimental study in higher education. J Inform Technol Educ Res 2021; 20: 309–329.

36.

Asadi

Taheri

. Technology assisted language education tale enhancing peer assessment and engagement in online IELTS writing courses through a teacher’s multifaceted approach and AI integration. Technol Assist Lang Educ 2024; 2: 117.