This article provides a cultural-historical analysis of dictation as a composing method in Western history. Drawing on Ong’s concept of secondary orality, the analysis shows how dictation’s shifting role as a form of literacy has been influenced by the dual mediation of technological tools and existing cultural practices. At the dawn of modernism, a series of technological, economic, and philosophical factors converged to promote silent forms of individual authorship over collaborative modes of dictation favored in late antiquity and the Middle Ages. Similar changes are taking place today and may help reverse the dominance of silent authorship. If voice-recognition technologies continue to improve in the future, they may help professional communicators bridge the spoken and textual realms and effect changes in our attitudes toward authorship and orality.
Al-Aynati, M. M., & Chorneyko, K. A. (2003). Comparison of voice-automated transcription and human transcription in generating pathology reports. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 127, 721-725.
2.
Antiles, S., Couris, J., Schweitzer, A., Rosenthal, D., & Da Silva, R. Q. (2000). Project planning, training, measurement and sustainment: The successful implementation of voice recognition. Radiology Management, 22, 18-31.
3.
Baron, N. S. (2000). Alphabet to email: How written English evolved and where it’s heading. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.
4.
Barthes, R. (1977). The death of the author. In S. Heath (Ed.), Image, music, text (pp. 142-148). New York: Hill and Wang.
5.
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. New York: Cambridge University Press.
6.
Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
8.
Burnyeat, M. F. (1997). Postscript on silent reading. Classical Quarterly, 47, 74-76.
9.
Camargo, M. (1988). Toward a comprehensive art of written discourse: Geoffrey of Vinsaul and the ars dictaminis. Rhetorica, 6, 167-194.
10.
Camargo, M. (1995). Between grammar and rhetoric: Composition teaching at Oxford and Bologna in the late Middle Ages. In W. B. Horner (Ed.), Rhetoric and pedagogy: Its history and practice (pp. 83-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Carruthers, M. J. (1990). The book of memory: A study of memory in medieval culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Chafe, W. L. (1985). Linguistic differences produced by differences between speaking and writing. In D. R. Olson, N. Torrance, & A. Hildyard (Eds.), Literacy, language, and learning (pp. 105-123). London: Cambridge University Press.
13.
Cicero. (1978). Cicero’s letters to his friends (Vol. 2, D. R. S. Bailey, Trans.). New York: Penguin.
14.
Clanchy, M. T. (1979). From memory to written record: England 1066-1307. London: Arnold.
15.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
16.
Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 1-46). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
Crowley, S. (1990). The methodical memory: Invention in current-traditional rhetoric. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18.
Crowley, S. (1993). Modern rhetoric and memory. In J. F. Reynolds (Ed.), Rhetorical memory and delivery: Classical concepts for contemporary composition and communication (pp. 31-44). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
19.
Davies, M. W. (1982). Woman’s place is at the typewriter: Office work and office workers 1870-1930. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
20.
Edel, L. (1969). The life of Henry James: The master (1901-1916). New York: Avon.
21.
Fine, L. M. (1990). The souls of the skyscraper: Female clerical workers in Chicago, 1870-1930. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
22.
Foucault, M. (1979). What is an author? In J. V. Harari (Ed.), Textual strategies: Perspectives in post-structuralist criticism (pp. 141-160). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
23.
Gavrilov, A. K. (1997). Techniques of reading in classical antiquity. Classical Quarterly, 47, 56-73.
24.
Goody, J. (1987). The interface between the written and the oral. New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
Haas, C. (1999). On the relationship between old and new technologies. Computers and Composition, 16, 209-228.
26.
Honeycutt, L. (2004). The role of planning in writing with voice recognition software. Unpublished manuscript.
27.
Janko, R. (1998). The Homeric poems as dictated texts. Classical Quarterly, 48, 1-13.
28.
