Is Bad News Difficult to Read? A Readability Analysis of Differently Connoted Passages in the Annual Reports of the 30 DAX Companies

Abstract

This study examines the strategic use of readability to obfuscate negative news in a German financial communication context. Combining a manual and an automated content analysis, the authors assess the tone and readability of three parts (chairman’s address, share-price development, and development in the fiscal year) of the 2014 annual reports of the 30 companies listed in the German stock index DAX. The results indicate that positively connoted passages in annual reports are not necessarily easier to read than negatively connoted passages. Furthermore, the readability of the annual report varies depending on the part and its function within the report.

Keywords

readability obfuscation annual reports content analysis linear mixed-effects analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adelberg

A. H.

(1979). Narrative disclosures contained in financial reports: Means of communication or manipulation? Accounting and Business Research, 9, 179–190.

Alter

A. L.

Oppenheimer

D. M.

(2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13, 219–235.

Anderson

. (1981, August). Analysing the readability of English and non-English texts in the classroom with LIX. Paper presented at the Seventh Australian Reading Association Conference, Darwin, Australia. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED207022

Ballstaedt

S.-P.

Mandl

(1988). The assessment of comprehensibility. In Ammon

Dittmar

Mattheier

K. J.

(Eds.), Sociolinguistics: An international handbook of the science of language and society (Vol. 2, pp. 1039–1052). De Gruyter.

Bamberger

Vanecek

(1984). Lesen–Verstehen–Lernen–Schreiben: Die Schwierigkeitsstufen von Texten in deutscher Sprache [Reading–understanding–learning–writing: The levels of difficulty of German texts]. Jugend und Volk.

Bates

Mächler

Bolker

Walker

(2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.

Bayerlein

Davidson

(2012). The influence of connotation on readability and obfuscation in Australian chairman addresses. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27, 175–198.

Bayerlein

Davidson

(2015). Are user perceptions of chairman addresses managed through syntactical complexity and rationalisation? Australian Accounting Review, 25, 192–203.

Best

K.-H.

(2006). Sind Wort- und Satzlaünge brauchbare Kriterien zur Bestimmung der Lesbarkeit von Texten [Are word and sentence length useful criteria for determining the readability of texts]? In Wichter

Busch

(Eds.), Wissenstransfer–Erfolgskontrolle und Ruückmeldungen aus der Praxis [Knowledge transfer–control of success and feedback from practice] (pp. 21–31). Peter Lang.

10.

Bischof

Senninger

(2018). Simple politics for the people? Complexity in campaign messages and political knowledge. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 473–495.

11.

Björnsson

C. H.

(1968). Lesbarkeit durch Lix [Readability by LIX]. Pedagogiskt Centrum.

12.

Bloomfield

R. J.

(2002). The “incomplete revelation hypothesis” and financial reporting. Accounting Horizons, 16, 233–243.

13.

Boettger

R. K.

Palmer

(2010). Quantitative content analysis: Its use in technical communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 53, 346–357.

14.

Böttger

(2003). Entwicklungen in der Finanzkommunikation am Beispiel des Aktionärsbriefs [Developments in financial communication using the example of the letter to shareholders]. In Nielsen

(Ed.), Wirtschaftskommunikation im Wandel: Dynamik, Entwicklung und Prozessualität [Business communication in transition: dynamics, development and processuality] (pp. 11–30). Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag.

15.

Camerer

Loewenstein

Weber

(1989). The curse of knowledge in economic settings: An experimental analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1232–1254.

16.

Chaiken

Liberman

Eagly

A. H.

(1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Uleman

J. S.

Bargh

J. A.

(Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guilford Press.

17.

Clarke

D. P.

Hrasky

S. L.

Tan

C. G. T.

(2009). Voluntary narrative disclosures by local governments: A comparative analysis of the textual complexity of mayoral and chairpersons’ letters in annual reports. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 68, 194–207.

18.

Clatworthy

Jones

M. J.

(2001). The effect of thematic structure on the variability of annual report readability. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 14, 311–326.

19.

Clyne

(1987). Cultural differences in the organization of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211–247.

20.

Courtis

J. K.

(1982). Private shareholder response to corporate annual reports. Accounting & Finance, 22, 53–72.

21.

Courtis

J. K.

(1995). Readability of annual reports: Western versus Asian evidence. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 8, 4–17.

22.

Courtis

J. K.

(1998). Annual report readability variability: Tests of the obfuscation hypothesis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 11, 459–472.

23.

Courtis

J. K.

(2004). Corporate report obfuscation: Artefact or phenomenon? British Accounting Review, 36, 291–312.

24.

Courtis

J. K.

Hassan

(2002). Reading ease of bilingual annual reports. Journal of Business Communication, 39, 394–413.

25.

David

(2001). Mythmaking in annual reports. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 195–222.

26.

Davis

(2006). The role of the mass media in investor relations. Journal of Communication Management, 10, 7–17.

27.

Ditlevsen

M. G.

(2012). Telling the story of Danisco’s annual reports (1935 through 2007–2008) from a communicative perspective. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 92–115.

