Conceptualizing the contemporary business communicator as a presence allocator, this article introduces the concept of multicommunicating and reports two exploratory studies. The authors used qualitative and quantitative data to explore factors that influence multicommunicating behavior, an increasingly common form of polychronic behavior and multitasking. The analysis builds on the concepts of social presence and media richness to describe the contemporary worker as seeking to economize in the allocation of personal presence across multiple, interleaved interactions. In the authors’ exploratory qualitative study, they identified message equivocality and interlocutor status as two factors that seem to encourage (or discourage) multicommunicating. In the quantitative study (a 2 × 2 posttest design), the authors evaluated two hypotheses, confirming that equivocality and status influence the perceived likelihood of multicommunicating. The discussion section includes several suggestions for future research.
Asforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day’s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management Review, 25, 472-491.
2.
Barry, B., & Fulmer, I. S. (2004). The medium and the message: The adaptive use of communication media in dyadic influence. Academy of Management Review, 29, 272-292.
3.
Bergen, L., Grimes, T., & Potter, D. (2005). How attention partitions itself during simultaneous message presentations. Human Communication Research, 31, 311-336.
4.
Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
5.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kallaith, T. J., Strube, M. J., & Martin, G. D. (1999). Polychronicity and the inventory of polychronic values (IVP): The development of an instrument to measure a fundamental dimension of organizational culture. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 14(3/4), 205-230.
6.
Bluedorn, A. C., Kaufman, C. F., & Lane, P. M. (1992). How many things do you like to do at once? An introduction to monochronic and polychronic time. Academy of Management Executive, 6(4), 17-26.
7.
Bostrom, R. (Ed.). (1984). Competence in communication: A multidisciplinary approach. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
Burleson, B. R., & Planalp, S. (2000). Producing emotion(al) messages. Communication Theory, 10, 221-250.
9.
Cameron, A. F., & Webster, J. (2005). Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 85-103.
10.
Capella, J. N. (1994). The management of conversational interaction in adults and infants. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 380-418). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
Carlson, J. R., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153-170.
12.
Chun, M. M., & Potter, M. C. (2001). The attentional blink and task switching within and across modalities. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 20-35). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
13.
Cole, W., Steptoe, S., & Dale, S. (2006, March 27). The multitasking generation. Time, 167, 48-55.
14.
Conte, J. M., & Jacobs, R. R. (2003). Validity evidence linking polychronicity and big five personality dimensions to absence, lateness, and supervisory performance ratings. Human Performance, 16, 107-129.
15.
Crosson, B. (2000a). Systems that support language processes: Attention. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzalez Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 372-398). New York: Guilford.
16.
Crosson, B. (2000b). Systems that support language processes: Verbal working memory. In S. E. Nadeau, L. J. Gonzalez Rothi, & B. Crosson (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 399-418). New York: Guilford.
17.
D’Ambra, J., Rice, R. E., & O’Connor, M.. (1998). Computer-mediated communication and media preference: An investigation of the dimensionality of perceived task equivocality and media richness. Behaviour and Information Technology, 17, 164-174.
18.
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial information processing and organizational design. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (pp. 191-233). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
19.
Daft, R., & Lengel, R. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
20.
Daft, R., Lengel, R., & Trevino, L. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11, 355-367.
21.
Damos, D. L. (1991). Multiple-task performance. London: Taylor & Francis.
22.
Davenport, T. H., & Beck, J. C. (2002). The attention economy: Understanding the new currency of business. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
23.
DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organization Science, 5, 121-147.
24.
Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E., Root, R. W., & Rice, R. E. (1993). Video as a technology for informal communication. Communications of the ACM, 36, 48-61.
25.
Fletcher, C. (1990). The relationships between candidate personality, self-presentation strategies, and interviewer assessments in selection interviews: An empirical study. Human Relations, 43, 739-749.
26.
Frederick, W. C. (1992). Anchoring values in nature: Toward a theory of business values. Business Ethics Quarterly, 2, 283-303.
