The aim of this paper is to provide foundational work to standardize the conceptual definition of what I refer to as symptom invalidation by using invalidating environments and illness representations as guiding conceptual frameworks. Mixed deductive–inductive thematic analysis was used to analyze survey responses to an open-ended question gauging an invalidating interaction patients experienced with a clinician among 1038 patients with endometriosis. Dissimilarity in illness representations between patients and clinicians, as perceived by patients, occurred with feelings of invalidation. Invalidation was experienced in relationship to all identified domains of illness representations including how clinicians communicated the diagnosis (identity label), the internal (internal cause) and/or external (external cause) nature of the cause, clinicians’ understanding of the timeline (timeline) and consequences (consequences), and clinicians’ understanding of control over the symptoms via the efficacy of patients (self-efficacy) and coping procedures (response efficacy). Inductive analysis revealed invalidation can also be related to how clinicians communicate judgments of whether patients are presenting with ulterior motives (secondary gains). Clinicians’ actions appear to compound experiences of invalidation by not having symptoms investigated (investigative experiences). Invalidating environments and illness representations serve as effective conceptual frameworks for providing a conceptual definition of symptom invalidation.
AliA.VitulanoL.LeeR.WeissT. R.ColsonE. R. (2014). Experiences of patients identifying with chronic Lyme disease in the healthcare system: A qualitative study. BMC Family Practice, 15, Article79. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-15-79
2.
ÅsbringP.NärvänenA. L. (2002). Women’s experiences of stigma in relation to chronic fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973230201200202
3.
BallardK. D.LowtonK.WrightJ. T. (2006). What’s the delay? A qualitative study of women’s experiences of reaching a diagnosis of endometriosis. Fertility and Sterility, 86(5), 1296–1301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.054
4.
BerglundB.Anne-CathrineM.RandersI. (2010). Dignity not fully upheld when seeking health care: Experiences expressed by individuals suffering from Ehlers–Danlos syndrome. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903178407
5.
BontempoA. C. (2022). The need for a standardized conceptual term to describe invalidation of patient symptoms. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(9), 2104–2114. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211024718
6.
Braeuninger‐WeimerK.AnjarwallaN.PincusT. (2019). Discharged and dismissed: A qualitative study with back pain patients discharged without treatment from orthopaedic consultations. European Journal of Pain, 23(8), 1464–1474. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1412
BurkeM. J. (2019). “It’s all in your head”—Medicine’s silent epidemic. Journal of the American Medical Association Neurology, 76(12), 1417–1418. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3043
9.
ChauvetP.Guiguet-AuclairC.ComptourA.DenouëlA.GerbaudL.CanisM.BourdelN. (2018). Feelings and expectations in endometriosis: Analysis of open comments from a cohort of endometriosis patients. Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction, 47(7), 281–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2018.05.010
10.
Cohen SilverR. C.WortmanC. B.CroftonC. (1990). The role of coping in support provision: The self-presentational dilemma of victims of life crises. In SarasonB. R.SarasonI. G.PierceG. R. (Eds.), Social support: An interactional view (pp. 397–426). John Wiley & Sons.
11.
CoxH.HendersonL.AndersenN.CagliariniG.SkiC. (2003). Focus group study of endometriosis: Struggle, loss and the medical merry-go-round. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(1), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-172x.2003.00396.x
CoyneJ. C.WortmanC. B.LehmanD. R. (1988). The other side of support: Emotional overinvolvement and miscarried helping. In GottliebB. H. (Ed.), Marshaling social support: Formats, processes, and effects (pp. 305–330). Sage Publications, Inc.
DennyE. (2004b). ‘You are one of the unlucky ones’: Delay in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Diversity in Health and Social Care, 1, 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338725
16.
DennyE. (2009). “I never know from one day to another how I will feel”: Pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qualitative Health Research, 19(7), 985–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338725
17.
DennyE.MannC. H. (2008). Endometriosis and the primary care consultation. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 139(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.10.006
18.
DusenburyM. (2018). Doing harm: The truth about how bad medicine and lazy science leave women dismissed, misdiagnosed, and sick. HarperCollins Publishers.
