The application scope of artificial intelligence (AI) in libraries is gradually expanding, inevitably exerting certain influences on library professionals, which has significant management and development implications. Based on job demands-resources model and coping theory, using a questionnaire survey of 392 librarians from China, this study investigated librarians’ perceptions of the impact of AI on their work, analyzed factors influencing librarians’ work engagement, and constructed a stress coping mechanism of librarians toward AI application. Descriptive statistical analysis, multiple linear regression method and structural equation model method were used to test the hypotheses. The results indicate that in the context of AI applied in libraries, librarians generally adopt a proactive stress coping mechanism toward AI, perceiving its support effect more than substitution effect. Job demands, organizational support, and librarians’ AI literacy all exert positive influences on their work engagement, with organizational support emerging as the strongest predictor. However, problems of lower support quality of AI, low level of librarians’ AI literacy, insufficient AI-related training resources provided by libraries, and concerns about future employment prospects still exist. Understanding the professional impacts of technological applications is essential for the library industry and its professionals to cope with the career changes in the AI era.
AjaniYATellaASalawuKY, et al. (2022) Perspectives of librarians on awareness and readiness of academic libraries to integrate artificial intelligence for library operations and services in Nigeria. Internet Reference Services Quarterly26(4): 213–230.
2.
Al-AamriJHOsmanNEE (2021) Artificial intelligence abilities to support library services. In: 2021 22nd International Arab conference on information technology (ACIT), Muscat, Oman, 21–23 December 2021, pp. 1–7.
BakkerABDemeroutiE (2007) The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology22(3): 309–328.
6.
BalaHVenkateshV (2016) Adaptation to information technology: A holistic nomological network from implementation to job outcomes. Management Science62(1): 156–179.
7.
BellGBurgessJThomasJ, et al. (2023) Rapid response information report: Generative AI - language models (LLMs) and multimodal foundation models (MFMs). Report, Australian Council of Learned Academies.
8.
BhattacherjeeADavisCJConnollyAJ, et al. (2018) User response to mandatory IT use: A coping theory perspective. European Journal of Information Systems27(4): 395–414.
9.
ÇakmakTEroğluŞ (2025) The use of artificial intelligence in university libraries in Türkiye: Practices, and perspectives of library directors. Information Development41(3): 642–655.
10.
CarlsonJPVincentLHHardestyDM, et al. (2009) Objective and subjective knowledge relationships: A quantitative analysis of consumer research findings. Journal of Consumer Research35(5): 864–876.
11.
ChenCZhangJZhangY (2020) Relation of work motivation to work engagement and psychological well-being in employee. Chinese Mental Health Journal34(1): 51–55.
12.
ChiuYTZhuYQCorbettJ (2021) In the hearts and minds of employees: A model of pre-adoptive appraisal toward artificial intelligence in organizations. International Journal of Information Management60: 102379.
CokelyETKelleyCMGilchristAL (2006) Sources of individual differences in working memory: Contributions of strategy to capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review13(6): 991–997.
16.
CoxA (2021) The impact of AI, machine learning, automation and robotics on the information professions. Report, CILIP.
17.
CoxA (2023) How artificial intelligence might change academic library work: Applying the competencies literature and the theory of the professions. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology74(3): 367–380.
18.
CoxA (2024) Developing a library strategic response to artificial intelligence (version 1). Report, University of Sheffield.
19.
CoxAMPinfieldSRutterS (2018) The intelligent library: Thought leaders’ views on the likely impact of artificial intelligence on academic libraries. Library Hi Tech37(3): 418–435.
20.
de LeonLCRFloresLVAlomoARL (2024) Artificial intelligence and Filipino academic librarians: Perceptions, challenges and opportunities. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association73(1): 66–83.
21.
DemeroutiEBakkerAB (2011) The job demands–resources model: Challenges for future research. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology37(2): 9.
22.
DemeroutiEBakkerABNachreinerF, et al. (2001) The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology86(3): 499–512.
23.
DezuanniMOsmanKBurtonA, et al. (2024) IFLA trend report 2024: Facing the future of information with confidence: Phase 2. Report, Digital Media Research Centre.
24.
EspedidoASearleBJGriffinB (2020) Peers, proactivity, and problem-solving: A multilevel study of team impacts on stress appraisals of problem-solving demands. Work and Stress34(3): 219–237.
25.
FengCChenJGaoP (2024) Whether AI has reached the singularity: Data analysis and reflection on the probability of LIS occupations being completely replaced by AI. Documentation, Information and Knowledge41(4): 42–56.
26.
FreyCBOsborneMA (2017) The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation?Technological Forecasting and Social Change114: 254–280.
27.
FuYX (2018) Research on application of artificial intelligence in library construction. Library Work and Study 79(9): 47–51.
28.
GajbhiyeCK (2024) Impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in library services. International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research6(3): 1–13.
29.
Gonzalez-MuléEKimMRyuJW (2021) A meta-analytic test of multiplicative and additive models of job demands, resources, and stress. Journal of Applied Psychology106(9): 1391–1411.
30.