27.
Fulk, J. (1993). Social construction of communication technology. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 921-950.
28.
Fulk, J., & Boyd, B. (1991). Emerging theories of communication in organizations. Journal of Management, 17, 407-446.
29.
Fulk, J., Schmitz, J. A., & Steinfield, C. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117-142). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30.
Fulk, J., & Steinfield, C. (Eds.). (1990). Organizations and communication technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31.
Fulk, J., Steinfield, C., Schmitz, J., & Power, J. G. (1987). A social information processing model of media use in organizations. Communication Research, 14(5), 529-552.
32.
Gabarro, J. J. (1990). The development of working relationships. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of cooperative work (pp. 79-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
33.
Gabarro, J. J., & Kotter, J. P. (1980, January-February). Managing your boss. Harvard Business Review, pp. 92-100.
34.
Gergen, K. J. (2000). The saturated self: Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.
35.
Gergen, K. J. (2002). The challenge of absent presence. In J. E. Katz & M. Aakhus (Eds.), Perpetual contact: Mobile communication, private talk, public performance (pp. 227-241). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
36.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor.
37.
Greene, J. (2000). Evanescent mentation: An ameliorative conceptual foundation for research and theory on message production. Communication Theory, 10, 139-155.
38.
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
39.
Hall, E. T. (1966). The hidden dimension. New York: Anchor.
40.
Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Garden City, NY: Anchor.
41.
Hargie, O. D. W. (Ed.). (1997). The handbook of communication skills (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
42.
Johansen, R., Valee, J., & Spangler, K. (1979). Electronic meetings: Technical alternatives and social choices. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
43.
Kacmar, K. M., & Carlson, D. S. (1999). Effectiveness of impression management tactics across human resource situations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 1293-1315.
44.
Kaufman, C. F., Lane, P. M., & Linquist, J. D. (1991). Exploring more than 24 hours a day: A preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 392-401.
45.
Kaufman-Scarborough, C., & Linquist, J. D. (2003). Understanding the experience of time-scarcity—Linking consumer time-personality and marketplace behavior. Time and Society, 12, 349-370.
46.
Kraut, R. E., Rice, R. E., Cool, C., & Fish, R. S. (1998). Varieties of social influence: The role of utility and norms in the success of a new communication medium. Organization Science, 9, 437-453.
47.
Leary, M. R., & Kowalski, R. M. (1990). Impression management: A literature review and two-component model. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 34-47.
48.
Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28, 612-625.
49.
Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (2001). Multiple sources of interference in dual-task performance: The cases of the attentional blink and the psychological refractory period. In K. Shapiro (Ed.), The limits of attention: Temporal constraints in human information processing (pp. 124-140). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
50.
Marks, S. R. (1994). Intimacy in the public realm: The case of co-workers. Social Forces, 72, 843-858.
51.
Marschak, J. (1968). Economics of inquiring, communicating, deciding. American Economic Review, 58(2), 1-18.
52.
Miller, J. G. (1978). Living systems. New York: McGraw-Hill.
53.
Monge, P. R., Bachman, S. G., Dillard, J. P., & Eisenberg, E. M. (1982). Communication competence in the workplace: Model testing and scale development. In M. Burgoon, (Ed.), Communication yearbook 5 (pp. 505-527). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
54.
Ong, W. J. (1981). The presence of the word: Some prolegomena for cultural and religious history. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
55.
Ong, W. J. (1992). Technology outside us and inside us. In W. J. Ong, Faith and contexts, Vol. 1: Selected essays and studies 1952-1991 (T. J. Farrell & P. A. Soukup, Eds., pp. 189-208). Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press.
56.
Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2002). It’s about time: Temporal structuring in organizations. Organization Science, 13, 684-700.
57.
Orlikowski, W., Yates, J., Okamura, K., & Fujimoto, M. (1995). Shaping electronic communication: The metastructuring of technology in the context of use. Organization Science, 6(4), 423-443.
