As a response to research about both the work space of professional writers and the pedagogy using workplace simulations, a professional writing course was adapted for a high-tech conference room equipped with electronic meeting tools. This experiment improved students’ learning of course content, which included collaborative writing strategies, project management, and teamwork; research methods; presentation and design skills; and organizational culture and professional development. Students also better understood workplace realities and distinctions between academic and workplace environments. In addition, the experiment facilitated students’idea sharing and communication as well as their preparation for transitioning to the workplace. The teaching experience was more creative and rewarding, too.
Academic Innovations. (n.d.). Retrieved December 27, 2003, from www.academicinnovations.com
2.
Andrisani, D., Gaal, A. V., Gillette, D., & Steward, S. (2001). Making the most of interactivity online. Technical Communication, 48(3), 309-323.
3.
Anson, C. M., & Forsberg, L. L. (1990). Moving beyond the academic community: Transitional stages in professional writing. Written Communication, 47, 200-231.
4.
Baba, M. L. (1990). Local knowledge systems in advanced technology organizations. In L. R. Gomez-Mejia & M. W. Lawless (Eds.), Organizational issues in technology management (pp. 19-36). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
5.
Barber, J. F., & Grigar, D. (Eds.). (2001). New worlds, new words: Exploring pathways for writing about and in electronic environments. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
6.
Bateman, H. V., Goldman, S. R., Newbrough, R. H., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Students’ sense of community in constructivist/collaborative learning environments. In M. A. Gernsbacher & S. J. Derry (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twentieth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 126-131). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
Classroom, Inc. (n.d.). Retrieved December 27, 2003, from www.classroominc.org
8.
David, C., & Kienzler, D. (1999). Toward an emancipatory pedagogy in service courses and user departments. Technical Communication Quarterly, 8, 269-283.
9.
Day, M., & Batson, T. (1995). The network-based writing classroom: The ENFI idea. In M. Collins & Z. Berge (Eds.), Computer-mediated communication and the online writing classroom (Vol. 2, pp. 25-46). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
10.
Eyman, D. (1996). Hypertext and/as collaboration in the computer-facilitated writing classroom. Kairos: A Journal for Teachers of Writing in Webbed Environments, 1(2). Retrieved December 27, 2003, from http:%20//english.ttu.edu/kairos/1.2/binder.html?features/eyman/index.html
11.
Ferrari, M., Taylor, R., & VanLehn, K. (1999). Adapting work simulations for schools. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 21(1), 25-53.
12.
Freedman, A., & Adam, C. (1996). Learning to write professionally: “Situated learning” and the transition from university to professional discourse. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 10, 395-427.
13.
Gerrard, L. (2002). Electronic writing spaces. In I. L. Clark (Ed.), Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing (pp. 481-508). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Graves, P. R., & Noll, C. L. (1999). Collaborating using conferencing software. Delta Pi Epsilon Journal, 41, 1-13.
15.
Jeong, H., Taylor, R., & Chi, M. T. H. (2000). Learning from a computer workplace simulation. In L. R. Gleitman & A. K. Joshi (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 705-710). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16.
Kalmbach, J. (1997). Computer-supported classrooms and curricular change in technical communication programs. In S. A. Selber (Ed.), Computers and technical communication: Pedagogical and programmaticperspectives (pp. 261-274). Westport, CT: Ablex.
17.
Lewis, J. S. (1989). Adaptation: Businesswriting as a catalystin a liberal arts curriculum. In C. B. Matalene (Ed.), Worlds of writing: Teaching and learning in discourse communities of work (pp. 83-92). New York: Random House.
18.
Myers, L. (1993). Approaches to computer writing classrooms: Learning from practical experience. Albany: State University of New York.
19.
Ornatowski, C. M. (1995). The writing consultant and the corporate/industry culture: How to learn the lingo, mind-set, andissues. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 9, 446-460.
20.
Paradis, J., Dobrin, D., & Miller, R. (1985). Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R & D organization. In L. Odell & D. Goswami (Eds.), Writing in nonacademic settings (pp. 281-307). New York: Guilford.
21.
Rehling, L. (1994). “Is it theirs, mine, or ours?” Ownership, collaboration, and cultures. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 37, 42-49.
22.
South-Western Thomson Learning. (n.d.). Scan 2000. Retrieved December 27, 2003, from http:%20//www.scans2000.swep.com
23.
Strickland, J. (1997). From disk to hard copy: Teaching writing with computers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
24.
Tucker, M. L., Meyer, G. D., & Westerman, J. W. (1996). Organizational communication: Development of internal strategic competitive advantage. Journal of Business Communication, 33, 51-69.
25.
Tullar, W. L., Kaiser, P. R., & Balthazard, P. A. (1998). Group work and electronic meeting systems: From boardroom to classroom. Business Communication Quarterly, 61(4), 53-65.
