The ongoing fourth industrial revolution, characterized by the integration of intelligent machines, presents a transformative shift in the nature of work. Unlike past industrial revolutions that reshaped job dynamics, the current reliance on intelligent machines introduces new complexities. It is challenging to determine whether the adoption of intelligent machines fosters active engagement or diminishes motivation of employees.
Objective
This paper explores how the adoption of intelligent machines affects employee work engagement. We aim to identify the key combinations of factors influencing work engagement amidst technological integration by utilizing a supportive ecosystem perspective.
Methods
We employed fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to examine the interplay of seven factors: challenge stressors, leadership empowerment behavior, technology dependence, relationship dependence, emotional dependence, benefit dependence, and growth need strength. This approach addresses the limitations of previous research by considering the interdependencies and non-linear relationships among these factors.
Results
Our study reveals diverse configurations that influence work engagement. The fsQCA analysis uncovers multiple pathways through which the identified factors interact to impact work engagement, providing a nuanced understanding of the conditions that foster employee engagement in the era of AI.
Conclusions
Theoretically, this study contributes to the literature by elucidating multiple configurations that influence work engagement, highlighting the importance of a supportive ecosystem perspective in understanding employee behavior in technologically advanced workplaces. The findings also offer empirical insights to guide managerial interventions aimed at fostering employee engagement in the AI era.
TangPMKoopmanJYamKC, et al.The self-regulatory consequences of dependence on intelligent machines at work: evidence from field and experimental studies. Hum Resour Manage2023; 62: 721–744.
2.
KaplanAHaenleinM. Rulers of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence. Bus Horiz2020; 63: 37–50.
3.
BrynjolfssonEMcAfeeA. The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 2014.
4.
De CremerDNarayananDDeppelerA, et al.The road to a human-centred digital society: opportunities, challenges and responsibilities for humans in the age of machine. AI Ethics2022; 2: 579–583.
5.
AllenRChoudhuryP. Algorithm-augmented work and domain experience: the countervailing forces of ability and aversion. Organ Sci2022; 33: 149–169.
6.
DavenportTH. The AI advantage: How to put the artificial intelligence revolution to work. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.
7.
KnightCPattersonMDawsonJ. Building work engagement: a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the effectiveness of work engagement interventions. J Organ Behav2017; 38: 792–812.
8.
AlasfoorFHamdanA. Artificial intelligence, HR systems and engage employees: A LITERATURE REVIew. In: El Khoury R and Nasrallah N (eds) Emerging trends and innovation in business and finance. Contributions to management science. Singapore: Springer, 2023, pp.488–494.
9.
RaginCC. Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
10.
RaginCC. Redisigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2008.
11.
SchaufeliWBBakkerABSalanovaM. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Meas2006; 66: 701–716.
12.
CavanaughMABoswellWRRoehlingMV,et al.An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among U.S. Managers. J Appl Psychol2000; 85: 65–74.
13.
AhearneMMathieuJRappA. To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance. J Appl Psychol2005; 90: 945–955.
14.
LuoGZhangLJiaoL,et al.Research on the relationship between organizational dependence, work engagement, and innovative performance: taking R&D personnel in high-tech enterprises as the research object. J Qingdao Univ Sci Technol (Soc Sci Ed)2021; 37: 49–55.
15.
HackmanJROldhamGR. Work redesign. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley, 1980.
16.
KimWKolbJAKimT. The relationship between work engagement and performance: a review of empirical literature and a proposed research agenda. Hum Resour Dev Rev2013; 12: 248–276.
17.
LeiterMPBakkerAB. Work engagement: introduction. In: Bakker AB and Leiter MP (eds) Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research. New York: Psychology Press, 2010, pp.1–9.
18.
RosenCCDimotakisNColeMS, et al.When challenges hinder: an investigation of when and how challenge stressors impact employee outcomes. J Appl Psychol2020; 105: 1181–1206.
