Background: High-quality goals of care (GOC) discussions should be founded on shared decision-making (SDM) - eliciting patients’ values and preferences while providing adequate information for patients to make decisions. One metric that can assess GOC discussion quality is the degree to which patients are adequately informed. Objective: Identify clinician GOC discussion attitudes and behaviors associated with clinician confidence that they conveyed adequate information to patients. Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of national survey data from Veterans Affairs clinicians assessing attitudes toward and behaviors during GOC discussions about life-sustaining therapy. We used stepwise multivariable logistic regression models to identify factors associated with clinician confidence that they provided patients with adequate information to make informed decisions following discussions. Results: Among the 253 clinician respondents, there was high confidence that they provided adequate information (Mean = 4.09 on a 5-point scale, SD = 0.69, Median = 4.0). Higher confidence was associated with practicing in Geriatrics/Palliative Care in bivariate analyses, but not when controlling for clinician behaviors during GOC discussions. In the final multivariable model, two behaviors were statistically significantly associated with increased confidence: “identify proxy/surrogate” (β = 0.21, P = 0.015) and “suggest decision consistent with patients’ values” (β = 0.16, P = 0.045). These behaviors also occurred significantly more often in Geriatrics/Palliative Care compared to other specialties. Conclusion: Specific clinician behaviors in GOC discussions differed across specialties and were significantly associated with clinicians’ confidence that they conveyed adequate information. Our findings can inform strategies to enhance communication training across specialties and improve care processes to support clinicians in performing behaviors conducive to high-quality GOC discussions.
BillingsJAKrakauerEL. On patient autonomy and physician responsibility in end-of-life care. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(9):849-853.
2.
ZhangBWrightAAHuskampHA, et al.Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med. 2009;23:480-488.
3.
EpsteinASRileyMNelsonJEBernalCMartinSXiaoH. Goals of care documentation by medical oncologists and oncology patient end-of-life care outcomes. Cancer. 2022;128(18):3400-3407.
4.
CurtisJRTreecePDNielsenEL, et al.Randomized trial of communication facilitators to reduce family distress and intensity of end-of-life care. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016;193(2):154-162.
5.
WhiteDBAngusDCShieldsAM, et al.A randomized trial of a family-support intervention in intensive care units. N Eng J Med. 2018;378(25):2365-2375.
6.
SoonJJYJuanDWKOngWS, et al.Implementation of a multi-disciplinary team and quality of goals of care discussions in palliative surgical oncology patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2023;30(13):8054-8060.
7.
JacobsenJBlindermanCColeCAJacksonV. “I’d recommend…” how to incorporate your recommendation into shared decision making for patients with serious illness. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2018;55(4):1223-1230.
8.
BernackiREBlockSDAmerican College of Physicians High Value Care Task Force. Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174(12):1994-2003.
9.
VolandesAEBrandeisGHDavisAD, et al.A randomized controlled trail of a goals-of-care video for elderly patients admitted to skilled nursing facilities. J Palliat Med. 2012;15(7):805-811.
10.
RhondaliWPerez-CruzPHuiD, et al.Patient-physician communication about code status preferences: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer. 2013;119(11):2067-2073.
MartinezKResnicowKWilliamsGC, et al.Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?Patient Educ Couns. 2016;99(12):1947-1954.
13.
JamesJTEakinsDJScullyRR. Informed consent, shared decision making, and a reasonable patient’s wishes based on a cross-sectional, national survey in the USA using a hypothetical scenario. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7):e028957.
14.
BurtJAbelGElliotMN, et al.The evaluation of physicians’ communication skills from multiple perspectives. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(4):330-337.
15.
WienerRSClarkJAKoppelmanE, et al.Patient vs clinician perspectives on communication about results of lung cancer screening: a qualitative study. Chest (Am Coll Chest Physicians). 2020;158(3):1240-1249.
16.
ParkJSahaSHanD, et al.Are clinicians’ self-reported empathic concern and perspective-taking traits associated with their response to patient emotions? Communication Studies. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(9):1745-1751.
17.
BrushDRRasinskiKAHallJBAlexanderGC. Recommendations to limit life support: a national survey of critical care physicians. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:633-639.
18.
BinderAFHuangGCBussMK. Uninformed consent: do medicine residents lack the proper framework for code status discussions?J Hosp Med. 2016;11:111-116.
19.
BrightonLJKoffmanJHawkinsA, et al.A systematic review of end-of-life care communication skills training for generalist palliative care providers: research quality and reporting guidance. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2017;54(3):417-425.
20.
