This study offers a comprehensive review of data-based research on the practice of multicommunicating, that is, the behavior of participating in multiple, overlapping conversations. Initial research has occurred in various academic disciplines and described the phenomenon with a variety of terms. The authors begin by defining multicommunication and then identifying and comparing these various other terms. Next, they summarize past research, offer revised versions of five propositions concerning multicommunicating, and identify a new concept, multicommunicator aspirational stress. Finally, they offer suggestions for both pedagogy and future research on multicommunicating.
AndersA. (2016). Team communication platforms and emergent social collaboration practices. International Journal of Business Communication, 53, 224–261.
2.
BardhiF.RohmA. J.SultanF. (2010). Tuning in and tuning out: Media multitasking among young consumers. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9, 316–332.
3.
BaronN. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 397–423.
4.
BaronN. S. (2008a). Adjusting the volume: Technology and multitasking in discourse control. In KatzJ. E. (Ed.), Handbook of mobile communication studies (pp. 177–193). Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
BaronN. S. (2008b). Always on: Language in an online and mobile world. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6.
BélangerF.Watson-ManheimM. B. (2006). Virtual teams and multiple media: Structuring media use to attain strategic goals. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15, 299–321.
7.
Benbunan-FichR.AdlerR. F.MavlanovaT. (2011). Measuring multitasking behavior with activity-based metrics. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 18, Article 7.
8.
BhattiM. W.AhsanA. (2017). Effective communication among globally distributed software development teams: Development of an “effective communication” scale. Journal of Global Information Management, 25, 40–62.
9.
CameronA. F.WebsterJ. (2005). Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 85–103.
10.
CameronA-F.WebsterJ. (2011). Relational outcomes of multicommunicating: Integrating incivility and social exchange perspectives. Organization Science, 22, 754–771.
11.
CameronA-F.WebsterJ. (2013). Multicommunicating: Juggling multiple conversations in the workplace. Information Systems Research, 24, 352–371.
12.
ChudobaK. M.Watson-ManheimM. B.CrowstonK.LeeC. S. (2011). Participation in ICT-enabled meetings. Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 23, 15–36.
13.
ClarkR. A.DeliaJ. C. (1979). Topoi and rhetorical competence. Communication Monographs, 65, 187–206.
14.
CogdillS.FanderclaiT. L.KilbornJ.WilliamsM. G. (2001). Backchannel: Whispering in digital conversation. In DennisE. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-34) (pp. 1–8). Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
15.
DaricsE. (2014). The blurring boundaries between synchronicity and asynchronicity: New communication situations in work-related instant messaging. International Journal of Business Communication, 51, 337–358.
16.
DennisA. R.RenneckerJ. A.HansenS. (2010). Invisible whispering: Restructuring collaborative decision making with instant messaging. Decision Sciences, 41, 845–886.
17.
DidomenicoS. M.BoaseJ. (2013). Bringing mobiles into the conversation: Applying a conversation analytic approach to the study of mobiles in co-present interaction. In TannenD.TresterA. M. (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. 119–131). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18.
EdwardsJ. R. (1992). A cybernetic theory of stress, coping, and well-being in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 17, 238–274.
19.
ForgaysD. K.HymanI.SchreiberJ. (2014). Texting everywhere for everything: Gender and age differences in cell phone etiquette and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 314–321.
20.
GimenezJ. (2014). Multi-communication and the Business English class: Research meets pedagogy. English for Specific Purposes, 35, 1–16.
21.
GrinolsA. B.RajeshR. (2014). Multitasking with smartphones in the college classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 890–895.
22.
HaasC.CarrB. J.TakayoshiP. (2011). Building and maintaining contexts in interactive networked writing: An examination of deixis and intertextuality in instant messaging. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25, 276–298.
23.
HodgettsH. M.JonesD. M. (2006). Interruption of the tower of London task: Support for a goal-activation approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 103–115.
HymesD. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In GumperzJ.HymesD. (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 35–71). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
JacksonM. H. (2007a). Fluidity, promiscuity, and mash-ups: New concepts for the study of mobility and communication. Communication Monographs, 74, 408–413.
28.
JacksonM. H. (2007b). Should emerging technologies change business communication scholarship?Journal of Business Communication, 44, 3–12.
