Harmful alcohol consumption has significant negative implications for the workplace. The workplace offers a strategic opportunity for alcohol prevention due to the substantial time employees spend at work.
Objective
Utilizing a social-ecological framework, this study aims to investigate whether universal alcohol prevention strategies in the workplace are associated with employees’ alcohol-related perceptions or behaviors
Methods
A cross-sectional survey study was conducted in December 2019 using a web-based questionnaire distributed through the Laboratory of Opinion Research Citizen Panel. Participants included 2771 employed adults aged 16–80 in Sweden. Multiple- and logistic regressions were used to investigate significant explanatory factors.
Results
Having alcohol procedures, as well as having received information from a supervisor regarding how to act on concerns, were associated with a higher probability of being comfortable informing a supervisor of concerns. A restrictive alcohol culture was associated with lower threshold for perceived risk-free alcohol consumption. Having an alcohol policy only was not associated with any of the examined alcohol-related perceptions or behaviors when controlling for other factors.
Conclusions
Alcohol preventive measures can significantly influence employee perceptions of responsibility to act on concerns, and the feeling of being comfortable doing so. The findings support the integration of alcohol preventive measures at multiple levels within the workplace, as well as having a restrictive alcohol culture.
GriswoldMGFullmanNHawleyC, et al.Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet2018; 392: 1015–1035.
2.
ShieldKMantheyJRylettM, et al.National, regional, and global burdens of disease from 2000 to 2016 attributable to alcohol use: a comparative risk assessment study. Lancet Public Health2020; 5: e51–e61.
3.
RehmJImtiazS. A narrative review of alcohol consumption as a risk factor for global burden of disease. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy2016; 11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-016-0081-2
4.
TranKBLangJJComptonK, et al.The global burden of cancer attributable to risk factors, 2010–19: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet2022; 400: 563–591.
5.
DayERuddJHF. Alcohol use disorders and the heart. Addiction2019; 114: 1670–1678.
6.
RonksleyPEBrienSETurnerBJ, et al.Association of alcohol consumption with selected cardiovascular disease outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ2011; 342: 79.
7.
FroneMR. Alcohol and illicit drug use in the workforce and workplace. Washington, DC:American Psychological Association, 2013.
8.
PiddKKostadinovVRocheA. Do workplace policies work? An examination of the relationship between alcohol and other drug policies and workers’ substance use. Int J Drug Pol2016; 28: 48–54.
9.
RocheAPiddKKostadinovV. Alcohol-and drug-related absenteeism: a costly problem. Aust N Z J Public Health2016; 40: 236–238.
10.
ProperKIVan OostromSH. The effectiveness of workplace health promotion interventions on physical and mental health outcomes – A systematic review of reviews. Scand J Work Environ Health2019; 45: 546–559.
11.
BufquinDParkJ-YBackRM, et al.Employee work status, mental health, substance use, and career turnover intentions: an examination of restaurant employees during COVID-19. Int J Hosp Manag2021; 93: 102764.
12.
FroneMR. Relations of negative and positive work experiences to employee alcohol use: testing the intervening role of negative and positive work rumination. J Occup Health Psychol2015; 20: 148–160.
13.
KreitmanN. Alcohol consumption and the preventive paradox. Br J Addict1986; 81: 353–363.
14.
PiddKJBerryJGRocheAM, et al.Estimating the cost of alcohol-related absenteeism in the Australian workforce: the importance of consumption patterns. Med J Aust2006; 185: 637–641.
15.
EllingDLAlmquistYBWennbergP, et al.Effects of a multi-component alcohol prevention program in the workplace on hazardous alcohol use among employees. BMC Public Health2023; 23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16150-4
16.
YuvarajKEliyasSKGokulS, et al.Effectiveness of workplace intervention for reducing alcohol consumption: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Alcohol Alcohol2019; 54: 264–271.
17.
MorseAKAskovicMSercombeJ, et al.A systematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of workplace-based interventions for the prevention and treatment of problematic substance use. Front Public Health2022. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1051119
18.
BennettJBPattersonCRReynoldsGS, et al.Team awareness, problem drinking, and drinking climate: workplace social health promotion in a policy context. Am J Health Promot2004; 19: 103–113.
