Telework—the performance of paid labor activities at sites other than conventional workplaces and through the use of communication technologies—has not been considered a legitimate work form in China. Analyzing in-depth interviews thematically, the authors found that teleworkers from the post-80s generation not only legitimized their work form pragmatically and morally but also elevated it as a better choice for more achievement, flexibility, autonomy, efficiency, and professional development. Although they evaluated their choice positively, these teleworkers also acknowledged the unique challenges in cultivating guanxi (building relationships) and careers in China when working remotely. The authors suggest that telework in China offers a contested site for studying the dialectic tensions between traditional Chinese values and Western business discourses.
BallardD. I.GossettL. M. (2007). Alternative times: The temporal perceptions, processes, and practices defining the non-standard work arrangement. In BeckC. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook31 (pp. 269–316). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2.
BuzzanellP. M.EllingsonL.SilvioC.PaschV.DaleB.MauroG.MartinC. (1997). Leadership processes in alternative organizations: Invitational and dramaturgical leadership. Communication Studies, 48, 285–310. doi:10.1080/10510979709368509
3.
BuzzanellP. M.LucasK. (2013). Constrained and constructed choice in career: An examination of communication pathways to dignity. In CohenE. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook37 (pp. 3–31). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
CharmazK. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CheneyG.KendallB.LairD.RitzD. (2010). Just a job? Communication, ethics, and professional life. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
CheneyG.ZornT. E.JrPlanalpS.LairD. J. (2008). Meaningful work and personal/social well-being: Organizational communication engages the meanings of work. In BeckC. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook32 (pp. 137–186). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7.
CiullaJ. B. (2000). The working life: The promise and betrayal of modern work. New York, NY: Times Books.
8.
DipboyeR. L. (2005). The selection/recruitment interview: Core processes and contexts. In EversA.AndersonN.VoskuijlO. (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of personnel selection. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
9.
DunningJ. H.KimC. (2007). The cultural roots of guanxi: An exploratory study. The World Economy, 30, 329–341. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.00885.x
10.
DwyerJ. (Eds.). (2011). The business communication handbook (9th ed.). New South Wales, Australia: Pearson.
11.
FairhurstG. T. (2001). Dualisms in leadership communication. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 379–439). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12.
FitzerM. M. (1997). Managing from afar: Performance and rewards in a telecommuting environment. Compensation and Benefits Review, 29, 65–73.
13.
FonnerK. L.RoloffM. E. (2010). Why teleworkers are more satisfied with their jobs than are office-based workers: When less contact is beneficial. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 336–361. doi:10.1080/00909882.2010.513998
14.
FonnerK. L.RoloffM. E. (2012). Testing the connectivity paradox: Linking teleworkers’ communication media use to social presence, stress from interruptions, and organizational identification. Communication Monographs, 79, 205–231. doi:10.1080/03637751.2012.673000
15.
GibbsJ.ScottC.KimY. H.LeeS. K. (2010). Examining tensions in telework policies. In LongS. (Ed.), Communication, relationships and practices in virtual work (pp. 1–25). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
16.
GreenS. E.LiY.NohriaN. (2009). Suspended in self-spun webs of significance: A rhetorical model of institutionalization and institutionally embedded agency. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 11–36. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.36461725
17.
HylmöA. (2006). Telecommuting and the contestability of choice: Employee strategies to legitimize personal decisions to work in a preferred location, management. Communication Quarterly, 19, 541–569. doi:10.1177/0893318905284762
18.
HylmöA.BuzzanellP. M. (2002). Telecommuting as viewed through cultural lenses: An empirical investigation of the discourses of utopia, identity, and mystery. Communication Monographs, 69, 329–356. doi:10.1080/03637750216547
19.
JoiceK. (1998). History of telework. San Francisco, CA: Telework Online America Curriculum.
20.
KleinH.MolloyJ.BrinsfieldC. (2012). Reconceptualizing workplace commitment to redress a stretched construct: Revisiting assumptions and removing confounds. Academy of Management Review, 37, 130–151. doi:10.5465/amr.2010.0018
21.
LeonardiP. M.TreemJ. W.JacksonM. H. (2010). The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38, 85–105. doi:10.1080/00909880903483599
22.
LindlofT. R.TaylorB. C. (2002). Qualitative communication research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
23.
ListerK.HarnishT. (2011). The state of telework in the U.S.: How individuals, business, and government benefit. San Diego, CA: Telework Research Network.
24.
LucasK.LiuM.BuzzanellP. M. (2006). No limits careers: A critical examination of career discourse in the U.S. and China. International and Intercultural Communication Annual, 28, 217–242.
25.
MumbyD. K.StohlC. (1996). Disciplining organizational communication studies. Management Communication Quarterly, 10, 50–72. doi:10.1177/0893318996010001004
26.
OwenW. F. (1984). Interpretive themes in relational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 70, 274–287. doi:10.1080/00335638409383697
27.
PerlowL. (1998). Boundary control: The social ordering of work and family time in a high-tech corporation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 328–357.
28.
PutnamL. L. (2012). Looking back, looking forward: A tribute to MCQ and my colleagues. Management Communication Quarterly, 26, 510–520. doi:10.1177/0893318912454576
29.
ReinschN. L.TurnerJ. W. (2006). Ari, R U There? Reorienting business communication for a technological era. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 339–356. doi:10.1177/1050651906287257
30.
SpinuzziC. (2012). Working alone together: Coworking as emergent collaborative activity. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26, 399–441. doi:10.1177/1050651912444070
31.
SuchmanM. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
SunJ.WangX. (2010). Value difference between generations in China: A study in Shanghai. Journal of Youth Studies, 13, 65–81. doi:10.1080/13676260903173462
34.
TsuiA. S.SchoonhovenC. B.MeyerM. W.LauC. M.MilkovichG. T. (2004). Organization and management in the midst of societal transformation: The People’s Republic of China. Organization Science, 15, 133–144.
35.
WapshottR.MallettO. (2012). The spatial implications of homeworking: A Lefebvrian approach to the rewards and challenges of home-based work. Organization, 19, 63–79. doi:10.1177/1350508411405376
36.
ZhuY.LiL. (2009). China. In Bargiela-ChiappiniF. (Ed.), The handbook of business discourse (pp. 345–355). Edinburgh, England: Edinburgh University Press.
