Based on a quantitative survey of Norwegian business travelers, this study compares their use of face-to-face (FTF) meetings and videoconferences (VCs). The study finds that access and use of VCs are determined mainly by industry and the geographical structure of the enterprise. It also finds that VCs and FTF meetings differ along several dimensions, suggesting that these two modes of communication fulfill slightly different needs. Based on the survey results, the authors propose a framework to understand the emerging role of VCs. This framework would address both relational and task-based dimensions.
AdlerP. S.HeckscherC. (2006). Towards a collaborative community. In HeckscherC.AdlerP. (Eds.), The firm as a collaborative community (pp. 11–105). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2.
AdlerP. S.KwonS. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Journal, 27, 17–40.
3.
AguileraA. (2008). Business travel and mobile workers. Transportation Research Part A, 42, 1109–1116.
4.
AndreevP.SalomonI.PliskinN. (2010). Review: State of teleactivities. Transportation Research Part C, 18, 3–20.
5.
ArnfalkP.KoggB. (2003). Service transformation: Managing a shift from business travel to virtual meetings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 11, 859–872.
6.
AsheimB.CoenenL.VangJ. (2007). Face-to-face, buzz, and knowledge bases: Sociospatial implications for learning, innovation, and innovation policy. Environment and Planning C–Government and Policy, 25, 655–670.
7.
BarleyS. R.KundaG. (2001). Bringing work back in. Organizational Science, 12, 76–95.
8.
BijkerW. E.LawJ. (1992). General introduction. In BijkerW. E.LawJ. (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
9.
CarlsonJ. R.ZmudR. W. (1999). Channel expansion theory and the experimental nature of media richness perception. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 153–170.
10.
CastellsM. (1996). The rise of the network society; the information age: Economy, society and culture. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11.
CohenD.PrusakL. (2001). In good company: How social capital makes organizations work. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
12.
DenstadliJ. M. (2004). Impacts of videoconferencing on business travel: The Norwegian experience. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 371–376.
13.
DenstadliJ. M.GripsrudM. (2010). Face-to-face by travel or picture: The relationship between travelling and video communication in business settings. In BeaverstockJ. V.DerudderB.FaulconbridgeJ.WitloxF. (Eds.), International business travel in the global economy (pp. 217–238). Farnham, England: Ashgate.
14.
DenstadliJ. M.JulsrudT. E. (2003). Videoconferencing in Norwegian industry and commerce: Increased use, less travel?Oslo, Norway: Institute of Transport Economics.
15.
DenstadliJ. M.RidengA. (2010). Norwegian air travel survey 2010. Oslo, Norway: Institute of Transport Economics.
16.
DickenP. (2007). The global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy. London, England: SAGE.
17.
DruckerP. (1994). Post-capitalist society. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
18.
DuarteD. L.SnyderN. T. (2001). Virtual teams: Strategies, tools and techniques that work. Chichester, England: Wiley.
19.
FaulconbridgeJ. R.BeaverstockJ. V. (2010). Geographies of interpersonal business travel in the professional service economy. In HislopD. (Ed.), Mobility and technology in the workplace (pp. 87–101). London, NY: Routledge.
20.
FulkJ.Collins-JarvisL. (2001). Wired meetings: Technological mediation of organizational gatherings. In JablinF. M.PutnamL. L. (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication (pp. 624–663). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
FulkJ.SchmidtzJ.SteinfieldC. W. (1990). A social influence model of technology use. In FulkJ.SteinfieldC. W. (Eds.), Organizations and communication technology (pp. 117–140). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
22.
GabbayS. M.LeendersA. J. (2001). Social capital of organizations: From social structure to the management of corporate social capital. In GabbayS. M.LeendersA. J. (Eds.), Social capital of organizations (pp. 1–20). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science.
23.
GeelsF. W.SmithW. A. (2000). Failed technology futures: Pitfalls and lessons from a historical survey. Futures, 32, 867–885.
