To contribute to critical public relations (PR) and communication research, the authors employ an institutional perspective in examining how actors conceptualize PR and make sense of PR practice in relation to their shared and competing logics. Specifically, they highlight the primacy of logics and identities in the social construction of PR by exploring how a wide range of actors interpret and understand PR in Chinese cultural contexts. In conducting 40 semistructured interviews with PR agency consultants, in-house PR practitioners, media journalists, and industry association officers, the authors have found multiple and competing logics within the field that, in turn, confer reconciled identities on Chinese PR. The Chinese cultural contexts serve as a repertoire for stakeholders to draw institutional logics and legitimize their interpretations of PR practice in China.
AlbertS.WhettenD. (1985). Organizational identity. In CummingsL. L.StawB. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (pp. 263–295). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
2.
Al-EnadA. H. (1990). Public relations’ roles in developing countries. Public Relations Quarterly, 35, 24–26.
3.
AlvessonM.AshcraftK. L.ThomasR. (2008). Identity matters: Reflections on the construction of identity scholarship in organization studies. Organization, 15, 5–28.
4.
AufrechtS. E.BunL. S. (1995). Reform with Chinese characteristics: The context of Chinese civil service reform. Public Administration Review, 55, 175–182.
5.
BartlettJ. L.TywoniakS.HatcherC. A. (2007). Public relations professional practice and the institutionalization of CSR. Journal of Communication Management, 11, 281–299.
6.
BlackS. (1990–1991). Public relations in China today. Public Relations Quarterly, 35, 29–30.
7.
BotanC. (1992). International public relations: Critique and reformulation. Public Relations Review, 18, 149–159.
8.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.
10.
BroomG. M. (2009). Cultip and center’s public relations (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
11.
BrownR. (2012). Epistemological modesty: Critical reflections on public relations thought. Public Relations Inquiry, 1, 89–105.
12.
BurnsR. B. (2000). Introduction to research methods (4th ed). New South Wales, Australia: Pearson Education.
13.
CalleroP. L. (2003). The sociology of the self. In CookK. S.HaganJ. (Eds.), Annual review of sociology: Vol. 29 (pp. 115–133). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
14.
ChangS. (2011). Field, guanxi and hidden transcripts: A study of the work practices of Taiwan TV producers in China. Brisbane, Australia: University of Queensland.
15.
ChenM. (2001). Inside Chinese business: A guide for managers worldwide. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
16.
ChenN. (1992). Public relations in China: The introduction and development of an occupational field. Athens: Ohio University.
17.
ChenN. (1996). Public relations in China: The introduction and development of an occupational field. In CulbertsonH.HughM.ChenN. (Eds.), International public relations: A comparative analysis (pp. 121–154). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18.
ChenN. (2009). Institutionalizing public relations: A case study of Chinese government crisis communication on the 2008 Sichuan earthquake. Public Relations Review, 35, 187–198.
19.
ChenY. R. (2004). Effective public affairs in China: MNC-government bargaining power and corporate strategies for influencing foreign business policy formulation. Journal of Communication Management, 8, 395–423.
20.
CreedW. E. D.DejordyR.JacoL. (2010). Being the change: Resolving institutional contradiction through identity work. Academy of Management Journal, 53, 1336–1364.
21.
CurtinP. A.GaitherT. K. (2005). Privileging identity, difference, and power: The circuit of culture as a basis for public relations theory. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17, 91–115.
22.
CzarniawskaB. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
23.
EwenS. (1996). PR! A social history of spin. New York, NY: Basic Books.
24.
FeiX. (1985). Shihui Diaocha Zibao [Statement regarding social investigations]. Shanghai, Republic of China: Zhishi Chuban She.
25.
GilroyP. (1997). Diaspora and the detours of identity. In WoodwardK. (Ed.), Identity and difference (pp. 299–343). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
26.
GowerK. K. (2006). Public relations at the crossroads. Public Relations Review, 18, 177–190.
27.
GrunigJ. E. (1992). What is excellence in management. In GrunigJ. E. (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (p. 231). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
GrunigJ. E.GrunigL. A. (1992). Models of public relations and communication. In GrunigJ. E. (Ed.), Excellence in public relations and communication management (pp. 285–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
GrunigJ. E.HuntT. (1984). Managing public relations. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
30.
