This article examines rhetorical patterns in claim letters from two universities, one in China and one in the United States, to see whether these patterns are convergent. A genre-based textual analysis of the claim letters, written by two different cultural groups of participants, found that both groups of letters display a similar rhetorical preference for directness and indirectness. The author explores how local contextual factors have contributed to these groups of participants’ preference for similar rhetorical patterns and calls for the integration of contextual factors in intercultural rhetoric research, practice, and pedagogy.
Atkinson, D. ( 2008, June). Indigenous language practices: An exploration in intercultural rhetoric. Paper presented at the Fourth Conference on Intercultural Rhetoric and Discourse, Indianapolis, IN.
2.
Barnum, C.M., & Li, H. ( 2006). Chinese and American technical communication: A cross-cultural comparison of differences. Technical communication, 53, 143-166.
3.
Beamer, L. ( 1994). Teaching English business writing to Chinese-speaking business students. Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 57, 12-18.
4.
Beamer, L. ( 2003). Directness in Chinese business correspondence of the nineteenth century. Journal of Business and Technical Communication , 17, 201-237.
5.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. ( 1987). Investing cross-cultural pragmatics: An introductory overview. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 1-34). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
6.
Campbell, C.P. ( 1998). A bridge between high-context and low-context cultures? In S. Miemeier, C. P. Campbell & R. Dirven (Eds.), The cultural context in business communication (pp. 31-48). Amsterdam : Benjamins.
7.
Connor, U. ( 2004). Intercultural rhetoric research: Beyond texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 3, 291-304.
8.
Connor, U. ( 2008). Mapping multidimensional aspects of research: Reaching to intercultural rhetoric. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric (pp. 299-315). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
9.
Ding, D.D. ( 2006). An indirect style in business communication. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 20, 87-100.
10.
Dragga, S. ( 1999). Ethical intercultural technical communication: Looking through the lens of Confucian ethics. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 365-381.
11.
Ehninger, D. ( 1983). On systems of rhetoric. In J. L. Golden, G. F. Berquist, W. E. Coleman & J. M. Sproule (Eds.), The rhetoric of Western thought (pp. 25-33). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt.
12.
Ewald, H.R., & Burnett, R.E. ( 1997). Business communication. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
Gerritsen, M., & Wannet, E. ( 2005). Cultural differences in the appreciation of introductions of presentations. Technical Communication, 52, 194-208.
14.
Guffey, M.E. ( 1997). Business communication: Process and product (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
Hall, M., De Jong, M., & Steehouder, M. (2004). Cultural differences and usability evaluation: Individualistic and collectivistic participants compared . Technical Communication, 51, 489-503.
17.
Kaplan, R. ( 1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education . Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
18.
Liu, Y. ( 2007). Rhetorical organization in contemporary Chinese and English argumentation: A contrastive and comparative study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation , Texas Tech University, Lubbock .
19.
Longaker, M.G. ( 2006). Back to basics: An apology for economism in technical writing scholarship. Technical Communication Quarterly, 15, 9-29.
20.
Markel, M. ( 2004). Technical communication (7th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin ’s.
21.
Matsuda, P.K., & Atkinson, D. ( 2008). A conversation on contrastive rhetoric. In U. Connor, E. Nagelhout & W. Rozycki (Eds.), Contrastive rhetoric: Reaching into intercultural rhetoric (pp. 277-298). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
22.
Mikelonis, V.M. ( 2000). Message sent versus message received: Implications for designing training materials for Central and Eastern Europeans. In P. Hager & H. J. Scheiber (Eds.), Managing global communication in science and technology (pp. 205-231). New York: Wiley .
23.
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. ( 1995). Intercultural communication: A discourse approach. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
24.
Tebeaux, E., & Driskill, L. ( 1997). Culture and the shape of rhetoric: Protocols of international document design. In C. R. Lovitt & D. Goswami (Eds.), Exploring the rhetoric of international professional communication (pp. 211-252). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
25.
Ulijn, J. M. (1996). Translating the culture of technical documents: Some experimental evidence. In D. C. Andrews (Ed.), International dimensions of technical communication (pp. 69-86). Arlington, VA : Society for Technical Communication.
26.
Ulijn, J.M., & St.Amant, K. ( 2000). Mutual intercultural perception: How does it affect technical communication? Some data from China, the Netherlands, Germany, France, and Italy. Technical Communication, 47, 220-237.
27.
Wang, J. ( 2007). Linking contextual factors with rhetorical patterns in Chinese and American business letters: Moving toward convergence? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock.
28.
Xu, Q., & Zhu, C. ( 2000). English business correspondence. Shenyang, China: University of Northeast Press.
29.
Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W.J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication: A structurational approach to studying communication and media . Academy of Management Review, 17, 299-326.
30.
Zhang, Y. ( 1995a). Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp. 69-118). Manoa: University of Hawaii.
31.
Zhang, Y. ( 1995b). Strategies in Chinese requesting. In G. Kasper (Ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as native and target language (pp. 23-68). Manoa: University of Hawaii.
32.
Zhu, Y. ( 1999). Business communication in China. Commack, NY: Nova Science.
33.
Zhu, Y. ( 2005). Written communication across cultures: A sociocognitive perspective on business genres. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