19.
EpsteinR. M.HadeeT.CarrollJ.MeldrumS. C.LardnerJ.ShieldsC. G. (2007). “Could this be something serious?” Reassurance, uncertainty, and empathy in response to patients’ expressions of worry. Journal of General Internal Medine, 22(12), 1731–1739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0416-9
20.
EpsteinR. M.PetersE. (2009). Beyond information: Exploring patients’ preferences. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(2), 195–197. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.984
21.
EpsteinR. M.QuillT. E.McWhinneyI. R. (1999). Somatization reconsidered: Incorporating the patient’s experience of illness. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.159.3.215
22.
EpsteinR. M.StreetR. L.,Jr. (2007) Patient-centered communication in cancer care: Promoting healing and reducing suffering (NIH publication no. 07-6225). National Cancer Institute.
23.
FacchinF.SaitaE.BarbaraG.DridiD.VercelliniP. (2017). “Free butterflies will come out of these deep wounds”: A grounded theory of how endometriosis affects women’s psychological health. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(4), 538–549. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105316688952
24.
GoertzG. (2006). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton University Press.
25.
GroganS.TurleyE.ColeJ. (2018). ‘So many women suffer in silence’: A thematic analysis of women’s written accounts of coping with endometriosis. Psychology and Health, 33(11), 1364–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2018.1496252
26.
GrundströmH.AlehagenS.KjølhedeP.BerteröC. (2018). The double‐edged experience of healthcare encounters among women with endometriosis: A qualitative study. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 27(1-2), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13872
27.
GrundströmH.DanellH.SköldE.AlehagenS. (2020). “A protracted struggle” – A qualitative blog study of endometriosis healthcare experiences in Sweden. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 37(4), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.37464/2020.374.75
28.
HåkansonC.Sahlberg-BlomE.TernestedtB. M. (2010). Being in the patient position: Experiences of health care among people with irritable bowel syndrome. Qualitative Health Research, 20(8), 1116–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732310369914
29.
HallM. A.DuganE.ZhengB.MishraA. K. (2001). Trust in physicians and medical institutions: What is it, can it be measured, and does it matter?The Millbank Quarterly, 79(4), 613–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00223
30.
HållstamA.StålnackeB. M.SvensénC.LöfgrenM. (2018). Living with painful endometriosis—A struggle for coherence. A qualitative study. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 17, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2018.06.002
31.
HalversonC. M.PenwellH. L.FrancomanoC. A. (2023). Clinician-associated traumatization from difficult medical encounters: Results from a qualitative interview study on the Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes. SSM-Qualitative Research in Health, 3, Article 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmqr.2023.100237
32.
HeijmansM. J. W. M.RidderD. D.BensingJ. (1999). Dissimilarity in patients’ and spouses’ representations of chronic illness: Exploration of relations to patient adaptation. Psychology and Health, 14(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870449908407340
33.
HintzE. A. (2023). “It’s all in your head”: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research about disenfranchising talk experienced by female patients with chronic overlapping pain conditions. Health Communication, 38(11), 2501–2515. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2081046
International Working Group of AAGL, ESGE, ESHRE and WES, TomassettiC.JohnsonN. P.PetrozzaJ.AbraoM. S.EinarssonJ. I.HorneA. W.LeeT. T.MissmerS.VermeulenN.ZondervanK. T.GrimbizisG.De WildeR. L. (2021). An international terminology for endometriosis. Human Reproduction Open, 2021(4), Article hoab029. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab029
36.
JacksonJ. L. (2005). Communication about symptoms in primary care: Impact on patient outcomes. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 11(Suppl 1), S51–S56. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2005.11.s-51
37.
JonesG.JenkinsonC.KennedyS. (2004). The impact of endometriosis upon quality of life: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 25(2), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820400002279
KnoopI.DunwoodyL. (2022). “You’re always fighting”: The lived experience of people with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS). Disability and Rehabilitation, 45(10), 1629–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2022.2071482
41.