28.

Fombrun

Shanley

(1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258.

29.

Fry

(1990). A readability formula for short passages. Journal of Reading, 33, 594–597.

30.

Günther

Otterbein

(1996). Die Gestaltung der Investor Relations am Beispiel führender deutscher Aktiengesellschaften [The design of investor relations using the example of leading German stock corporations]. Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft, 66, 389–417.

31.

Hayes

A. F.

(2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385–410.

32.

Hayes

A. F.

Krippendorff

(2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.

33.

Henry

(2008). Are investors influenced by how earnings press releases are written? Journal of Business Communication, 45, 363–407.

34.

Hinds

P. J.

(1999). The curse of expertise: The effects of expertise and debiasing methods on prediction of novice performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 5, 205–221.

35.

Hörmann

Scherr

(2012). Investor Relations und Corporate Governance: Eine kapitalmarktorientierte Analyse unter Berücksichtigung medialer Wirkungszusammenhänge [Investor relations and corporate governance: A capital market-oriented analysis, taking into account medial interdependencies]. In Kolo

Döbler

Rademacher

(Eds.), Wertschöpfung durch Medien im Wandel [Value creation through media in transition] (pp. 303–320). Nomos.

36.

Hrasky

S. U. E.

Mason

Wills

(2009). The textual complexity of annual report narratives: A comparison of high- and low-performance companies. New Zealand Journal of Applied Business Research, 7, 31–45.

37.

Hutt

(2012). The extent and patterns of multi-stakeholder communications in annual report letters. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 17, 323–335.

38.

Hütten

(2000). Der Geschäftsbericht als Informationsinstrument: Rechtsgrundlagen–Funktionen–Optimierungsmöglichkeiten [The annual report as an information tool: Legal basis–functions–optimization options]. Hagemann.

39.

Jones

M. J.

Shoemaker

P. A.

(1994). Accounting narratives: A review of empirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, 13, 142–184.

40.

Karreman

de Jong

Hofmans

(2014). The effects of different parts of the annual report on potential investors’ attitudes towards the company and on the corporate reputation. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 57, 78–97.

41.

Kercher

(2010). Zur Messung der Verständlichkeit deutscher Spitzenpolitiker anhand quantitativer Textmerkmale [The measure of comprehensibility of top-ranking German politicians through quantitative text features]. In Faas

Arzheimer

Roßteutscher

(Eds.), Information–Wahrnehmung–Emotion [Information–perception–emotion] (pp. 97–121). Springer VS.

42.

Kercher

(2013). Verstehen und Verständlichkeit von Politikersprache: Verbale Bedeutungsvermittlung zwischen Politikern und Bürgern [Comprehension and comprehensibility of political language: Verbal mediation of meaning between politicians and citizens]. Springer VS.

43.

Kintsch

van Dijk

T. A.

(1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394.

44.

Klare

G. R.

(1971). Some empirical predictors of readability. In Rothkopf

E. Z.

Johnson

P. E.

(Eds.), Verbal learning research and the technology of written instruction (pp. 241–254). Teachers College Press.

45.

Kleinnijenhuis

Schultz

Utz

Oegema

(2015). The mediating role of the news in the BP oil spill crisis 2010: How U.S. news is influenced by public relations and in turn influences public awareness, foreign news, and the share price. Communication Research, 42, 408–428.

46.

Kuznetsova

Brockhoff

P. B.

Christensen

R. H. B

. (2016). lmertest: Tests in linear mixed effects models (Version 2.0-33). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest

47.

Laksmana

Tietz

Yang

Y.-W.

(2012). Compensation discussion and analysis (CD&A): Readability and management obfuscation. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 31, 185–203.

48.

Limaye

M. R.

(2001). Some reflections on explanation in negative messages. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 100–110.

49.

Lischka

J. A.

Siegert

(2013). Beeinflussen Wirtschaftsnachrichten auch Wirtschaftserwartungen von Experten? Die Prognosequalität von öffentlich-rechtlichen und Service public Wirtschaftsnachrichten für Erwartungen von Wirtschaftsexperten in Deutschland und in der Schweiz [Does business news also influence economic expectations of experts? The prediction quality of public service and service public business news for expectations of economic experts in Germany and Switzerland]. Studies in Communication Sciences, 13, 174–184.

50.

Locker

K. O.

(1999). Factors in reader responses to negative letters. Experimental evidence for changing what we teach. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, 5–48.

51.

Loughran

McDonald

(2011). When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. Journal of Finance, 66, 35–65.

52.

Mast

(2013). Unternehmenskommunikation: Ein Leitfaden [Corporate communication: A guide] (5th rev. ed.). UVK.

53.

Mast

H.-J.

(2009). Creditor Relations als Erfolgsfaktor für die Fremdkapitalfinanzierung [Creditor relations as a success factor for debt financing]. In Kirchhoff

K. R.

Piwinger

(Eds.), Praxishandbuch Investor Relations: Das Standardwerk der Finanzkommunikation [A practical guide to investor relations: The standard work of financial communication] (2nd rev. ed., pp. 475–490). Gabler.

