Research suggests that book reviews in academic journals tend to be positive but that readers prefer book reviews that include negative and positive evaluation. In this study, the author examines 48 books reviews from three business communication journals to determine whether these reviews are mainly positive. She counts compliments and criticisms, analyzing their location and topics. She also analyzes the force of the criticisms and strategies that reviewers use to mitigate criticism.
Beard, J. D., & Williams, D. L. (1993). A professional profile of business communication educators and their research preferences: Survey results. Journal of Business Communication, 30, 269-295.
2.
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). The CCSARP coding manual. In S. Blum-Kulka, J. House, & G. Kasper (Eds.), Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies (pp. 273-294). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language use. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Campbell, K. S., White, C. D., & Johnson, D. E. (2003). Leader-member relations as a function of rapport management. Journal of Business Communication, 40, 170-194.
5.
Cherry, R. D. (1988). Politeness in written persuasion. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 63-81.
6.
Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 315-337.
7.
Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155-182.
8.
Gordon, J., & Woods-Gordon, K. (2005, February 9). Up for tenure together [Electronic version]. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/2005/02/2005020901c.htm
9.
Graham, M. B., & Thralls, C. (1998). Connections and fissures: Discipline formation in business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 35, 7-13.
10.
Greene, R. J., & Spornick, C. D. (1995). Favorable and unfavorable book reviews: A quantitative study. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 21, 449-453.
11.
Hagge, J., & Kostelnick, C. (1989). Linguistic politeness in professional prose: A discourse analysis of auditors’ suggestion letters, with implications for business communication pedagogy. Written Communication, 6, 312-339.
12.
Haswell, R. H., Briggs, T. L., Fay, J. A., Gillen, N. K., Harrill, R., Shupala, A. M., et al. (1999). Context and rhetorical reading strategies: Haas and Flower (1988) revisited. Written Communication, 16, 3-27.
13.
Henry, A. (1995). Raising awareness of politeness in business writing. Language Awareness, 4, 179-188.
14.
Hobbs, P. (2003). The medium is the message: Politeness strategies in men’s and women’s voice mail messages. Journal of Pragmatics, 35, 243-262.
15.
Holmes, J. (1988). Paying compliments: A sex-preferential politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 445-465.
16.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
17.
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). “Sugaring the pill”: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 185-212.
18.
Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. Harlow, UK: Longman.
19.
Jablin, F. M., & Krone, K. (1984). Characteristics of rejection letters and their effects on job applicants. Written Communication, 1, 387-406.
20.
Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (1992). Complimenting and involvement in peer reviews: Gender variation. Language in Society, 21, 27-57.
21.
Locker, K. O. (1999). Factors in reader responses to negative letters: Experimental evidence for changing what we teach. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 13, 5-48.
22.
Mackiewicz, J., & Riley, K. (2003). The technical editor as diplomat: Linguistic strategies for balancing clarity and politeness. Technical Communication, 50, 83-94.
23.
Maier, P. (1992). Politeness strategies in business letters by native and non-native English speakers. English for Specific Purposes, 11, 189-205.
24.
Merritt, L. C. (1958). Pattern of modern book reviewing. In L. C. Merritt, M. Boaz, & K. S. Tisdale (Eds.), Reviews in library book selection. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
25.
Motta-Roth, D. (1996, March). Investigating connections between text and discourse communities: A cross-disciplinary study of evaluative discourse practices in academic book reviews. Paper presented at the 18th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics, Chicago. (EDRS Document No. 404 855)
26.
Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1-35.
27.
Reinsch, N. L., Jr., & Reinsch, J. W. (1996). Some assessments of business communication scholarship from social science citations. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 28-47.
28.
Riley, K., & Mackiewicz, J. (2003). Resolving the directness dilemma in document review sessions with non-native speakers. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 46, 1-16.
29.
Sage Publications. (2005a). Business Communication Quarterly. Retrieved January 13, 2006, from www.sagepub.com/journal.aspx?pid=9846
30.
Sage Publications. (2005b). Journal of Business Communication. Retrieved January 13, 2006, from www.sagepub.com/journals/00219436.htm
31.
Sage Publications. (2005c). Journal of Business and Technical Communication: Aims and scope. Retrieved January 13, 2006, from www.sagepub.com/journalScope.aspx?pid=48&sc=1
32.
Salerno, D. (1988). An interpersonal approach to writing negative messages. Journal of Business Communication, 25, 41-51.
33.
Sampson, G. (2005). Quantifying the shift towards empirical methods. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 10, 15-36.
34.
Smith, E. O. (2000). Strength in the technical communication journals and diversity in the serials cited. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 14, 131-184.
35.
Smith, S. (1997). The genre of the end comment: Conventions in teacher responses to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 48, 249-268.
36.
Snowe, L. (2004, October 13). Why do I do this? [Electronic version]. Chronicle of Higher Education. Retrieved January 16, 2006, from http://chronicle.com/jobs/2004/10/2004101301c.htm
37.
Spink, A., Robins, D., & Schamber, L. (1998). Use of scholarly book reviews: Implications for electronic publishing and scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 364-374.
38.
Thonus, T. (1999). How to communicate politely and be a tutor, too: NS-NNS interaction and writing center practice. Text, 19, 253-279.
39.
Wardrope, W. J. (2001). “Challenge” is a positive word: Embracing the interdisciplinary nature of business communication. Journal of Business Communication, 38, 242-247.