58.
Parks, M. (1994). Communicative competence and interpersonal control. In M. Knapp & G. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 589-620). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
Perey, C. (2004). If you can’t beat IM join IM. Newwork World, 21, 33-35.
60.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
61.
Reinsch, N. L., Jr., & Beswick, R. W. (1990). Voice mail versus conventional channels: A cost minimization analysis of individuals’ preferences. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 801-816.
62.
Rice, R. E. (with Hart, P., Torobin, J., Shook, D., Tyler, J., Svenning, L., & Ruchinskas, J.). (1992). Task analyzability, use of new media, and effectiveness: A multi-site exploration of media richness. Organization Science, 3, 475-500.
63.
Rice, R., D’Ambra, J., & More, E. (1998). Cross-cultural comparison of organizational media evaluation and choice. Journal of Communication, 48, 3-26.
64.
Russ, G. S., Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Media selection and managerial characteristics in organizational communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 4, 151-175.
65.
Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
66.
Schneider, D. J. (1981). Tactical self-presentations: Toward a broader conception. In J. T. Tedeschi (Ed.), Impression management theory and social psychological research (pp. 23-40). New York: Academic Press.
67.
Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The social psychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
68.
Simon, H. A. (1997). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Free Press.
69.
Spitzberg, B. H. (1994). The dark side of (in)competence. In W. R. Cupach & B. H. Spitzberg (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (pp. 25-49). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
70.
Stivers, R. (2004). Shades of loneliness: Pathologies of a technological society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
71.
Trevino, L. K., Daft, R. L, & Lengel, R. H. (1990). Understanding managers’ media choices: A symbolic interactionist perspective. In J. Fulk & C. Steinfield (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 71-94). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
72.
Trevino, L., Lengel, R., & Daft, R. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 553-574.
73.
Turner, J. W., & Tinsley, C. (2002, August). Polychronic communication: Managing multiple conversations at once. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Denver, CO.
74.
Turner, J. W., Grube, J., Tinsley, C., Lee, C., & O’Pell, C. (2006). Exploring the dominant media: How does media use reflect organizational norms and affect performance?Journal of Business Communication, 43(3), 220-250.
75.
Vickery, S. K., Droge, C., Stank, T. P., Goldsby, T. J., & Markland, R. E. (2004). The performance implications of media richness in a business-to-business service environment: Direct versus indirect effects. Management Science, 50, 1106-1119.
76.
Waller, M. J. (1997). Keeping the pins in the air: How work groups juggle multiple tasks. In M. M. Beyerlein, D. A. Johnson, & S. T. Beyerlein (Eds.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams, Vol. 4: Team implementation issues (pp. 217-247). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
77.
Wallis, C., & Steptoe, S. (2006, January 16). Help! I’ve lost my focus. Time, 167, 72-77.
78.
Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J., & Jackson, D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
79.
Wiemann, J. M., Takai, J., Ota, H., & Wiemann, M. O. (1997). A relational model of communication competence. In B. Kovacic (Ed.), Emerging theories of human communication (pp. 25-44). Albany: State University of New York Press.
80.
Yates, J., Orlikowski, W. J., & Okamura, K. (1999). Explicit and implicit structuring of genres in electronic communication: Reinforcement and change of social interaction. Organization Science, 10, 83-103.
81.
Zhang, Y., Goonetilleke, R. S., Plocher, T., & Liang S. F. M. (2005). Time-related behaviour in multitasking situations. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 62, 425-455.
82.
Zmud, R. W., Lind, M. R., & Young, F. W. (1990). An attribute space for organizational communication channels. Information Systems Research, 1, 440-457.
83.
Zorn, T. E. (1995). Bosses and buddies: Constructing and performing simultaneously hierarchical and close-friendship relationships. In J. T. Wood & S. Duck (Eds.), Under-studied relationships: Off the beaten track (pp. 122-147). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