24.
HandyC. (1995). Trust and the virtual organization: How do you manage people whom you do not see?Harvard Business Review, 73, 40–50.
25.
HaynesP. (2010). Information and communication technology and international business travel: Mobility allies?Mobilities, 5, 547–564.
26.
HeckscherC. (1994). Defining the post-bureaucratic type. In HeckscherC.DonnelonA. (Eds.), The post-bureaucratic organization: New perspectives on organizational change (pp. 14–62). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
HindsP.KieslerS. (2002). Distributed work. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
28.
KieslerS.CummingsJ. N. (2002). What do we know about proximity and distance in work groups? A legacy of research. In HindsP.KieslerS. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 57–82). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
KloppenborgT. J.PetrickJ. A. (1999). Meeting management and group character development. Journal of Managerial Issues, 11, 166–179.
30.
KockN. (2005). Media richness or media naturalness? The evolution of our biological communication apparatus and its influence on our behavior. Toward e-communication tools. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 48, 117–127.
31.
KrautR.FusselS. R, Brennan, S. E.SiegelJ. (2002). Understanding effects of proximity on collaboration: Implications for technology to support remote collaborative work. In HindsP.KieslerS. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 137–163). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
32.
LarsenJ.UrryJ.AxhausenK. (2008). Coordinating face-to-face meetings in mobile network societies. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 640–658.
33.
LianJ. I.DenstadliJ. M. (2004). Norwegian business air travel: Segments and trends. Journal of Air Transport Management, 10, 109–118.
34.
LinN. (2001). Social capital: A theory of social structure and action. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
35.
LuJ. L.PeetaS. (2009). Analysis of the factors that influence the relationship between business air travel and videoconferencing. Transportation Research Part A, 43, 709–721.
36.
McGrathJ. E.HollingsheadA. B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues and an agenda. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
37.
MokD.CarrascoJ. A.WellmanB. (2009). Does distance still matter in the age of the Internet?Urban Studies, 46, 2747–2783.
38.
MokhtarianP. L. (2003). Telecommunications and travel: The case for complementarity. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 6, 43–57.
39.
MokhtarianP. L.MeenakshisundaramR. (1999). Beyond tele-substitution: Disaggregate longitudinal structural equation modeling of communication impacts. Transportation Research Part C, 7, 33–52.
40.
NahapietJ.SumantraG. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 242–266.
41.
NardiB.WhittakerS. (2002). The place of face-to-face communication in distributed work. In HindsP.KieslerS. (Eds.), Distributed work (pp. 83–111). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42.
NohriaN.EcclesR. G. (1991). Face-to-face: Making network organizations work. In NohriaN.EcclesR. (Eds.), Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action (pp. 288–308). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
43.
PotterJ. (2004). Theory of media literacy: A cognitive approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
44.
RettieR. (2010). Mobile phones as social capital. Mobilities, 3, 291–311.
45.
SalomonI. (1986). Telecommunications and travel relationships: A review. Transportation Research Part A, 20, 223–238.
46.
SchwartzmanH. (1989). The meeting: Gathering in organizations and communities. New York, NY: Plenum.
47.
ShortJ. A.WilliamsE.ChristieB. (1976). The social psychology of the telecommunications. London, England: John Wiley.
48.
SilverstoneR.HaddonL. (1996). Design and domestication of information and communication technologies: Technical change and everyday life. In SilverstoneR.MansellR. (Eds.), Communication by design: The politics of information and communication technologies (pp. 45–72). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
49.
StorperM.VenablesA. (2004). Buzz: Face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 85, 351–70.
50.
TrevinoL. K.LengelR. H.DaftR. L. (1987). Media symbolism, media richness, and media choice in organizations. Communication Research, 14, 553–574.
51.
UrryJ. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
52.
WaltherJ. B.ParksM. (2002). Cues filtered out, cues filtered in. In KnappM.DalyJ. A. (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 529–563). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
53.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in oganizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