54.

Men

L. R.

(2012). CEO credibility, perceived organizational reputation, and employee engagement. Public Relations Review, 38, 171–173.

55.

Merkl-Davies

D. M.

Brennan

N. M.

(2007). Discretionary disclosure strategies in corporate narratives: Incremental information or impression management? Journal of Accounting Literature, 26, 116–196.

56.

Merkl-Davies

D. M.

Brennan

N. M.

(2011). A conceptual framework of impression management: New insights from psychology, sociology and critical perspectives. Accounting and Business Research, 41, 415–437.

57.

Michalke

. (2017). koRpus: An R package for text analysis (Version 0.10-20). Retrieved from https://reaktanz.de/?c=hacking&s=koRpus

58.

Miller

B. P.

(2010). The effects of reporting complexity on small and large investor trading. Accounting Review, 85, 2107–2143.

59.

Moreno

Casasola

(2016). A readability evolution of narratives in annual reports: A longitudinal study of two Spanish companies. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30, 202–235.

60.

Piwinger

(2009a). IR als Kommunikationsdisziplin [Investor relations as a communication discipline]. In Kirchhoff

K. R.

Piwinger

(Eds.), Praxishandbuch Investor Relations: Das Standardwerk der Finanzkommunikation [A practical guide to investor relations: The standard work of financial communication] (pp. 13–33). Gabler.

61.

Piwinger

(2009b). Protokoll und Präsentation: Geschäftsberichte als Mittel der Information und Beziehungspflege [Protocol and presentation: Annual reports as a means of information and relationship management]. In Kirchhoff

K. R.

Piwinger

(Eds.), Praxishandbuch Investor Relations: Das Standardwerk der Finanzkommunikation [A practical guide to investor relations: The standard work of financial communication] (pp. 357–367). Gabler.

62.

R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (R Version 3.3.3) [Software]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/

63.

Redish

(2000). Readability formulas have even more limitations than Klare discusses. ACM Journal of Computer Documentation, 24, 132–137.

64.

Rennekamp

(2012). Processing fluency and investors’ reactions to disclosure readability. Journal of Accounting Research, 50, 1319–1354.

65.

Rutherford

B. A.

(2003). Obfuscation, textual complexity and the role of regulated narrative accounting disclosure in corporate governance. Journal of Management and Governance, 7, 187–210.

66.

Schafraad

van Zoonen

Verhoeven

(2016). The news value of Dutch corporate press releases as a predictor of corporate agenda building power. Public Relations Review, 42, 451–458.

67.

Scharkow

. (2012). Automatische Inhaltsanalyse und maschinelles Lernen [Automatic content analysis and machine learning]. epubli.

68.

Scheufele

Haas

(2008). Medien und Aktien: Theoretische und empirische Modellierung der Rolle der Berichterstattung für das Börsengeschehen [Media and stocks: Theoretical and empirical modeling of the impact of media on the stock market]. Springer VS.

69.

Scheufele

Haas

Brosius

H. B.

(2011). Mirror or molder? A study of media coverage, stock prices, and trading volumes in Germany. Journal of Communication, 61, 48–70.

70.

Schlierer

H.-J. R.

(2004). Kulturspezifische Stilmerkmale deutscher und franzoüsischer Geschaüftsberichte: Eine kontrastive Analyse [Culture-specific style characteristics of German and French annual reports: A contrastive analysis]. Roührig Universitaütsverlag.

71.

Silberschmidt

(2013). Mehr über das Geschäft berichten [Write more about the business]. In Stücheli-Herlach

Perrin

(Eds.), Schreiben mit System: PR-Texte planen, entwerfen und verbessern [Systematic writing: Planning, designing, and improving public relations texts] (pp. 53–63). Springer VS.

72.

Sohn

Lariscy

R. W.

Tinkham

S. F.

(2009). The impact of CEO reputation: Negative news and economic decisions. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 3, 1–18.

73.

Stanton

(2002). Corporate annual reports: Research perspectives used. Accounting Auditing Account, 15, 478–500.

74.

Stevens

K. T.

Stevens

K. C.

Stevens

W. P.

(1992). Measuring the readability of business writing: The cloze procedure versus readability formulas. Journal of Business Communication, 29, 367–382.

75.

Stute

(2010). IFRS: Lagebericht und Konzernlagebericht: Grundlagen und Darstellung [IFRS: Management report and group management report: Basics and presentation]. Erich Schmidt.

76.

Subramanian

Insley

R. G.

Blackwell

R. D.

(1993). Performance and readability: A comparison of annual reports of profitable and unprofitable corporations. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 49–61.

77.

Sydserff

Weetman

(1999). A texture index for evaluating accounting narratives. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12, 459–488.

78.

Tan

H.-T.

Wang

E. Y.

Zhou

(2014). When the use of positive language backfires: The joint effect of tone, readability, and investor sophistication on earnings judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 52, 273–302.

79.

Zerfass

Verčič

Wiesenberg

(2016). Managing CEO communication and positioning: A cross-national study among corporate communication leaders. Journal of Communication Management, 20, 37–55.