In technical and professional communication (TPC) there have been calls to locate the field in transnational contexts. Aligned with the social justice turn in TPC is an emergent body of critical and decolonial scholarship attending to power, privilege, and positionality. The following study extends this scholarship through attention to these issues in an emergent startup ecosystem in the occupied Palestinian territory (oPt). Grounded in mobility studies, this telling case attends to the strategic manner in which a female entrepreneur navigates this system through a process of networking, or knotworking, as she navigates both patriarchal and colonial systems of oppression. Central to this process is the complex way she mobilizes a multimodal and spatial repertoire—conceptualized as repertoires of resistance. These moves shape not only the ways that she traverses the social, semiotic, and geographic landscape, but also the shifting nature of the landscape itself. Methodologically such moves entail a conceptual shift from a focus on activity systems to mobility systems.
AgarM. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. Harper Collins.
9.
AgbokaG. Y. (2014). Decolonial methodologies: Social justice perspectives in intercultural technical communication research. Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 44(3), 297-327
10.
AgbokaG. Y.DorpenyoI. K. (2022). Curricular efforts in technical communication after the social justice turn. Technical Communication Quarterly, 31(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2021.2000574
11.
AlthalathiniD. (2024). Women entrepreneurs in Palestine. In NzikuD. M.DanaL.-P.ClausenH. B.SalamzadehA. (Eds.), Asia-Pacific business series (Vol. 14, pp. 221–251). World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811283499_0011
12.
AlthalathiniD.TlaissH. A. (2023). Of resistance to patriarchy and occupation through a virtual bazaar: An institutional theory critique of the emancipatory potential of Palestinian women’s digital entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 35(9–10), 956–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2023.2241412
BaniyaS. (2024). Transnational assemblages: Social justice and crisis communication during disaster. WAC Clearinghouse.
15.
BartonB. F.BartonM. S. (1993). Ideology and the map: Toward a postmodern visual design practice. Professional communication: The social perspective, 49-78.
16.
BazermanC.RussellD. R. (2003). Writing selves, writing societies: Research from activity perspectives. WAC Clearinghouse.
17.
BjørnP.Boulus-RødjeN. (2018). Infrastructural inaccessibility: Tech entrepreneurs in occupied Palestine. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(5), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219777
CrenshawK. (1993). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.
20.
CresswellT. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment and Planning D, 28(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1068/d11407
21.
DingH.SavageG. (2013). Guest editors’ introduction: New directions in intercultural professional communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 22(1), 1–9.
EnnsC. Z.Comas-DíazL.Bryant-DavisT. (2021). Transnational feminist theory and practice: An introduction. Women & Therapy, 44(1–2), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02703149.2020.1774997
FraibergS. (2010). Composition 2.0: Toward a multilingual and multimodal framework. College Composition and Communication, 62(1), 100–126. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc201011661
27.
FraibergS. (2018). Multilingual and multimodal practices at a global startup: Toward a spatial approach to language and literacy in professional contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 55–68.
28.
FraibergS. (2021). Unsettling start-up ecosystems: Geographies, mobilities, and transnational literacies in the Palestinian start-up ecosystem. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 35(2), 219–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920979997
29.
FraibergS.WangX.YouX. (2017). Inventing the world grant university: Chinese international students’ mobilities, literacies, and identities. Utah State University Press.
30.
Glick SchillerN.SalazarN. B. (2013). Regimes of mobility across the globe. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(2), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2013.723253
31.
GrewalI.KaplanC. (1994). Scattered hegemonies: Postmodernity and transnational feminist practices. University of Minnesota Press.
32.
GuarnizoL. E. (1997). The emergence of a transnational social formation and the mirage of return migration among dominican transmigrants. Identities, 4(2), 281–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.1997.9962591
33.
HaasA. M. (2012). Race, rhetoric, and technology: A case study of decolonial technical communication theory, methodology, and pedagogy. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 26(3), 277-310.
JamaliD. (2009). Constraints and opportunities facing women entrepreneurs in developing countries. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 24(4), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542410910961532
LatourB. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
38.
LeanderK. M.PhillipsN. C.TaylorK. H. (2010). The changing social spaces of learning: Mapping new mobilities. Review of Research in Education, 34(1), 329–394. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X09358129
39.
LemkeJ. L. (2000). Across the scales of time: Artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327884MCA0704_03
40.
LevittP.SchillerN. G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7379.2004.tb00227.x
Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics. (2023). Performance of the Palestinian economy, 2023. http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/
47.
PennycookA.OtsujiE. (2014). Metrolingual multitasking and spatial repertoires: ‘Pizza mo two minutes coming.’Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 161–184.
48.
PriorP. (1998). Writing/disciplinarity: A sociohistoric account of literate activity in the academy. Routledge.
RussellD. R. (1997). Rethinking genre in school and society: An activity theory analysis. Written Communication, 14(4), 504–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088397014004004
SpinuzziC. (2008). Network: Theorizing knowledge work in telecommunications. MIT Press.
55.
SpinuzziC. (2011). Losing by expanding: Corralling the runaway object. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 25(4), 449–486. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651911411040
SpinuzziC. (2023). Actor/activity. In YuH.BuehlJ. (Eds.), Keywords in technical and professional communication (pp. 36–43). WAC Clearinghouse; University Press of Colorado.
58.
SpinuzziC. (2025). Triangles and tribulations: Translations, betrayals, and the making of cultural-historical activity theory. MIT Press.
59.
SpinuzziC.GuileD. (2019). Fourth-generation activity theory: An integrative literature review and implications for professional communication [Conference session]. 2019 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm) (pp. 37–45), Aachen, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm.2019.00012
60.
SunH. (2020). Global social media design: Bridging differences across cultures. Oxford University Press.
61.
TsingA. L. (2005). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.
62.
United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA). (2024). Occupied Palestinian Territory (oPt): Humanitarian needs and response update. https://www.ochaopt.org/
