Based on the assumption that prepubertal boys and girls do not differ with respect to larynx size, nor in size of the vocal cavities and, therefore, may be expected to have approximately the same fundamental and formant frequencies, an experiment was carried out in order to investigate whether listeners are still able to determine children's sex on the basis of a few speech samples. Sentences and to a somewhat smaller extent sustained vowels were categorized correctly on speakers' sex by a panel of normally sighted as well as visually handicapped listeners. In addition, evidence is provided that attribution of perceptual labels to children's speech samples corroborates traditional notions about adult men's and women's voices.
Bladon, R.A.W., Henton, C.G. and Pickering, J.B., (1984). Outline of an auditory theory of speaker normalization. In M.P.R. van den Broecke and A. Cohen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Xth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (pp. 313–317). Dordrecht: Foris.
2.
Boves, L., Fagel W. and Van Herpt, L., (1982). Opvattingen van vrouwen en mannen over de spraak van mannen en vrouwen. De Nieuwe Taalgids, 75–1, 1–23.
3.
Bresser, A. and Günzburger, D., (1985). Voice recognizability of prepubertal boys and girls. Progress Report Institute of Phonetics Utrecht, 10.2, 25–32.
4.
Burlingham, D., (1964). Hearing and its role in the development of the blind. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 19, 95–112.
5.
Coleman, R.O., (1971). Male and female voice quality and its relationship to vowel formant frequencies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 565–577.
6.
Coleman, R.O., (1976). A comparison of the contributions of two voice quality characteristics to the perception of maleness and femaleness in the voice. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 19, 168–180.
7.
Cooper, M., (1973). Modern Techniques of Vocal Rehabilitation. Springfield, Ill: Thomas.
8.
Fairbanks, G., (1966). Experimental Phonetics: Selected Articles. Urbana, Ill.
9.
Günzburger, D., (1984). Perception of some male-female voice characteristics. Progress Report Institute of Phonetics Utrecht, 9.2, 15–26.
10.
Hunter, W.S. and Garn, S., (1972). Disproportionate sexual dimorphism in the human face. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36, 133–138.
11.
Jastrzembska, Z.F., (1976). The Effects of Blindness and Other Impairments on Early Development. New York: American Foundation of the Blind.
12.
Kirchner, J.A., (1970). Physiology of the Larynx. Rochester, Minn.
13.
Linke, C.E., (1973). A study of pitch characteristics of female voices and their relationship to vocal effectiveness. Folia Phoniatrica, 25, 17–85.
14.
Loveday, L., (1981). Pitch, politeness and sexual role: An exploratory investigation into the pitch correlates of English and Japanese politeness formulae. Language and Speech, 24, 71–89.
15.
Luchsinger, R. and Arnold, G., (1965). Voice — Speech — Language. London: Constable.
16.
Mattingly, I., (1966). Speaker variation and vocal tract size. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 1219(abstract).
17.
Plomp, R. and Mimpen, A.M., (1979). Improving the reliability of testing the speech-reception threshold for sentences. Audiology, 18, 43–52.
18.
Romaine, S., (1978). Postvocalic /r/ in Scottish English: Sound change in progress? In P. Trudgill, (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English (pp. 144–157). London: Arnold.
19.
Sachs, J., Lieberman P. and Erickson, D., (1973). Anatomical and cultural determinants of male and female speech. In R.W. Shuy and R.W. Fasold, (Eds.), Language Attitudes: Current Trends and Prospects, Washington, D.C.: Georgetown Univ.
20.
Taylor, W., (1973). Disorders of Auditory Function. London: Academic.
21.
ter Keurs, M. and Günzburger, D., (1986). Voice identification and description by visually handicapped subjects. Progress Report Institute of Phonetics Utrecht, 11.2, 3–10.
22.
Tuomi, S.K. and Fischer, J., (1979). Characteristics of simulated sexy voice. Folia Phoniatrica, 31, 242–249.
23.
Van Riper, C., (1982). The Nature of Stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
24.
Walker, G.F. and Kowalski, C.J., (1972). On the growth of the mandible. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 36, 111–118.
