Risk communication is traditionally authored by institutions and addressed to the potentially affected publics for whom they are responsible. This study expands the scope of risk communication by analyzing safety guides produced by a hypermarginalized group for whom institutions show no responsibility: full-contact, street-level sex workers. Using corpus-assisted discourse analysis and keyword analysis to reveal patterns of word choices, the authors argue that the safety guides exhibit characteristics and qualities of professional communication: audience adaptation, social responsibility, and ethical awareness. This area of inquiry—the DIY, peer-to-peer, extrainstitutional risk communication produced by marginalized people—widens technical and professional communication's approach to risk communication.
AcharyaK. R. (2019). Usability for social justice: Exploring the implementation of localization usability in global north technology in the context of a global south’s country. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 49(1), 6–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281617735842
2.
ÄdelA. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of political discourse. In McCarthyM.O’KeeffeA. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 591–604). Taylor & Francis Group.
3.
AgbokaG. (2013). Participatory localization: A social justice approach to navigating unenfranchised/disenfranchised cultural sites. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 28–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.730966
4.
AgbokaG. Y. (2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297–327. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.3.e
5.
AnthonyL. (2006). Developing a freeware, multiplatform corpus analysis toolkit for the technical writing classroom. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 49(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2006.880753
BakerP. (2012). Acceptable bias? Using corpus linguistics methods with critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies, 9(3), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.688297
8.
BerlinJ. (2003). Rhetoric and ideology in the writing class. In VillaneuvaV.Jr. (Ed.), Cross-talk in comp theory: A reader. Revised and updated (pp. 679–699). National Council of Teachers of English.
9.
BirdS.DaleR.DorrB. J.GibsonB.JosephM. T.KanM. Y.LeeD.PowleyB.RadevD. R.TanY. F. (2008). The ACL Anthology reference corpus: A reference dataset for bibliographic research in computational linguistics. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008 (pp. 1755–1759).
10.
BoettgerR. K.LamC. (2013). An overview of experimental and quasi-experimental research in technical communication journals (1992–2011). IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 56(4), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2013.2287570
11.
BoettgerR. K.WulffS. (2014). The naked truth about the naked this: Investigating grammatical prescriptivism in technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 23(2), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2013.803919
12.
BoiarskyC. R. (2016). Risk communication and miscommunication: Case studies in science, technology, engineering, government, and community organizations. University Press of Colorado.
CarradiniS. (2018). An organizational structure of indie rock musicians as displayed by facebook usage. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 48(2), 151–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616667677
15.
CarverR. P. (1989). Silent reading rates in grade equivalents. Journal of Reading Behavior, 21(2), 155–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968909547667
16.
CheekR. (2020). Zombie ent(r)ailments in risk communication: A rhetorical analysis of the CDC’s Zombie apocalypse preparedness campaign. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 50(4), 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281619892630
17.
CibanguS. K. (2009). Oral communication and technical writing: A reconsideration of writing in a multicultural era. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 39(1), 79–105. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.39.1.f
18.
CohanD.LutnickA.DavidsonP.ClonigerC.HerlynA.BreyerJ.CoboughC.WilsonD.KlausnerJ. (2006). Sex worker health: San Francisco style. Sexually Transmitted Infections, 82(5), 418–422. https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2006.020628
19.
ColtonJ. S.HolmesS.WalwemaJ. (2017). From noobguides to #OpKKK: Ethics of anonymous’ tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1257743
20.
ConnersE.SilvermanJ. G.UlibarriM.Magis-RodriguezC.StrathdeeS. A.Staines-OrozcoH.PattersonT. L.BrouwerK. C. (2016). Structural determinants of client perpetrated violence among female sex workers in two Mexico–US border cities. AIDS and Behavior, 20(1), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1111-1
21.
CoombsW. T. (2012). Crisis communication and its allied fields. In CoombsW. T.HolladayS. J. (Eds.), The handbook of crisis communication (pp. 54–64). Wiley-Blackwell.
22.
CoxM. B. (2019). Working closets: Mapping queer professional discourses and why professional communication studies need queer rhetorics. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 33(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651918798691
23.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
DingH. (2009). Rhetorics of alternative media in an emerging epidemic: SARS, censorship, and extra-institutional risk communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(4), 327–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572250903149548
26.
DingH.KongY. (2019). Constructing artificial intelligence in the U.S. and China: A cross-cultural, corpus-assisted study. China Media Research, 15(1), 93–105.
27.
EdenfieldA. C. (2019). Queering consent: Justice in sexual consent messaging design. Communication Design Quarterly, 7(2), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/3358931.3358938
EviaC.PatriarcaA. (2012). Beyond compliance: Participatory translation of safety communication for Latino construction workers. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 340–367. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439697
31.
FaberB. (2002). Professional identities: What is professional about professional communication?Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 16(3), 306–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/105065190201600303
32.
FleissJ. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031619
33.
FrostE. A. (2018). Apparent feminism and risk communication. In HaasA.EbleM. (Eds.), Key theoretical frameworks: Teaching technical communication in the twenty-first century (pp. 23–45). University Press of Colorado.
34.
GallG. (2007). Sex worker unionisation: An exploratory study of emerging collective organisation. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2338.2007.00436.x
35.
Garrison-JoynerV. (2019). Strict definitions of professionalism reify eurocentric priorities. [Paper presentation]. In Council for programs in technical and scientific communication, West Chester, PA.
36.
GrabillJ. T.SimmonsW. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259809364640
37.
HaasA. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651912439539
38.
