This article uses both actor network theory (ANT) and activity theory to trace and analyze the ways in which both Twitter and third-party applications support the development and maintenance of meaningful contexts for Twitter participants. After situating context within the notion of a ‘‘fire space’’, the authors use ANT to trace the actors that support finding and moving information. Then they analyze the ‘‘prescriptions’’ of each application using the activity-theory distinction between actions and operations. Finally, they combine an activity-theory analysis with heuristics derived from the concept of ‘‘findability’’ in order to explore design implications for Social Web applications.
Akrich, M., & Latour, B. ( 1992). A summary of a convenient vocabulary for the semiotics of human and nonhuman assemblies. In J. Law (Ed.), Shaping technology/ building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 259-264). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
Callon, M. ( 1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action, & belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196-229). London, England: Routledge.
3.
Geisler, C., Bazerman, C., Doheny-Farina, S., Gurak, L., Hass, C., Johnson-Eilola, J., ... Yates, J. ( 2001). IText: Future directions for research on the relationship between information technology and writing. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 269-308.
4.
Jenkins, H. ( 2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide . New York: New York University Press.
5.
Johnson-Eilola, J. ( 2005). Datacloud: Toward a new theory of online work. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
6.
Jones, D., & Potts, L. ( 2010). Best practices for designing third-party applications for contextually-aware tools. In SIGDOC ’10: Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 95-102). New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery.
7.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B.A. ( 1997). Activity theory: Basic concepts and applications. Proceedings of CHI 97 (pp. 158-159). New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery.
8.
Kaptelinin, V., & Nardi, B.A. ( 2006). Acting with technology: Activity theory and interaction design. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
9.
Kuutti, K. ( 1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.
Latour, B. ( 1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Latour, B. ( 1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
12.
Latour, B. ( 2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory . Oxford, UK: Oxford Press.
13.
Law, J. ( 1999). After ANT: Complexity, naming, and topology. In J. Law & J. Hassard (Eds.), Actor network theory and after (pp. 1-15). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
14.
Law, J., & Mol, A. ( 2003). Situating technoscience: An inquiry into spatialities . Retrieved from http://www.comp.lancs.ac.uk/sociology/papers/Law-Mol-Situating-Technoscience.pdf
15.
McNely, B.J. ( 2009). Backchannel peristance and collaborative meaning-making. In SIGODOC ’09: Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Design of Communication (pp. 297-303). New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery.
16.
Morville, P. ( 2005). Ambient findability. Sebastopol, CA : O’Reilly.
17.
Nardi, B.A. ( 1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA : MIT Press.
18.
Potts, L. ( 2008). Diagramming with actor network theory: A method for modeling holistic experience. Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference (pp. 1-6). Montreal, Canada: IEEE.
19.
Potts, L. ( 2009). Using actor network theory to trace and improve multimodal communication design. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18, 281-301.
20.
Schroeder, S. ( 2010). Twitter mouseover security flaw affecting thousands of users [WARNING]. Mashable.com. Retrieved from http://mashable.com/2010/09/21/twitter-mouseover-bug/
21.
Spinuzzi, C. ( 2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications . New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Spinuzzi, C. ( 2009). Starter ecologies: Introduction to the special issue on social software. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 23, 251-262.
23.
Stolley, K. ( 2009). Integrating social media into existing work environments . Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 23, 350-371.
24.
Suchman, L.A. ( 1994). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Swarts, J. ( 2010). Recycled writing: Assembling actor networks from reusable content. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 24, 127-163.
26.
Twitter. (2010). Twitter is the best way to discover what’s new in your world. Retrieved from http://twitter.com/about
27.
Wauters, R. ( 2009). Twitter spawned 50,000 apps to date, will open up firehose for more. TechCrunch. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2009/12/09/twitter-le-web-2009/
28.
Zhao, D., & Rosson, M.B. ( 2009). How and why people Twitter: The role that microblogging plays in informal communication at work. In Proceedings of GROUP ’04 (pp. 243-252). New York, NY: Association of Computing Machinery.