Jaszi, P. (1994). On the author effect: Contemporary copyright and collective creativity. In M. Woodmansee & P. Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp. 29-56). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
Karat, C., Halverson, C., Horn, D., & Karat, J. (1999). Patterns of error and correction in large vocabulary continuous speech recognition systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 568-575). Pittsburgh: ACM Press.
30.
Kirk, G. S. (1976). Homer and the oral tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31.
Knox, B. M. W. (1968). Silent reading in antiquity. Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, 9, 421-435.
32.
Lewis, J. (1999, April/May). How to kill your keyboard. Civilization, 6, 84-87.
33.
Lubar, S. (1993). Infoculture: The Smithsonian book of information age inventions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
34.
Lunsford, A., & Ede, L. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors: Perspectives on collaborative writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
35.
Lupton, E. (1993). Mechanical brides: Women and machines from home to office. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
36.
Morton, D. L., Jr. (2001). Men, women, and sound: The history of the office dictation machine. Retrieved May 27, 2003, from http://www.recording-history.org/HTML/men_women1.htm
37.
Murphy, J. J. (1974). Rhetoric in the Middle Ages: A history of rhetorical theory from Saint Augustine to the Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
38.
Ong, W. J. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York: Routledge Kegan Paul.
39.
Patt, W. D. (1978). The early ars dictaminis as response to a changing society. Viator, 9, 133-155.
40.
Petrucci, A. (1995). Writers and readers in medieval Italy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
41.
Pitman, I. (1891). A history of shorthand (3rd ed.). London: Pitman & Sons.
42.
Plutarch. (1999). Roman lives: A selection of eight Roman lives (R. Waterfield, Trans.) Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
Quintilian. (1903). Institutes of oratory: Or, education of an orator (Vol. 2, J. S. Watson, Trans.). London: Bell and Sons.
44.
Reece, J. E., & Cumming, G. (1996). Evaluating speech-based composition methods: Planning, dictation, and the listening word processor. In C. M. Levy & S. E. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 361-380). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
45.
Rehr, D. (n.d.). It’s the machine dictators love. Yesterday’s office. Retrieved March 2, 2003, from http://www.yesterdaysoffice.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=ShowArticle&articleid=3
46.
Saenger, P. (1982). Silent reading: Its impact on late medieval script and society. Viator, 13, 367-414.
47.
Saenger, P. (1997). Space between words: The origins of silent reading. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
48.
Scribner, S., & Beach, K. (1993). An activity theory approach to memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 185-190.
49.
Shneiderman, B. (2000). The limits of speech recognition. Communications of the ACM, 43(9), 63-65.
50.
Skeat, T. C. (1956). The use of dictation in ancient book production. Proceedings of the British Academy, 42, 179-208.
51.
Spooner, M. (1988). Dictating to the machine: Voice activated computer technology. English Education, 20, 109-115.
52.
Tannen, D. (1982). The oral/literate continuum in discourse. In D. Tannen (Ed.), Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy (pp. 1-16). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
53.
Tebeaux, E. (1983). Keeping technical writing relevant (or, how to become a dictator). College English, 45, 174-183.
54.
Tebeaux, E. (1997). The emergence of a tradition: Technical writing in the English Renaissance, 1475-1640. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
55.
Thomas, R. (1992). Literacy and orality in ancient Greece. New York: Cambridge University Press.
56.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 144-188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.
57.
Weber, J. (2003). Tomorrow’s transcription tools: What new technology means for healthcare. Journal of the American Health Information Management Association, 74, 39-43.
58.
Welch, K. E. (1999). Electric rhetoric: Classical rhetoric, oralism, and a new literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
59.
Woodmansee, M. (1994). On the author effect: Recovering collectivity. In M. Woodmansee & P. Jaszi (Eds.), The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature (pp. 15-28). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
60.
Yates, J. (1989). Control through communication: The rise of system in American management. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
61.
Zick, R. G., & Olsen, J. (2001). Voice recognition software versus a traditional transcription service for physician charting in the emergency department. American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 19, 295-298.
