How should instructors adapt technical editing courses to account for generative artificial intelligence (AI)? This article addresses what generative AI means for technical editing pedagogy. While AI tools may be able to address rote editing tasks, expert editors are still needed to provide accessible, ethical, and justice-oriented edits. After reviewing impacts of generative AI on editing praxis, the author focuses on the microcredentials that she built into an editing course in order to address these impacts pedagogically. The goal was to enable students to understand AI, argue for their expertise, and edit from ethical and social justice perspectives.
BenjaminS.SchreiberJ. (2021). Updating technical editing models for accessibility and advocacy. In Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication SIGDOC ‘21 (pp. 26–30). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472714.3473619
ClemS. (2023). Teaching technical editing for social justice. Technical Communication and Social Justice, 1(2), 49–69.
6.
ClemS.CheekR. (2022). Unjust revisions: A social justice framework for technical editing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 65(1), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC2021.3137666
EatonA. (2023). Editing. In YuH.BuehlJ. (Eds.), Keywords in technical and professional communication (pp. 105–109). WAC Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.37514/TPC-B.2023.1923.2.11
9.
Gain new skills, knowledge, and experience with microcredentials at SUNY. (n.d.). State University of New York. Retrieved September 14, 2023, from https://www.suny.edu/microcredentials/
10.
HaasA. M. (2023). SJ editing exercise for teaching TPE [Conference workshop]. Association for Teachers of Technical Writing 2023 Conference [Virtual].
JonesN. N.WaltonR. (2023). Social justice. In YuH.BuehlJ. (Eds.), Keywords in technical and professional communication (pp. 267–272). WAC Clearinghouse. https://doi.org/10.37514/TPC-B.2023.1923.2.11
15.
MalletteJ. C.GehrkeM. (2018). Theory to practice: Negotiating expertise for new technical communicators. Communication Design Quarterly, 6(3), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309578.3309586
MelançonL. (2019). A field-wide view of undergraduate and graduate editing courses in technical and professional communication. In AlbersM. J.FlanaganS. (Eds.), Editing in the modern classroom (pp. 171–191). Routledge.
SchriverK. (2012). What we know about expertise in professional communication. In BerningerV. W. (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 275–312). Psychology Press.
21.
TangY. (2021). A robot wrote this? An empirical study of AI's applications in writing practices. In Proceedings of the 39th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication SIGDOC ‘21 (pp. 380–381). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3472714.3475817
