Segmentation,Surveillance,and Automation: Practical and Ethical Considerations for Attracting,Sustaining,and Monetizing Audience Attention Online

Abstract

Through a case study of a popular food and recipe blog (Pinchofyum.com), this article details how two content creators practicing an advertising-based business model built a loyal audience and profitable business. A content analysis of the income reports published by the site's creators found that their advertising-based business model incentivized them to (a) segment their audience, (b) surveil their audience, and (c) automate interactions with their audience. This incentive structure led the content creators to employ an inconsistent and often problematic persona of their intended audience as they aimed to scale their ability to build trust with a rapidly growing audience. These findings provide guidance for aspiring online entrepreneurs and technical communicators desiring to understand the implications of distributing their content on platforms funded through advertising.

Keywords

attention economy audience surveillance content analysis entrepreneurship

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abidin

(2018, April). Layers of identity: How to be ‘real’ when everyone is watching. Real Life. https://reallifemag.com/layers-of-identity/.

Aristotle (2007). On Rhetoric: A theory of civic discourse (G. A. Kennedy, Trans.). Oxford University Press. (Original work published ca. 330 B.C.E.).

Bektas

(2021). Influencer marketing: Collaborations between sport supplement brands and social influencers. University of Twente Student Theses. http://essay.utwente.nl/86760/.

boyd

(2006). A blogger’s blog: Exploring the definition of a medium. Reconstruction, 6(4). http://reconstruction.eserver.org/064/boyd/shtml.

Brave Software (2021). Basic attention token (BAT): Blockchain based digital advertising . https://basicattentiontoken.org/static-assets/documents/BasicAttentionTokenWhitePaper-4.pdf.

Breuch

(2018). Involving the audience: A rhetorical perspective on using social media to improve websites. Routledge.

Burke

(1969). A rhetoric of motives, (2nd ed.). University of California Press.

Cadle

(2014). Why I still blog. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 19(1), np. https://praxis.technorhetoric.net/tiki-index.php?page = PraxisWiki%3A_%3AWhy + I + Still + Blog.

Campbell

K. S.

Naidoo

J. S.

(2017). Rhetorical move structure in high-tech marketing white papers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(1), 94–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651916667532

10.

Campbell

K. S.

Naidoo

J. S.

Campbell

S. M.

(2020). Hard or soft sell?” understanding white papers as content marketing. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2019.2961000

11.

Center for Humane Technology (2018). Our society is being hijacked by technology. http://humanetech.com/problem/.

12.

Doctorow

(2020). How to destroy surveillance capitalism: OneZero . https://onezero.medium.com/how-to-destroy-surveillance-capitalism-8135e6744d59.

13.

Duffy

Hund

(2015). “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social Media + Society, 1(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051156043

14.

Foss

Griffin

(1995). Beyond persuasion: A proposal for an invitational rhetoric. Communication Monographs, 62(1), 2–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759509376345

15.

Gallagher

(2018). Considering the comments: Theorizing online audiences as emergent processes. Computers and Composition, 48(1), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2018.03.002

16.

Gearhart

(1979). The womanization of rhetoric. Women’s Studies International Quarterly, 2(2), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-0685(79)91809-8

17.

Harris

(2019). New agenda for tech. https://vimeo.com/332532972.

18.

Herring

S. C.

Sheidt

L. A.

Bouns

Wright

(2004). Bridging the gap: A genre analysis of weblogs. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Science (pp. 1011). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

19.

Hollebeek

Macky

(2019). Digital content marketing’s role in fostering consumer engagement, trust, and value: Framework, fundamental propositions, and implications. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 45(1), 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2018.07.003

20.

Hughes

Swaminathan

Brooks

(2019). Driving brand engagement through online social influencers: An empirical investigation of sponsored blogging campaigns. Journal of Marketing, 83(5), 78–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919854374

21.

Hunter

(2016). Monetizing the mommy: Mommy blogs and the audience commodity. Information, Communication & Society, 19(9), 1306–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1187642

22.

Jackson

Wallin

(2009). Rediscovering the “back and forthness” of rhetoric in the age of YouTube. College Composition and Communication, 61(2), 374–396.

23.

Johnson

R. R.

(1997). Audience involved: Toward a participatory model of writing. Computers and Composition, 14(3), 361–376. https://doi.org:10.1016/S8755-4615(97)90006-2

24.

Kimme Hea

(2014). Social media in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2014.850841

25.

Krippendorff

(2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.). Sage.

26.

Lange

(2010). Achieving creative integrity on YouTube: Reciprocities and tensions. Enculturation, 8(1). http://enculturation.net/achieving-creative-integrity

27.

Lauren

Pigg

(2016). Networking in a field of introverts: The egonets, networking practices, and networking technologies of technical communication entrepreneurs. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 59(4), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2614744

28.

Lehto

(2021). Ambivalent influencers: Feeling rules and the affective practice of anxiety in social media influencer work. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 25(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549421988958

29.

Lou

Yuan

(2019). Influencer marketing: How message value and credibility affect consumer trust of branded content on social media. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 19(1), 58–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2018.1533501

30.

Malone

E. M.

Wright

(2018). “To promote that demand”: Toward a history of the marketing white paper as a genre. Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 32(1), 113–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917729861

31.

Marwick

(2013). “They’re really profound women, they’re entrepreneurs”: Conceptions of authenticity in fashion blogging [Paper presentation]. International conference on weblogs and social media, Cambridge, MA.

32.

Miller

(1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335638409383686

33.

Nardi

B. A.

Schian

D. J.

Gumbrecht

Swartz

(2004). Why we blog. Communication ACM, 47(12), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1035134.1035163

34.