19.
LeeNKRocheAMDuraisingamV, et al.A systematic review of alcohol interventions among workers in male-dominated industries. J Mens Health2014; 11: 53–63.
20.
SpicerRSMillerTR. The evaluation of a workplace program to prevent substance abuse: challenges and findings. J Prim Prev2016; 37: 329–343.
21.
TinghögME. The workplace as an arena for universal alcohol prevention–what can we expect? An evaluation of a short educational intervention. Work2014; 47: 543–551.
22.
ItoCYuzurihaTNodaT, et al.Brief intervention in the workplace for heavy drinkers: a randomized clinical trial in Japan. Alcohol Alcohol2015; 50: 157–163.
23.
KhadjesariZFreemantleNLinkeS, et al.Health on the web: randomised controlled trial of online screening and brief alcohol intervention delivered in a workplace setting. PLoS One2014; 9: e112553.
24.
SieckCJHeirichM. Focusing attention on substance abuse in the workplace: a comparison of three workplace interventions. J Workplace Behav Health2010; 25: 72–87.
25.
FellbaumLMojzischABielefeldL, et al.The effectiveness of workplace interventions for the prevention of alcohol use: a meta-analysis. Addiction2023; 118: 2043–2061.
26.
BronfenbrennerU. Toward an experimental ecology of human development. Am Psychologist1977; 32: 513–531.
27.
McleroyKRBibeauDStecklerA, et al.An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Educ Behav1988; 15: 351–377.
28.
GoldenSDEarpJAL. Social ecological approaches to individuals and their contexts : twenty years of health education & behavior health promotion interventions. Health Educ Behav2012; 39: 364–372.
29.
GruenewaldPJRemerLGLascalaEA. Testing a social ecological model of alcohol use: the California 50-city study. Addiction2014; 109: 736–745.
30.
TavakolMDennickR. Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. Int J Med Educ2011; 2: 53–55.
31.
Statistics Sweden. SNI 2007 : standard för svensk näringsgrensindelning 2007 = SNI 2007 : Swedish standard industrial classification 2007. Statistiska centralbyrån2007; 2: 7–397.
32.
AmesGMGrubeJWMooreRS. Social control and workplace drinking norms: a comparison of two organizational cultures. J Stud Alcohol2000; 61: 203–219.
33.
HodginsDCWilliamsRMunroG, et al.Workplace responsibility, stress, alcohol availability and norms as predictors of alcohol consumption-related problems among employed workers. Subst Use Misuse2009; 44: 2069–2062.
34.
RocheAMChapmanJDuraisingamV, et al.Construction workers’ alcohol use, knowledge, perceptions of risk and workplace norms. Drug Alcohol Rev2020; 39: 941–949.
35.
DelaneyWPAmesG. Work team attitudes, drinking norms, and workplace drinking. J Drug Issues1995; 25: 275–290.
36.
AmesGMJanesC. A cultural approach to conceptualizing alcohol and the workplace. Alcohol Res1992; 16: 112.
37.
InceogluIThomasGChuC, et al.Leadership behavior and employee well-being: an integrated review and a future research agenda. Leadersh Q2018; 29: 179–202.
38.
KellowayEKBarlingJ. Leadership development as an intervention in occupational health psychology. Work Stress2010; 24: 260–279.
39.
MontanoDReeskeAFrankeF, et al.Leadership, followers’ mental health and job performance in organizations: a comprehensive meta-analysis from an occupational health perspective. J Organ Behav2017; 38: 327–350.
40.
NewmanADonohueREvaN. Psychological safety: a systematic review of the literature. Hum Resourc Manage Rev2017; 27: 521–535.
41.
EaglyAHWoodW. The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. Am Psychologist1999; 54: 408–423.
42.
SladeTChapmanCSwiftW, et al.Birth cohort trends in the global epidemiology of alcohol use and alcohol-related harms in men and women: systematic review and metaregression. BMJ Open2016; 6: e011827.
43.
CharlesSTCarstensenLL. Social and emotional aging. Annu Rev Psychol2010; 61: 383–409.