29.
JarrahiM. H.SawyerS. (2013). Social technologies, informal knowledge practices, and the enterprise. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 23, 110–137.
30.
JettQ. R.GeorgeJ. M. (2003). Work interrupted: A closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Academy of Management Review, 28, 494–507.
31.
KleinmanL. (2007). Physically present, mentally absent: Technology use in face-to-face meetings. Paper presented at the CHI ‘07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA. pp. 2501–2506. doi:10.1145/1240866.1241031
32.
KuznekoffJ. H.MunzS.TitsworthS. (2015). Mobile phones in the classroom: Examining the effects of texting, Twitter, and message content on student learning. Communication Education, 64, 344–365.
33.
LamC. (2012). The efficacy of text messaging to improve social connectedness and team attitude in student technical communication projects: An experimental study. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 180–208.
34.
LamC. (2016). Improving technical communication group projects: An experimental study of media synchronicity theory training on communication outcomes. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 30, 85–112.
35.
LeonardiP. M.NeeleyT. B.GerberE. M. (2012). How managers use multiple media: Discrepant events, power, and timing in redundant communication. Organization Science, 23, 98–117.
36.
LillqvistE.Louhiala-SalminenL. (2014). Facing Facebook: Impression management strategies in company–consumer interactions. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 28, 3–30.
37.
LongZ.KuangK.BuzzanellP. M. (2013). Legitimizing and elevating telework: Chinese construction of a nonstandard work arrangement. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 27, 243–262.
38.
MaginnisJ. A. (2011). Texting in the presence of others: The use of politeness strategies in conversation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kentucky, Lexington.
39.
MazmanianM.OrlikowskiW. J.YatesJ. (2013). The autonomy paradox: The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals. Organization Science, 24, 1337–1357.
40.
McCoyB. R. (2016). Digital distractions in the classroom phase II: Student classroom use of digital devices for non-class related purposes. Lincoln: University of Nebraska. Retrieved fromhttp://digitalcommons.unl.edu/journalismfacpub/90
41.
MillerJ. G. (1978). Living systems. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
42.
MillerV. D.PooleM. S.SeiboldD. R.MyersK. K.ParkH. S.MongeP.…ShumateM. (2011). Advancing research in organizational communication through quantitative methodology. Management Communication Quarterly, 25, 4–58.
43.
MurrayD. L. (1989). When the medium determines turns: Turn-taking in computer conversation. In FishmanJ. A. (Series Ed.) & ColemanH. (Vol. Ed.), Contributions to the sociology of language. Volume 52: Working with language: A multidisciplinary consideration of language use in work contexts (pp. 319–337). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter.
44.
NardiB. A.WhittakerS.BradnerE. (2000). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. In KelloggW. A. & WhittakerS. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 79–88). Philadelphia, PA: Association for Computing Machinery.
45.
NguyenD. T.FussellS. R. (2016). Effects of conversational involvement cues on understanding and emotions in instant messaging conversations. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 35, 28–55.
46.
PazosP.ChungJ. M.MicariM. (2013). Instant messaging as a task-support tool in information technology organizations. Journal of Business Communication, 50, 68–86.
47.
PeaR.NassC.MeheulaL.RanceM.KumarA.BamfordH.…ZhouM. (2012). Media use, face-to-face communication, media multitasking, and social well-being among 8- to 12-year-old girls. Developmental Psychology, 48, 327–336.
48.
ReinschN. L.JrTurnerJ. W. (2006). Ari, r u there? Reorienting business communication for a technological era. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 339–356.
49.
ReinschL. N.JrTurnerJ. W.TinsleyC. (2008). Multicommunicating: A practice whose time has come?Academy of Management Review, 33, 391–403.
50.
RenneckerJ. A.DennisA. R.HansenS. (2010). “Invisible whispering”: Restructuring meeting processes with instant messaging. In KilgourD. M.EdenC. (Eds.), Handbook of group decision and negotiation (pp. 25–45). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
51.
RenneckerJ.GodwinL. (2005). Delays and interruptions: A self-perpetuating paradox of communication technology use. Information and Organization, 15, 247–266.
52.