HackleyC. A.DongQ. (2001). American public relations networking encounters China’s guanxi. Public Relations Quarterly, 46, 16–19.
31.
HeY.TianZ. (2008). Government-oriented corporated public relations strategies in transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 4, 367–391.
32.
HeathR. L. (Ed. (2009). The rhetorical tradition: Wrangle in the marketplace. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
HillJ. W. (1993). The making of a public relations man. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Business Books.
34.
HoffmanA. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 351–371.
35.
HouZ.ZhuY. (2012). An institutional perspective of public relations practices in the Chinese cultural contexts. Public Relations Review, 38, 916–925.
36.
HuangY. H. (1997). Public relations strategies, relational outcomes and conflict management. College Park: University of Maryland.
37.
HuangY. H. (2000). The personal influence model and gao guanxi in Taiwan Chinese public relations. Public Relations Review, 26, 216–239.
38.
HuttonJ. G. (1999). The definition, dimensions and domain of public relations. Public relations Review, 25, 199–214.
39.
JackallR. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
40.
KiratM. (2005). Public relations practice in the Arab World: A critical assessment. Public Relations Review, 31, 323–332.
41.
MacnamaraJ. (2012). Public relations: Theories, practices and critiques. New South Wales, Australia: Pearson Australia.
42.
MarquisC.LounsburyM. (2007). Vive la resistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 799–820.
43.
Schilling-EstesN. (2004). Constructing ethnicity in interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 163–195.
44.
ScottW. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45.
ShengY. (2009). Playing the Chinese “face” orchestra: An interview with the vice president Sun Yuhong of Hill & Knowlton in China (in Chinese). Public Relations World, 2, 15–21.
46.
SrirameshK.VercicD. (2001). International public relations: A framework for future research. Journal of Communication Management, 6, 103–117.
47.
StraussA.CorbinJ. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
48.
SuddabyR. (2010). Challenges for institutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 19, 14–20.
49.
SwidlerA. (1986). Culture in action: Symbols and strategies. American Sociological Review, 51, 273–286.
50.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (2008). Institutional logics. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.SahlinK. (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organisational institutionalism. London, England: Sage.
51.
VercicD. (2000). The European body of knowledge. Journal of Communication Management, 6, 166–175.
52.
VercicD.GrunigJ. E. (2000). The origins of public relations theory in economics and strategic management. In MossD.VercicD.WarnabyG. (Eds.), Perspective on public relations research (pp. 9–58). London, England: Routledge.
53.
VercicD.RulerB. V.ButschiG.FlodinB. (2001). On the definition of public relations: A European view. Public Relations Review, 27, 373–387.
54.
WangH. Y. (2004). Back to the root: The Confucian self and an ecology of personal cultivation. In WangH. Y. (Ed.), The call from the stranger on a journey home: Curriculum in a third space (pp. 53–86). Lang, NY: Spring Netherlands.
55.
WilcoxD. L.AultP. H.AgeeW. K. (1998). Public relations: Strategies and tactics. New York, NY: Longman.
56.
WilliamsR. H. (2004). The cultural contexts of collective action: Constraints, opportunities, and the symbolic life of social movements. In SnowD. A.SouleS. A.KriesiH. (Eds.), The Blackwell companion to social movement (pp. 91–115). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
57.
WilsonG.HerndlC. G. (2007). Boundary objects as rhetorical exigence: Knowledge mapping and interdisciplinary cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 21, 129–154.
58.
WuX. (2002). Doing PR in China: A 2001 version: Concepts, practices and some misperceptions. Public Relations Quarterly, 47(2), 10–18.
59.
YangM. (1988). The modernity of power in the Chinese socialist order. Cultural Anthropology, 3, 408–427.
60.
YangM. (1994). Gifts favours and banquets: The art of social realtionships in China. New York, NY: Cornell University Press.
61.
ZhangA. (2010). Understanding Chinese public relations education: A cultural and critical perspective. College Park: University of Maryland.
62.
ZhuY. (2009). Managing business relationships in New Zealand and China: A semantic perspective. Management International Review, 49, 225–248.
63.
ZhuY.NelP.BhatR. (2006). A cross-cultural study of communication strategies for building business relationships. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 6, 319–341.