HervieuxSWheatleyA (2021) Perceptions of artificial intelligence: A survey of academic librarians in Canada and the United States. Journal of Academic Librarianship47(1): 102270.
31.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2025a) IFLA AI entry point for libraries and AI. Available at: repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/4034 (assessed 30 October 2025).
32.
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (2025b) A skills agenda for the trend report. Available at: repository.ifla.org/handle/20.500.14598/3837 (assessed 30 October 2025).
33.
JiangFWangZ (2022) Applications of cognitive appraisal theory of stress in managerial psychology research: Scenes, methods, and myths. Advances in Psychological Science30(12): 2825–2845.
34.
JiangHSunPHeL (2012) Empirical study of influencing of job resources to R&D staff’s work engagement: The mediating role of psychological capital. Science & Technology Progress and Policy29(6): 137–141.
35.
KahnWA (1990) Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal33(4): 692–724.
36.
LazarusRS (1993) Coping theory and research: Past, present, and future. Psychosomatic Medicine55(3): 234–247.
37.
LiFKePHaoG (2018) The internal logical study of modern information technology and librarian’s quality improvement. Library and Information4: 97–104.
38.
LingWYangHFangL (2006) Perceived organizational support (POS) of the employees. Acta Psychologica Sinica2: 281–287.
39.
LiuJChenKLyuW (2024) Embracing artificial intelligence in the labour market: The case of statistics. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications11(1): 1112.
40.
McMillanRC (1997) Customer satisfaction and organizational support for service providers. PhD Thesis, University of Florida, US.
41.
MengJH (2007) On the occupational career design for librarian. Library Tribune38(2): 10–12.
42.
NakazibaSNgulubeP (2025) Continuing professional development strategies for digital transformation among academic librarians in Africa: A systematic review. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science57(1): 296–306.
43.
RiceDBBusbyAD (2023) How and when supervisors’ challenge appraisals impact employee bottom-line mentality? The roles of supervisor duty orientation and employee positive affectivity. Current Psychology42(18): 15248–15260.
44.
ScheuerMLBurtonJPBarberLK, et al. (2016) Linking abusive supervision to employee engagement and exhaustion. Organization Management Journal13: 138–147.
45.
SchmittJBSchneiderFMWeinmannC, et al. (2019) Saving tiger, orangutan & co: How subjective knowledge and text complexity influence online information seeking and behavior. Information Communication & Society22(9): 1193–1211.
46.
ShenJBensonJ (2016) When CSR is a social norm: How socially responsible human resource management affects employee work behavior. Journal of Management42(6): 1723–1746.
47.
SrivastavaSCChandraSShirishA (2015) Technostress creators and job outcomes: Theorising the moderating influence of personality traits. Information Systems Journal25(4): 355–401.
48.
SubaveerapandiyanASunanthiniCAmeesM (2023) A study on the knowledge and perception of artificial intelligence. IFLA Journal49(3): 503–513.
49.
TuYHaoPLongL (2023) Job replacement or job transformation? Definition, consequences, and sources of technology-driven job insecurity. Advances in Psychological Science31(8): 1359–1373.
50.
UNESCO (2022) K-12 AI Curricula: A Mapping of Government-Endorsed AI Curricula. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
51.
Van Den BroeckAElstTVBaillienE, et al. (2017) Job demands, job resources, burnout, work engagement, and their relationships: An analysis across sectors. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine59(4): 369–376.
52.
WangSW (2017) Artificial intelligence and library service reshaping. Library and Information (6): 6–18.
53.
WengQXiY (2010) The impact mechanism of career growth on turnover intention: The mediated role of career commitment and perceived opportunities. Nankai Business Review13(2): 119–131.
WuGGuoYHuangJ (2017) The effects of challenge and hindrance stressors on work engagement and job burnout: The mediating role of coping strategy. Studies of Psychology and Behavior15(6): 853–859.
56.
YangHLiaoJ (2009) A new viewpoint on knowledge-worker management: The job demand-resource model. Science of Science and Management of S.& T. 30(10): 171–176.
57.
YangMWenZChenY (2017) The moderating effect and the mediating effect of career competencies in the job demands-resources model. Journal of Psychological Science40(4): 822–829.
58.
YoonJAndrewsJEWardHL (2022) Perceptions on adopting artificial intelligence and related technologies in libraries: Public and academic librarians in North America. Library Hi Tech40(6): 1893–1915.
59.
YuanYYangMHouL (2024) Modernization-oriented practice and thinking on capacity building of university librarians: A case study of Fudan university library. Journal of University Libraries42(4): 27–34.
60.
ZengJ (2024) Developing an AI competency framework for librarians. Journal of Library and Information Science in Agriculture36(6): 102–103.
61.
ZhangWGaoX (2023) Research on the application status and development strategies of artificial intelligence in public libraries. Journal of the National Library of China32(5): 75–83.
62.
ZhangY (2006) Research on perceived job insecurity and its relationship with job engagement. MA Thesis, Zhejiang University, China.
63.
ZhaoXLiXChengC (2025) Cognition and practice: Research and analysis of the current status of AI technology application in university libraries. Journal of Information Management10(1): 6–19.