19.
MittalSMahendraSSanapV,et al.How can machine learning be used in stress management: a systematic literature review of applications in workplaces and education. Int J Inf Manag Data Insights2022; 2: 100110.
20.
MentisAFLeeDRoussosP. Applications of artificial intelligence−machine learning for detection of stress: a critical overview. Mol Psychiatry2023; 29: 1882–1894.
21.
FrickNRMirbabaieMStieglitzS,et al.Maneuvering through the stormy seas of digital transformation: the impact of empowering leadership on the AI readiness of enterprises. J Decis Syst2021; 30: 235–258.
22.
MolinoMCorteseCGGhislieriC. The promotion of technology acceptance and work engagement in industry 4.0: from personal resources to information and training. Int J Environ Res Public Health2020; 17: 2438.
23.
WoodJKimWKhanGF. Work engagement in organizations: a social network analysis of the domain. Scientometrics2016; 109: 317–336.
24.
AhmedUMajidAHZinMM. Moderation of meaningful work on the relationship of supervisor support and coworker support with work engagement. East Asian J Bus Manag2016; 6: 15–20.
25.
ShinYHurWMChoiWH. Coworker support as a double-edged sword: a moderated mediation model of job crafting, work engagement, and job performance. Int J Hum Resour Manag2020; 31: 1417–1438.
26.
EldorL. Work engagement: toward a general theoretical enriching model. Hum Resour Dev Rev2016; 15: 317–339.
27.
AhmedUAwangZHoqueAS, et al.The mediating role of meaningful work between career growth opportunities and work engagement. Int J Acad Res Bus Soc Sci2018; 8: 50–68.
28.
WangPKimSKimM. Robot anthropomorphism and job insecurity: the role of social comparison. J Bus Res2023; 164: 114003.
29.
BrislinRWLonnerWJThorndikeRM. Cross-cultural research models. New York: Wiley, 1973.
30.
DuYZJiaLD. Configuration perspective and qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): a new way of management research. Manag World2017; 6: 155–167.
31.
MaoQXuAJ. A comparative study of qualitative comparative analysis and regression analysis. Mod Bus Trade Ind2018; 32: 222–223.
32.
ShanSN. College marxist education on contemporary college students’ innovation and entrepreneurship influence of values: qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) based on 8 entrepreneurial cases. Res Coll Stud Aff2019; 2: 17–25.
33.
GligorDBozkurtS. FsQCA versus regression: the context of customer engagement. J Retail Consum Serv2020; 52: 101929.
34.
RihouxBRaginCC. Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009.
35.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY,et al.Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol2003; 88: 879–903.
36.
KleinLLVieiraKMAlvesAC,et al.Demystifying the eighth lean waste: a knowledge waste scale. Int J Qual Reliab Manag2023; 40: 1876–1898.
37.
FissPC. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Acad Manag J2011; 54: 393–420.
38.
StroeSParidaVWincentJ. Effectuation or causation: an fsQCA analysis of entrepreneurial passion, risk perception, and self-efficacy. J Bus Res2018; 89: 265–272.
39.
SchneiderMRSchulze-BentropCPaunescuM. Mapping the institutional capital of high-tech firms: a fuzzy-set analysis of capitalist variety and export performance. J Int Bus Stud2010; 41: 246–266.
40.
SchneiderCQWagemannC. Set-Theoretic methods for the social sciences: A guide to qualitative comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
41.
ZhuXWangSHeQ. Impact of skill requirements on employees’ thriving at work: from the perspective of artificial intelligence embedding. Foreign Econ Manag2021; 43: 15–25.
42.
LeeAWillisSTianAW. Empowering leadership: a meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. J Organ Behav2018; 39: 306–325.
43.
GaoYLiuH. How to enhance psychological security of enterprise employees during the COVID-19 pandemic: based on MRA and fsQCA. Curr Psychol2022; 24: 1–16.
