This article addresses how social media platforms can better highlight expert voices through design choices. Misinformation, after all, has exploded during the Covid-19 pandemic, and platforms have struggled to address the issue. The authors examine this critical gap in validation mechanisms in the current social media platforms and suggest possible solutions for this urgent problem with third-party partnerships.
GillespieT. (2018). Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
GrabillJ. T.SimmonsW. M. (1998). Toward a critical rhetoric of risk communication: Producing citizens and the role of technical communicators. Technical Communication Quarterly, 7(4), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572259809364640
8.
PhillipsW. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
9.
PottsL. (2014). Social media in disaster response: How experience architects can build for participation. Routledge.
10.
ReagleJ. M. (2015). Reading the comments: Likers, haters, and manipulators at the bottom of the Web. MIT Press.
11.
RidolfoJ.Hart-DavidsonW. (Eds.). (2019). Rhet ops: Rhetoric and information warfare. University of Pittsburgh Press.
12.
TriceM.PottsL. (2018). Building dark patterns into platforms: How gamergate perturbed Twitter’s user experience. Present Tense6(3), 1–10.
