This article introduces an assignment that uses key messages to introduce students to the different ways that rhetoric is used in professional writing. In particular, this article discusses how analyzing and writing reports about organizational web sites can help students perceive the rhetorical nature of professional communication, gain familiarity with several professional writing genres and writing conventions, become more critical readers, and recognize the relationship between an initial study and a report that communicates the findings from that study.
Anderson, P. ( 2011). Technical communication: A reader-centered approach (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
2.
Anson, C.M., & Forsberg, L.L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 7, 200-231.
3.
Bazerman, C. ( 1998). Editor s introduction. In J. Petraglia. Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education (pp. ix-x). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Bean, J.C. ( 1996). Engaging ideas: The professor’s guide to integrating writing, critical thinking, and active learning in the classroom. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Beaufort, A. ( 1999). Writing in the real world: Making the transition from school to work. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
6.
Carrithers, D., & Bean, J.C. ( 2008). Using a client memo to assess critical thinking of finance majors. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 10-26.
7.
Dannels, D.P. ( 2000). Learning to be professional: Technical classroom discourse, practice, and professional identity construction. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 5-37.
Dewhurst, S., & FitzPatrick, L. (2006). Making key messages memorable . Strategic Communication Management, 10, 6-7.
10.
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P., & Paré, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
11.
Doheny-Farina, S. ( 1992). Rhetoric, innovation, technology: Case studies of technical communication in technology transfers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
Esrock, S.L., & Leichty, G.B. ( 1999). Corporate World Wide Web pages: Serving the news media and other publics. Journalism & Mass Communications Quarterly , 76, 456-467.
13.
Freedman, A. ( 1993). Show and tell? The role of explicit teaching in the learning of new genres. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 222-251.
14.
Freedman, A., & Adam, C. ( 1996). Learning to write professionally: ‘‘Situated learning’’ and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 10, 395-427.
15.
Freedman, A., Adam, C., & Smart, G. ( 1994). Wearing suits to class: Simulating genres and simulations as genre. Written Communication, 11, 193-226.
16.
Johnson-Sheehan, R. ( 2010). Technical communication today (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
17.
Joliffe, D.A. ( 1994). The myth of transcendence and the problem of the ‘‘ethics’’ essay in writing instruction. In P. A. Sullivan & D. J. Qualley (Eds.), Pedagogy in the age of politics: Writing and reading (in) the academy (pp. 183-194). Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English .
18.
Mabrito, M. ( 1999). From workplace to classroom: Teaching professional writing . Business Communication Quarterly, 62, 101-105.
19.
Markel, M. ( 2010). Technical communication (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Bedford/ St. Martin’s.
20.
Oliu, W.E., Brusaw, C.T., & Alred, G.J. ( 2010). Writing that works: Communicating effectively on the job (10th ed.). Boston, MA : Bedford/St. Martin’s .
21.
Petraglia, J. ( 1998). Reality by design: The rhetoric and technology of authenticity in education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
22.
Pratt, C. ( 2004). Crafting key messages and talking points-or grounding them in what research tells us. Public Relations Quarterly , 49, 15-20.
23.
Schneider, B., & Andre, J. ( 2005). University preparation for workplace writing: An exploratory study of the perceptions of students in three disciplines. Journal of Business Communication, 42, 195-218.
24.
Shea, G.F. ( 1992). A case for clear writing. Training and Development, 46, 63-66.
25.
Spilka, R. ( 1993). Influencing workplace practice: A challenge for professional writing specialists in academia. In R. Spilka (Ed.), Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives (pp. 207-219). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
26.
Wickliff, G.A. ( 1997). Assessing the value of client-based group projects in an introductory technical communication course. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11, 170-191.
27.
Winsor, D.A. ( 1996). Writing like an engineer: A rhetorical education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
Yu, H. ( 2008). Contextualize technical writing assessment to better prepare students for workplace writing: Student-centered assessment instruments . Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 38, 265-284.