KoolM. B.van MiddendorpH.BoeijeH. R.GeenenR. (2009). Understanding the lack of understanding: Invalidation from the perspective of the patient with fibromyalgia. Arthritis Care and Research, 61(12), 1650–1656. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24922
42.
KoolM. B.van MiddendorpH.LumleyM. A.SchenkY.JacobsJ. W. G.BijlsmaJ. W. J.GeenenR. (2010). Lack of understanding in fibromyalgia and rheumatoid arthritis: The Illness Invalidation Inventory (3* I). Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 69(11), 1990–1995. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2009.123224
43.
KornelsenJ.AtkinsC.BrownellK.WoollardR. (2016). The meaning of patient experiences of medically unexplained physical symptoms. Qualitative Health Research, 26(3), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314566326
44.
KrebsE.SchoenbauerK. V. (2019). Hysterics and heresy: Using dialogism to explore the problematics of endometriosis diagnosis. Health Communication, 35(8), 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1606136
45.
LaDonnaK. A.TaylorT.LingardL. (2018). Why open-ended survey questions are unlikely to support rigorous qualitative insights. Academic Medicine, 93(3), 347–349. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002088
LeenersB.DamasoF.Ochsenbein-KölbleN.FarquharC. (2018). The effect of pregnancy on endometriosis—Facts or fiction?Human Reproduction Update, 24(3), 290–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmy004
48.
LeventhalH.BenyaminiY.BrownleeS.DiefenbachM.LeventhalE. A.Patrick-MillerL.RobitailleC. (1997). Illness representations: Theoretical foundations. In WeinmanJ.PetrieK. (Eds.), Perceptions of health and illness (pp. 19–46). Harwood Publishers.
49.
LeventhalH.LeventhalE. A.van NguyenT. (1985). Reactions of families to illness: Theoretical models and perspectives. In TurkD. C.KernsR. D. (Eds.), Health, illness and families - A life-span perspective (pp. 108–147). John Wiley & Sons.
50.
LeventhalH.MeyerD.NerenzD. R. (1980). The common sense representation of illness danger. In RachmanS. (Ed.), Medical psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–252). Pergamon Press.
51.
LeventhalH.NerenzD. R.SteeleD. J. (1984). Illness representations and coping with health threats. In RachmanS. (Ed.), Handbook of psychology and health (Vol. 4, pp. 219–252). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003044307-9
52.
LightbourneA.FoleyS.DempseyM.CroninM. (2023). Living with endometriosis: A reflexive thematic analysis examining women’s experiences with the Irish healthcare services. Qualitative Health Research, 34(4), 311–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323231214114
53.
LinehanM. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment for borderline personality disorder. Guilford Press.
54.
LoftM. I.FogedE. M.KoreskaM. (2022). An unexpected journey: The lived experiences of patients with long-term cognitive sequelae after recovering from COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research, 32(8-9), 1356–1369. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221099467
55.
MandersonL.WarrenN.MarkovicM. (2008). Circuit breaking: Pathways of treatment seeking for women with endometriosis in Australia. Qualitative Health Research, 18(4), 522–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732308315432
56.
Matías-GonzálezY.Sánchez-GalarzaA. N.Flores-CalderaI.Rivera-SegarraE. (2021). “Es que tú eres una changa”: Stigma experiences among Latina women living with endometriosis. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 42(1), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2020.1822807
57.
McLeodJ. M.PanZ. (2005). Concept explication and theory construction. In DunwoodyS.BeckerL. B.McLeodD. M.KosickiG. M. (Eds.), The evolution of key mass communication concepts (pp. 13–76). Hampton Press, Inc.
MikesellL.BontempoA. C. (2023). Healthcare providers’ impact on the care experiences of patients with endometriosis: The value of trust. Health Communication, 38(10), 1981–1993. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2048468
60.
Moss-MorrisR.WeinmanJ.PetrieK.HorneR.CameronL.BuickD. (2002). The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychology and Health, 17(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440290001494
61.
MurrayS. L.HolmesJ. G. (1997). A leap of faith? Positive illusions in romantic relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(6), 586–604. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297236003
62.
NettletonS. (2006). ‘I just want permission to be ill’: Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms. Social Science and Medicine, 62(5), 1167–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.07.030
63.
