This article explores science communication in the context of COVID-19 through a case study of a January 31, 2020, bioRxiv preprint publication that led to conspiracy theories by suggesting that SARS-CoV-2 originated in the laboratory through genetic engineering. Analysis will consider the initial preprint, the scientific critique that led it to be withdrawn, the conspiracy theories that continue to circulate, and the larger debate that this example has sparked among advocates and critics of open science.
CalisherC.CarrollD.ColwellR.CorleyR. B.DaszakP.DrostenC.EnjuanesL.FarrarJ.FieldH.GoldingJ.GorbalenyaA.HaagmansB.HughesJ. M.KareshW. B.KeuschG. T.LamS. K.LubrothJ.MackenzieJ. S.MadoffL.TurnerM. (2020). Statement in support of the scientists, public health professionals, and medical professionals of China combatting COVID-19. The Lancet, 395(10226), e42–e43.
2.
CeccarelliL. (2001). Shaping science with rhetoric: The cases of Dobzhansky, Schrodinger, and Wilson. University of Chicago Press.
HaoP.ZhongW.SongS.FanS.LiX. (2020). Is SARS-CoV-2 originated from a laboratory? A rebuttal to the claim of formation via laboratory recombination. Emerging Microbes and Infections, 9(1), 545–547.
MillerC. R. (1992). Kairos in the rhetoric of science. In. KinneavyJ. L.WitteS. P.NakadateN.CherryR. D.. (Eds.). A rhetoric of doing: Essays on written discourse in honor of James L. Kinneavy (pp. 310–327). Southern Illinois University Press.
YaoX.YeF.ZhangM.CuiC.HuangB.NiuP.LiuX.ZhaoL.DongE.SongC.ZhanS.LuR.LiH.TanW.LiuD. (2020). In vitro antiviral activity and projection of optimized dosing design of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa237
