Peer-Led Professional Development: How One Technical Communication Team Learns on the Job

Abstract

Technical communication practice can change rapidly over time and across organizations. As a result, lifelong learning is an important mind-set, yet few studies explore how technical communicators learn on the job. This study builds on research about technical communication training by reporting on learning practices in one documentation team working at a large, multinational corporate information technology firm. Based on interviews and artifact analysis, the authors report on topics, technologies, and learning purposes that the team discussed, finding that peer-led, collaborative learning enables documentation teams to create and sustain group dynamics, an underexplored facet of on-the-job learning.

Keywords

communication writing and technology empirical qualitative research situated learning peer learning

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

(2018). Survey reveals top tools, trends, and technologies in use in technical communication teams. Intercom, 65(8), 33–38. https://www.stc.org/intercom/2019/01/survey-reveals-top-tools-trends-and-technologies-in-use-in-technical-communication-teams/

Agboka

G. Y.

Dorpenyo

I. K.

(2022). Curricular efforts in technical communication after the social justice turn. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 36(1), 38–70. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10506519211044195

Carliner

(2012). The three approaches to professionalization in technical communication. Technical Communication, 59(1), 49–65. https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2012/03/05/the-three-approaches-to-professionalization-in-technical-communication/

Carliner

(2018). Professional development of technical communicators. Intercom, 65(8), 17–22. https://www.stc.org/intercom/2019/01/professional-development-of-technical-communicators/

Carliner

Chen

(2018). Who technical communicators are: A summary of demographics, backgrounds, and employment. Intercom, 65(8), 8–12.

Catanio

J. T.

Catanio

T. L.

(2010). The effects of integrating on-going training for technical documentation teams. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 40(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.40.1.e

Dubinsky

J. M.

Getchell

(2021). The disappearance of business communication from professional communication programs in English departments. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(4), 433–468. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10506519211021466

Friess

Boettger

R. K.

(2021). Identifying commonalities and divergences between technical communication scholarly and trade publications (1996–2017). Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(4), 407–432. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10506519211021468

Hart

Glick-Smith

J. L

Clark

(1994). Training in technical communication: Ideas for a partnership between the academy and workplace. Technical Communication, 41(3), 399–405. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43088466

10.

Kimball

(2015). Training and education: Technical communication managers speak out. Technical Communication, 62(2), 135–145. https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2015/07/14/training-and-education-technical-communication-managers-speak-out/

11.

Kohn

(2015). How professional writing pedagogy and university-workplace partnerships can shape the mentoring of workplace writing. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 45(2), 166–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281615569484

12.

Lippencott

Voss

(2001). Leveraging resources: How an STC chapter can support education in its community and professional development for its members. Technical Communication, 48(4), 449–464. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2001/00000048/00000004;jsessionid=5mc52ulsakgoj.x-ic-live-01

13.

Mallette

J. C.

Gehrke

(2018). Theory to practice: Negotiating expertise for new technical communicators. Communication Design Quarterly, 6(3), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1145/3309578.3309586

14.

Moore

L. E.

Earnshaw

(2020). How to better prepare technical communication students in an evolving field: Perspectives from academic program directors, practitioners, and recent graduates. Technical Communication, 67(1), 63–82. https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2020/03/05/how-to-better-prepare-technical-communication-students-in-an-evolving-field-perspectives-from-academic-program-directors-practitioners-and-recent-graduates/

15.

Pigg

Berger

(2020). Still “worlds apart?” Early-career writing learning as a cross-field opportunity. College English, 82(5), 507–514. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/still-worlds-apart-early-career-writing-learning/docview/2424656180/se-2

16.

Ranade

Swarts

(2019). Humanistic communication in information centric workplaces. Communication Design Quarterly, 7(4), 17–31. https://sigdoc.acm.org/cdq/humanistic-communication-in-information-centric-workplaces/https://doi.org/10.1145/3363790.3363792

17.

Smith

E. O.

(2000). Strength in the technical communication journals and diversity in the serials cited. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14(2), 131–184. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/105065190001400201

18.

Stanton

R. J.

(2017). Do technical/professional writing (TPW) programs offer what students need for their start in the workplace? A comparison of requirements in program curricula and job ads in industry. Technical Communication, 64(3), 223–236. https://www.stc.org/techcomm/2017/08/01/do-technicalprofessional-writing-tpw-programs-offer-what-students-need-for-their-start-in-the-workplace-a-comparison-of-requirements-in-program-curricula-and-job-ads-in-industry/

19.

Whiteside

(2003). The skills that technical communicators need: An investigation of technical communication graduates, managers, and curricula. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 33(4), 303–318. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.2190/3164-E4V0-BF7D-TDVA?icid=int.sj-abstract.similar-articles.1

20.

Wilson

Ford

J. D.

(2003). The big chill: Seven technical communicators talk ten years after their master’s program. Technical Communication, 50(2), 145–159. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/stc/tc/2003/00000050/00000002/art00003