We investigated the perception and recognition of errors in a population of practitioners and academics in professional and technical communication. Specifically, we measured 303 participants’ botheration levels of 24 usage errors and then correlated those results against their ability to recognize the errors. Results indicated that practitioners were often more bothered by errors than academics and that participants’ overall botheration level might have fluctuated over the past 40 years. Participants’ botheration level also appeared to associate with their ability to identify error. Finally, we found that participants’ gender, job type, and years working in the field influence their error perception.
AmareN.NowlinB.WeberJ. H.(2011).Technical editing in the 21st century.Boston, MA:Prentice Hall.
3.
BeasonL.(2001).Ethos and error: How business people react to errors.College Composition and Communication,53,33-64.
4.
BoettgerR. K.(2011).Examining error in the technical communication editing test. InProceedings of the Technical Communication Summit: STE’s 58th Annual Conference(pp.142-147).Fairfax, VA:Society for Technical Communication. Retrieved fromhttps://summit.stc.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/proceedings_2011-FINAL.pdf
5.
BoettgerR. K.(2012).Types of errors used in medical editing tests.American Medical Writers Association Journal,27,99-105.
6.
BoettgerR. K.(2014).The technical communication editing test: Three studies on this assessment type.Technical Communication,61,215-231.
7.
BoettgerR. K.LamC.(2013).An overview of experimental and quasi-experimental research in technical communication journals (1992-2011).IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication,56,272-293.
8.
BrandenburgL. C.(2015).Testing the recognition and perception of errors in context.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly,78,74-93.
9.
ConnorsR. J.LunsfordA. A.(1988).Frequency of formal errors in current college writing, or Ma and Pa Kettle do research.College Composition and Communication,39,395-409.
10.
FineganE.BiberD.(2001).Register variation and social dialect variation: The register axiom. InEckertP.RickfordJ. R.(Eds.),Style and sociolinguistic variation(pp.235-267).Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
11.
FriesC. C.(1940).American English grammar: The grammatical structure of present-day American English with especial reference to social differences or class dialects.New York, NY:Appleton-Century-Crofts.
12.
GilsdorfJ.LeonardD.(2001).Big stuff, little stuff: A decennial measurement of executives’ and academics’ reactions to questionable usage elements.Journal of Business Communication,38,439-471.
13.
GrayL. S.HeuserP.(2003).Nonacademic professionals’ perception of usage errors.Journal of Basic Writing,22,50-70.
14.
GurackL. J.HocksM. E.(2009).The technical communication handbook.New York, NY:Pearson Longman.
15.
HairstonM.(1981).Not all errors are created equal: Nonacademic readers in the professions respond to lapses in usage.College English,43,794-806.
16.
KantzM.YatesR.(1994).Whose judgments? A survey of faculty responses to common and highly irritating writing errors. InPartial proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Assembly for the Teaching of English Grammar(pp.38-54).Urbana, IL:National Council of Teachers of English. Retrieved fromhttp://eric.ed.gov/?q=ED397435&id=ED397435
17.
LamC.(2014,October).Visualizing categorical data: An introduction to correspondence analysis for technical communication researchers.Paper presented at the 2014 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference,Pittsburgh, PA.https://doi.org/10.1109/IPCC.2014.7020345
18.
LeonardD. J.GilsdorfJ. W.(1990).Language in change: Academics’ and executives’ perceptions of usage errors.Journal of Business Communication,27,137-158.
19.
LockerK.KienzlerD.(2012).Business and administrative communication(10th ed.).New York, NY:McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
20.
LunsfordA. A.LunsfordK. J.(2008).“Mistakes are a fact of life”: A national comparative study.College Composition and Communication,59,781-806.
21.
LunsfordA. A.MatsudaP. K.TardyC. M.(2010).The everyday writer with exercises with 2009 MLA and 2010 APA updates(4th ed.).Boston, MA:Bedford/St. Martin’s.
22.
MulacA.BradacJ. J.GibbonsP.(2001).Empirical support for the gender–as–culture hypothesis.Human Communication Research,27,121-152.
23.
NewmanM. L.GroomC. J.HandelmanL. D.PennebakerJ. W.(2008).Gender differences in language use: An analysis of 14,000 text samples.Discourse Processes,45,211-236.
24.
NoguchiR. R.(1991).Grammar and the teaching of writing: Limits and possibilities.Urbana, IL:National Council of Teachers of English.
25.
RewL. J.(1999).Editing for writers.Boston, MA:Prentice Hall.
SmithE. L.BernhardtS. A.(1997).Writing at work: Professional writing skills for people on the job.Lincolnwood, IL:NTC.
28.
WilliamsJ. M.(1981).The phenomenology of error.College Composition and Communication,32,152-168.
29.
WolfeJ.ShanmugarajN.SipeJ.(2016).Grammatical versus pragmatic error: Employer perceptions of nonnative and native English speakers.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly,79,397-415.