Ramin-WrightA.SchwartzA. S. K.GeraedtsK.RauchfussM.WölflerM. M.HaeberlinF.von OrelliS.EberhardM.ImthurnB.ImeschP.FinkD.LeenersB. (2018). Fatigue—A symptom in endometriosis. Human Reproduction, 33(8), 1459–1465. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey115
64.
RoweH. J.HammarbergK.DwyerS.CamilleriR.FisherJ. R. (2019). Improving clinical care for women with endometriosis: Qualitative analysis of women’s and health professionals’ views. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology, 42(3), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2019.1678022
65.
SchuttR. K. (2019). Investigating the social world: The process and practice of research. Sage Publications.
66.
ShafrirA. L.FarlandL. V.ShahD. K.HarrisH. R.KvaskoffM.ZondervanK.MissmerS. A. (2018). Risk for and consequences of endometriosis: A critical epidemiologic review. Best Practice and Research Clinical Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 51, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.06.001
67.
SimoensS.HummelshojL.D’HoogheT. (2007). Endometriosis: Cost estimates and methodological perspective. Human Reproduction Update, 13(4), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmm010
68.
SloanM.BosleyM.BlaneM.HollowayL.BarrereC.D’CruzD.WaliaC.NaughtonF.HowardP.SuttonS.GordonC. (2021). ‘But you don’t look sick’: A qualitative analysis of the LUPUS UK online forum. Rheumatology International, 41(4), 721–732. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04726-x
69.
SloanM.NaughtonF.HarwoodR.LeverE.D’CruzD.SuttonS.WaliaC.HowardP.GordonC. (2020). Is it me? The impact of patient–physician interactions on lupus patients’ psychological well-being, cognition and health-care-seeking behaviour. Rheumatology Advances in Practice, 4(2), Article rkaa037. https://doi.org/10.1093/rap/rkaa037
70.
SoucieK.SamardzicT.SchramerK.LyC.KatzmanR. (2021). The diagnostic experiences of women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) in Ontario, Canada. Qualitative Health Research, 31(3), 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732320971235
71.
StaigerT. O.JarvikJ. G.DeyoR. A.MartinB.BraddockC. H.,III. (2005). Brief report: Patient-physician agreement as a predictor of outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20(10), 935–937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0175.x
72.
StarfieldB.WrayC.HessK.GrossR.BirkP. S.D’LugoffB. C. (1981). The influence of patient-practitioner agreement on outcome of care. American Journal of Public Health, 71(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.71.2.127
73.
StreetR. L.,Jr.HaidetP. (2011). How well do doctors know their patients? Factors affecting physician understanding of patients’ health beliefs. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 26(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1453-3
74.
ThompsonS. C.PittsJ. S. (1992). In sickness and in health: Chronic illness, marriage, and spousal caregiving. In SpacapanS.OskampS. (Eds.), Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies (pp. 115–151). Sage Publications.
75.
TwohigH.MitchellC.MallenC.AdebajoA.MathersN. (2015). “I suddenly felt I’d aged”: A qualitative study of patient experiences of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). Patient Education and Counseling, 98(5), 645–650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2014.12.013
76.
WortmanC. B.LehmanD. R. (1985). Reactions to victims of life crises: Support attempts that fail. In SamsonI. G.SamsonB. R. (Eds.), Social support: Theory, research and applications (pp. 498–516). Martinus Nijhoff.
77.
WrenG.MercerJ. (2021). Dismissal, distrust, and dismay: A phenomenological exploration of young women’s diagnostic experiences with endometriosis and subsequent support. Journal of Health Psychology, 27(11), 2549–2565. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053211059387
78.
YoungK.FisherJ.KirkmanM. (2020). Partners instead of patients: Women negotiating power and knowledge within medical encounters for endometriosis. Feminism and Psychology, 30(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353519826170
79.
ZaleM.LambertE.LaNoueM. D.LeaderA. E. (2020). Shedding light on endometriosis: Patient and provider perspectives on a challenging disease. Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders, 12(2), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/2284026520905239
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