HaasA. M.FrostE. A. (2017). Toward an apparent decolonial feminist rhetoric of risk. In RossD. G. (Ed.), Topic-driven environmental rhetoric (pp. 168–186). Routledge.
39.
HolladayD. (2017). Classified conversations: Psychiatry and tactical technical communication in online spaces. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2012.702533
40.
HorningA. (2019). Quitting the sex trade: Keeping narratives inside the debates on prostitution policy and legislation. Victims and Offenders, 14(5), 533–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2019.1628149
JonesN. N. (2016). The technical communicator as advocate: Integrating a social justice approach in technical communication. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 46(3), 342–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047281616639472
43.
JonesN. N.MooreK. R.WaltonR. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1224655
44.
JonesN. N.WilliamsM. F. (2018). Technologies of disenfranchisement: Literacy tests and black voters in the US from 1890 to 1965. Technical Communication, 65(4), 371–386.
45.
KimballM. A. (2006). Cars, culture, and tactical technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1501_6
46.
KontulaA. (2008). The sex worker and her pleasure. Current Sociology, 56(4), 605–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392108090944
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
50.
MooreK. R.JonesN.CundiffB. S.HeiligL. (2018). Contested sites of health risks: Using wearable technologies to intervene in racial oppression. Communication Design Quarterly, 5(4), 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/3188387.3188392
OngW. J. (1986). Writing is a technology that restructures thought. In BaumannG. (Ed.), The written word: Literacy in transition: Wolfson college lectures 1985 (pp. 23–50). Oxford University Press.
53.
OpriskoR.CaplanJ. (2014). Beyond the cake model: Critical intersectionality and the relative advantage of disadvantage. Epiphany, 7(2), 35–54.
54.
PetersenE. J. (2014). Redefining the workplace: The professionalization of motherhood through blogging. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 277–296. https://doi.org/10.2190/TW.44.3.d
SandersT. (2007). Becoming an ex–sex worker: Making transitions out of a deviant career. Feminist Criminology, 2(1), 74–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1557085106294845
58.
Sarat-St. PeterH. A. (2017). “Make a bomb in the kitchen of your mom”: Jihadist tactical technical communication and the everyday practice of cooking. Technical Communication Quarterly, 26(1), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2016.1275862
59.
SauerB. (1996). Communicating risk in a cross-cultural context: A cross-cultural comparison of rhetorical and social understandings in U.S. and British mine safety training programs. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10(3), 306–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651996010003002
ScottJ. B. (2003). Risky rhetoric: AIDS and the cultural practices of HIV testing. Southern Illinois University Press.
62.
ScottJ. B. (2006). Kairos as indeterminate risk management: The pharmaceutical industry's response to bioterrorism. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(2), 115–143. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335630600816938
63.
SellnowT. L.SeegerM. W. (2013). Theorizing crisis communication. Wiley-Blackwell.
ShannonK.CseteJ. (2010). Violence, condom negotiation, and HIV/STI risk among sex workers. JAMA, 304(5), 573–574.
66.
ShannonK.KerrT.StrathdeeS. A.ShovellerJ.MontanerJ. S.TyndallM. W. (2009). Prevalence and structural correlates of gender based violence among a prospective cohort of female sex workers. BMJ, 339, b2939. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2939
67.
SharmaD.ShuklaR.GiriA. K.KumarS. (2019). A brief review on search engine optimization. In 2019 9th international conference on cloud computing, data science & engineering (confluence) (pp. 687–692). Noida, India.
68.
SheltonC. (2019). Shifting out of neutral: Centering difference, bias, and social justice in a business writing course. Technical Communication Quarterly, 29(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1640287
69.
SimicM.JohnstonL. G.PlattL.BarosS.AndjelkovicV.NovotnyT.RhodesT. (2006). Exploring barriers to ‘respondent driven sampling’ in sex worker and drug-injecting sex worker populations in Eastern Europe. Journal of Urban Health, 83(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9098-6
70.
StataCorp (2019). Stata statistical software: Release 16 [computer software]. StataCorp.
StrohmayerA.ClamenJ.LaingM. (2019). Technologies for social justice: Lessons from sex workers on the front lines. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (p. 652). ACM.
75.
SunH. (2006). The triumph of users: Achieving cultural usability goals with user localization. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15(4), 457–481. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15427625tcq1504_3
ThompsonI. (1999). Women and feminism in technical communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13(2), 154–178. https://doi.org/10.2190/4JUC-8RAC-73H6-N57U
UlmerR. R.SellnowT. L.SeegerM. W. (2015). Effective crisis communication: Moving from crisis to opportunity. Sage.
81.
WaltonR.ColtonJ. S.Wheatley-BoxxR. K.GurkoK. (2017). Social justice across the curriculum: Research-based course design. Programmatic Perspectives, 8(2), 119.
82.
WaltonR.JonesN. N. (2013). Navigating increasingly cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary, and cross-organizational contexts to support social justice. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 1(4), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/2524248.2524257
83.
WaltonR.ZralyM.MugenganaJ. P. (2015). Values and validity: Navigating messiness in a community-based research project in Rwanda. Technical Communication Quarterly, 24(1), 45–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2015.975962
84.
WilliamsM. F. (2010). From black codes to recodification: Removing the veil from regulatory writing. Baywood.
85.
WilliamsM. F. (2012). A survey of emerging research: Debunking the fallacy of colorblind technical communication. Programmatic Perspectives, 5(1), 86–93.
86.
WynterS. (1992). “No humans involved”: An open letter to my colleagues. Voices of the African Diaspora, 8, 1–17.