PollakKIGaoXBeliveauJGriffithBKennedyDCasarettD. Pilot study to improve goals of care conversations among hospitalists. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2019;58(5):864-870.
21.
MaCRiehmLEBernackiRPaladinoJYouJJ. Quality of clinicians’ conversations with patients and families before and after implementation of the Serious Illness Care Program in a hospital setting: a retrospective chart review study. CMAJ Open. 2020;8(2):E448-E454.
22.
MahKSwamiNO’ConnorBHannonBRodinGZimmermannC. Early palliative intervention: effects on patient care satisfaction in advanced cancer. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022;12(2):218-225.
23.
SchramAWHoughamGWMeltzerDORuhnkeGW. Palliative care in critical care settings: a systematic review of communication-based competencies essential for patient and family satisfaction. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017;34(9):887-895.
24.
CurtisJRDowneyLBackAL, et al.Effect of a patient and clinician communication-priming intervention on patient-reported goals-of-care discussions between patients with serious illness and clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(7):930-940.
25.
HansonLCZimmermanSSongMK, et al.Effect of the goals of care intervention for advanced dementia: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(1):24-31.
26.
SepulvedaCMarlinAYoshidaYUllrichA. Palliative care: the world health organization’s global perspective. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2002;24(2):91-96.
27.
MomenNCBarclaySIG. Addressing ‘the elephant on the table’: barriers to end of life care conversations in heart failure – a literature review and narrative synthesis. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2011;5(4):312-316.
28.
PfeilTALaryionavaKReiter-TheilSHiddemannWWinklerEC. What keeps oncologists from addressing palliative care early on with incurable cancer patients? An active stance seems key. Oncologist. 2015;20(1):56-61.
29.
YouJJDownarJFowlerRA, et al.Barriers to goals of care discussions with seriously ill hospitalized patients and their families: a multicenter survey of clinicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(4):549-556.
30.
GeorgeNRKryworuchkoJHunoldKM, et al.Shared decision making to support the provision of palliative and end-of-life care in the emergency department: a consensus statement and research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2019;23(12):1394-1402.
31.
GrudzenCRStoneSCMorrisonRS. The palliative care model for emergency department patients with advanced illness. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(8):945-950.
32.
CaseyMFPriceLMarkwalterD, et al.Advance care planning for emergency department patients with COVID-19 infection: an assessment of a physician training program. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2022;39(11):1358-1363.
33.
QuillTEAbernethyAP. Generalist plus specialist palliative care—creating a more sustainable model. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(13):1173-1175.
34.
EdwardsANamS. Palliative care exposure in internal medicine residency education: a survey of ACGME internal medicine program directors. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018;35(1):41-44.
35.
EpsteinASDesaiAVBernalC, et al.Giving voice to patient values throughout cancer: a novel nurse-led intervention. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2019;58(1):72-79.
36.
EpsteinASKnezevicARomanoDR, et al.Patient portals to elicit essential patient-reported elements of communication supporting person-centered oncologic care: a pilot study of the PERSON approach. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2023;7:e2300125.
37.
DesaiAVMichaelCLKupermanGJ, et al.A novel patient values tab for the electronic health record: a user-centered design approach. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(2):e21615.
38.
BurtCWoodwellD. Tests of methods to improve response to physician surveys. 2006.
39.
De KoningREgizAKotechaJ, et al.Survey fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic: an analysis of neurosurgery survey response rates. Front Surg. 2021;8:690680.
40.
BidassieBKovachAValletteMA, et al.Breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention use among veterans Affairs primary care providers: a national online survey. Mil Med. 2020;185(3-4):512-518.
41.
ArigoDHookerSFunderburkJ, et al.Provider and staff perceptions of veterans’ attrition from a national primary care weight management program. Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2015;16(2):147-156.
42.
MartinezRNGordonEJTullyS, et al.A mixed-methods study of veterans Affairs providers’ experiences communicating with patients about the affordable care act. Mil Med. 2017;182(5):e1715-e1723.
43.
ApaydinEARoseDEMcCleanMR, et al.Association between care coordination tasks with non-VA community care and VA PCP burnout: an analysis of a national, cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):809.
44.
CypressBS. COVID-19: the economic impact of a pandemic on the healthcare delivery system in the United States. Nurs Forum. 2022;57(2):323-327.
45.
ChudasamaYVGilliesCLZaccardiF, et al.Impact of COVID-19 on routine care for chronic disease: a global survey of views from healthcare professionals. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(5):965-967.
46.
MoynihanRSandersSMichaleffZA, et al.Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of healthcare services: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e045343.