RiceR. E.EvansS. K.PearceK. E.SivunenA.VitakJ.TreemJ. W. (2017). Organizational media affordances: Operationalization and associations with media use. Journal of Communication, 67, 106–130.
53.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A. (2008). Threaded cognition: An integrated theory of concurrent multitasking. Psychological Review, 115, 101–130.
54.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A. (2011). The multitasking mind. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
55.
SalvucciD. D.TaatgenN. A.BorstJ. P. (2009). Toward a unified theory of the multitasking continuum: From concurrent performance to task switching, interruption, and resumption. In GreenbergS.HudsonS. E.HinckleyK.MorrisM. R.OlsenD. R.Jr (Eds.), Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI 2009 (pp. 1819–1828). Boston, MA: Association for Computing Machinery.
56.
SeoM.KimJ-H.PrabuD. (2015). Always connected or always distracted? ADHD symptoms and social assurance explain problematic use of mobile phone and multicommunicating. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 667–681.
57.
StaffordL.HillyerJ. D. (2012). Information and communication technologies in personal relationships. Review of Communication, 12, 290–312.
58.
StephensK. K. (2007). The successive use of information and communication technologies at work. Communication Theory, 17, 486–507.
59.
StephensK. K. (2012). Multiple conversations during organizational meetings: Development of the multicommunicating scale. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 195–223.
60.
StephensK. K.ChoJ. K.BallardD. I. (2012). Simultaneity, sequentiality, and speed: Organizational messages about multiple-task completion. Human Communication Research, 38, 23–47.
61.
StephensK. K.DavisJ. (2009). The social influences on electronic multitasking in organizational meetings. Management Communication Quarterly, 23, 63–83.
62.
StephensK. K.MurphyM.KeeK. F. (2012). Leveraging multicommunication in the classroom: Implications for participation and engagement. In FerrisS. P. (Ed.), Teaching and learning with the net generation: Concepts and tools for reaching digital learners (pp. 269–287). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
63.
StephensK. K.PantojaG. E. (2016). Mobile devices in the classroom: Learning motivations predict specific types of multicommunicating behaviors. Communication Education, 65, 463–479.
64.
StephensK. K.RainsS. A. (2011). Information and communication technology sequences and message repetition in interpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 38, 101–122.
65.
SzékelyL. (2015). The typology of multitasking activity. European Journal of Communication, 30, 209–225.
66.
TannenD.TresterA. M. (2013). Introduction. In TannenD.TresterA. M. (Eds.), Discourse 2.0: Language and new media (pp. ix–xiii). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
67.
TreemJ. W. (2013). Technology use as a status cue: The influences of mundane and novel technologies on knowledge assessments in organizations. Journal of Communication, 63, 1032–1053.
68.
TurnerJ. W.FossS. K. (2018). Options for the construction of attentional social presence in a digitally enhanced multicommunicative environment. Communication Theory, 28, 22–45.
69.
TurnerJ. W.ReinschN. L.Jr (2007). The business communicator as presence allocator: Multicommunicating, equivocality, and status at work. Journal of Business Communication, 44, 36–58.
70.
TurnerJ. W.ReinschN. L.Jr (2010). Successful and unsuccessful multicommunication episodes: Engaging in dialogue or juggling messages?Information Systems Frontiers, 12, 277–285.
71.
TurnerJ. W.ReinschN. L.Jr (2011). Multicommunicating and episodic presence: Developing new constructs for studying new phenomena. In WrightK. B.WebbL. M. (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication in personal relationships (pp. 181–193). New York, NY: Lang.
72.
TurnerJ. W.TinsleyC. (2002, August). Polychronic communication: Managing multiple conversations at once. Paper presented at the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
WashingtonM. C.OkoroE. A.CardonP. W. (2014). Perceptions of civility for mobile phone use in formal and informal meetings. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 52–64.
75.
WassonC. (2004). Multitasking during virtual meetings. Human Resource Planning, 27, 47–60.
76.
YankelovichN.McGinnJ.WesslerM.KaplanJ.ProvinoJ.FoxH. (2005, April). Private communications in public meetings. Paper presented at the CHI ‘05 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR. doi:10.1145/1056808.1057044