Ostrom

(2011, September 5). The food blog money making experiment—August—$21.97. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/the-food-blog-money-making-experiment-month-1.

35.

Ostrom

(2011, October 5). The food blog money making experiment—September—$72.59. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/the-food-blog-money-making-experiment-month.

36.

Ostrom

(2011, December 9). November income report $220.49. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/the-food-blog-money-making-experiment-november.

37.

Ostrom

(2012, April 6). March income report—$1,024.53. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/march-income-report-making-money-from-a-food-blog-experiment.

38.

Ostrom

(2012, May 7). April income report—$2,322.30. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/april-income-report-making-money-from-a-food-blog.

39.

Ostrom

(2012, June 25). May income report—$2,969.96. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/may-income-report-making-money-from-a-food-blog.

40.

Ostrom

(2012, November 7). October income report—$4,237.45. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/making-money-from-a-food-blog-october-2012.

41.

Ostrom

(2013, March 15). February income report—$6,975.30. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/making-money-from-a-food-blog-february-2013.

42.

Ostrom

(2013, April 12). March income report—$6,914.71. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/making-money-from-a-food-blog-march-2013.

43.

Ostrom

(2013, May 10). April traffic and income report—$3,291.46. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/making-money-from-a-food-blog-april-2013.

44.

Ostrom

(2013, June 14). May traffic and income report—$7,093.52. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/making-money-from-a-food-blog-may-2013.

45.

Ostrom

(2013, July 12). June traffic and income report—$8,673.27. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/making-money-from-a-food-blog-june-2013.

46.

Ostrom

(2013, November 9). October traffic and income report—$15,048.82. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/october-traffic-and-income-report.

47.

Ostrom

(2014, January 14). December traffic and income report—$16,573.88. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/december-traffic-and-income-report.

48.

Ostrom

(2014, February 7). January traffic and income report—$17,734.97. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/january-traffic-income-report.

49.

Ostrom

(2014, July 12). June traffic and income report—$31,073.42. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/june-income-report.

50.

Ostrom

(2014, August 9). July traffic and income report—$26,385.75. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/july-income-report.

51.

Ostrom

(2014, September 14). August traffic and income report—$32,647.69. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/august-income-report.

52.

Ostrom

(2014, November 9). October traffic and income report—$18,734.27. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/october-traffic-and-income-report-2014.

53.

Ostrom

Dink

(2016, September 12). Traffic and income report—July 2016. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/traffic-and-income-july.

54.

Ostrom

(2015, April 11). March traffic and income report: Celebrating 5 years of pinch of yum. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/march-traffic-and-income-5-years.

55.

Ostrom

(2015, June 19). Traffic and Income report—May 2015. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/may-income-report.

56.

Ostrom

(2015, November 18). Traffic and income report—October 2015. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/traffic-and-income-report-october-2015.

57.

Ostrom

(2015, December 19). Traffic and income report—November 2015. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/traffic-and-income-report-november.

58.

Ostrom

(2016, March 20). Traffic and income report—February 2016. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/traffic-and-income-report-february.

59.

Ostrom

(2016, May 7). Traffic and income report—March 2016. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/traffic-income-report-march-2016.

60.

Ostrom

(2017, June 7). Income reports: What we learned and why we’re stopping. Pinch of Yum. https://pinchofyum.com/what-we-learned-why-were-stopping.

61.

Perelman

Olbrechts-Tyteca

(1969). The new rhetoric: A treatise on argumentation. University of Notre Dame Press.

62.

Pigg

(2014). Coordinating constant invention: Social media’s role in distributed work. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(2), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.796545

63.

Plato (1998). Gorgias (J. H. Nichols, Jr., Trans.). Cornell University Press. (Original work published 380 B.C.E.)

64.

Potts

(2014). Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation. Routledge.

65.

Qian

Park

J. S.

(2021). Influencer-brand fit and brand dilution in China’s luxury market: The moderating role of self-concept clarity. Journal of Brand Management, 28(1), 199–220. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00226-2

66.

Ratcliffe

(2005). Rhetorical listening: Identification, gender, whiteness. Southern Illinois University Press.

67.

Russo

(2020). The infinite machine: How an army of crypto-hackers is building the next internet with ethereum. HarperCollins.

68.

Saldaña

(2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

69.

Schouten

Janssen

Verspaget

(2019). Celebrity vs. influencer endorsements in advertising: The role of identification, credibility, and product-endorser fit. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2019.1634898

70.

Smythe

(1981). On the audience commodity and its work. In Dependency road: Communications, capitalism, consciousness, and Canada (pp. 22–51). Ablex.

71.

Spartz

Weber

(2015). Writing entrepreneurs: A survey of attitudes, habits, skills, and genres. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 29(4), 428–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651915588145

72.

Spinuzzi

(2016). Introduction to the special issue on entrepreneurship communication. IEEE Transactions in Professional Communication, 59(4), 316–322. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2016.2607803

73.

Spinuzzi

(2017). Introduction to special issue on the rhetoric of entrepreneurship: Theories, methodologies, and practices. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 31(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651917695537

74.

Stake

(1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

75.

Tunpornchai

Thamma

Sirikajohndechsakun

(2021). Micro influencer strategy in the men’s cosmetics industry on Thailand’s Facebook. Asian Administration and Management Review, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3932501

76.

Woods

(2016). #Sponsored: Emergence of influencer marketing [Honors thesis, University of Tennessee]. http://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article¼3010&context¼utk_chanhonoproj.

77.

(2017). The attention merchants: The epic scramble to get inside our heads. Atlantic Books.

78.

Yin

(2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed). Sage.

79.

Zuboff

(2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/jit.2015.5

80.

Zuboff

(2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs.