A person-centered approach to goal-setting, involving collaboration between patients and health professionals, is advocated in policy to support self-management. However, this is difficult to achieve in practice, reducing the potential effectiveness of self-management support. Drawing on observations of consultations between patients and health professionals, we examined how goal-setting is shaped in patient–provider interactions. Analysis revealed three distinct interactional styles. In controlled interactions, health professionals determine patients’ goals based on biomedical reference points and present these goals as something patients should do. In constrained interactions, patients are invited to present goals, yet health professionals’ language and questions orientate goals toward biomedical issues. In flexible interactions, patients and professionals both contribute to goal-setting, as health professionals use less directive language, create openings, and allow patients to decide on their goals. Findings suggest that interactional style of health professionals could be the focus of interventions when aiming to increase the effectiveness of goal-setting.
AudetM.DumasA.BinetteR.DionneI. (2017). Lifestyle inequalities: Explaining socioeconomic differences in preventive practices of clinically overweight women after menopause. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 1541–1552. doi:10.1177/1049732317715246
BarlowJ.WrightC.SheasbyJ.TurnerA.HainsworthJ. (2002). Self-management approaches for people with chronic conditions: A review. Patient Education and Counseling, 48, 177–187. doi:10.1016/S0738-3991(02)00032-0
5.
BarnardR. A.CruiceM. N.PlayfordE. D. (2010). Strategies used in the pursuit of achievability during goal setting in rehabilitation. Qualitative Health Research, 20, 239–250. doi:10.1177/1049732309358327
6.
BlakemanT.BowerP.ReevesD.Chew-GrahamC. (2010). Bringing self-management into clinical view: A qualitative study of long-term condition management in primary care consultations. Chronic Illness, 6, 136–150. doi:10.1177/1742395309358333
7.
BodenheimerT.HandleyM. A. (2009). Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: An exploration and status report. Patient Education and Counseling, 76, 174–180. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.001
8.
BodenheimerT.LorigK.HolmanH.GrumbachK. (2002). Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. Journal of the American Medical Association, 288, 2469–2475. doi:10.1001/jama.288.19.2469
9.
BurtJ.AbelG.ElmoreN.CampbellJ.RolandM.BensonJ.SilvermanJ. (2014). Assessing communication quality of consultations in primary care: Initial reliability of the Global Consultation Rating Scale, based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide to the Medical Interview. BMJ Open, 4, Article e004339. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004339
10.
ChatwinJ.KennedyA.FirthA.PoveyA.RogersA.SandersC. (2014). How potentially serious symptom changes are talked about and managed in COPD clinical review consultations: A micro-analysis. Social Science & Medicine, 113, 120–136. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.04.048
11.
CoulterA.EntwistleV. A.EcclesA.RyanS.ShepperdS.PereraR. (2015). Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions. Cochrane Library, 2015(3), Article CD010523. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010523
12.
DubbinL. A.ChangJ. S.ShimJ. K. (2013). Cultural health capital and the interactional dynamics of patient-centered care. Social Science & Medicine, 93, 113–120. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.06.014
13.
EllisJ.BogerE.LatterS.KennedyA.JonesF.FosterC.DemainS. (2017). Conceptualisation of the “good” self-manager: A qualitative investigation of stakeholder views on the self-management of long-term health conditions. Social Science & Medicine, 176, 25–33. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.01.018
14.
EntwistleV.CribbA. (2013). Enabling people to live well. London: The Health Foundation.
15.
FranklinM.LewisS.WillisK.Bourke-TaylorH.SmithL. (2017). Patients’ and healthcare professionals’ perceptions of self-management support interactions: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis. Chronic Illness. Advamce online publication. doi:10.1177/1742395317710082
16.
HandbergC.ThorneS.MidtgaardJ. Vinther NielsenC.LomborgK. (2015). Revisiting symbolic interactionism as a theoretical framework beyond the grounded theory tradition. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1023–1032. doi:10.1177/1049732314554231
17.
HeritageJ.MaynardD. (2006). Problems and prospects in the study of physician-patient interaction: 30 years of research. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 351–374. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.32.082905.093959
18.
HuntA. W.Le DorzeG.PolatajkoH.BottariC.DawsonD. R. (2015). Communication during goal-setting in brain injury rehabilitation: What helps and what hinders?British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 78, 488–498. doi:10.1177/0308022614562784
19.
HuntA.W.Le DorzeG.TrenthamB.PolatajkoH.DawsonD. (2015). Elucidating a goal-setting continuum in brain injury rehabilitation. Qualitative Health Research, 25, 1044–1055. doi:10.1177/1049732315588759
20.
Ijas-KallioT.RuusuvuoriJ.PerakylaA. (2010). Patient resistance towards diagnosis in primary care: Implications for concordance. Health, 14, 505–522. doi:10.1177/1363459309360798
21.
LenzenS. A.DaniëlsR.van BokhovenM. A.van der WeijdenT.BeurskensA. (2015). Setting goals in chronic care: Shared decision making as self-management support by the family physician. European Journal of General Practice, 21(2), 1–7. doi:10.3109/13814788.2014.973844
22.
LevackW. M.DeanS. G.SiegertR. J.McPhersonK. M. (2011). Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: How clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Education and Counseling, 85, 206–213. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.01.011
23.
LindströmA.WeatherallA. (2015). Orientations to epistemics and deontics in treatment discussions. Journal of Pragmatics, 78, 39–53. doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2015.01.005
24.
LockeE. A.LathamG. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting & task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
LorigK. R.HolmanH. R. (2003). Self-management education: History, definition, outcomes, and mechanisms. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 26(1), 1–7. doi:10.1207/S15324796ABM2601_01
26.
MacDonaldW.RogersA.BlakemanT.BowerP. (2008). Practice nurses and the facilitation of self-management in primary care. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 622, 191–199. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04585.x
27.
MorganH. M.EntwistleV. A.CribbA.ChristmasS.OwensJ.SkeaZ. C.WattI. S. (2017). We need to talk about purpose: A critical interpretive synthesis of health and social care professionals’ approaches to self-management support for people with long-term conditions. Health Expectations, 20, 243–259. doi:10.1111/hex.12453
28.
MudgeS.KayesN.McPhersonK. (2015). Who is in control? Clinicians’ view on their role in self-management approaches: A qualitative metasynthesis. BMJ Open, 5(5), Article e007413. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007413
29.
OngB.RogersA.KennedyA.BowerP.SandersT.MordenA.. . . StevensonF. (2014). Behaviour change and social blinkers? The role of sociology in trials of self-management behaviour in chronic conditions. Sociology of Health and Illness, 36, 226–238. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12113
30.
ParryR. H. (2004). Communication during goal-setting in physiotherapy treatment sessions. Clinical Rehabilitation, 18, 668–682. doi:10.1191/0269215504cr745oa
31.
PulvirentiM.McMillanJ.LawnS. (2014). Empowerment, patient centred care and self-management. Health Expectations, 17, 303–310. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00757.x
32.
QuirkA.ChaplinR.LelliottP.SealeC. (2012). How pressure is applied in shared decisions about antipsychotic medication: A conversation analytic study of psychiatric outpatient consultations. Sociology of Health and Illness, 34, 95–113. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01363.x
33.
RitholzM. D.BeverlyE. A.BrooksK. M.AbrahamsonM. J.WeingerK. (2014). Barriers and facilitators to self-care communication during medical appointments in the United States for adults with type 2 diabetes. Chronic Illness, 10, 303–313. doi:10.1177/1742395314525647
34.
RobertsonM.MoirJ.SkeltonJ.DowellJ.CowanS. (2011). When the business of sharing treatment decisions is not the same as shared decision making: A discourse analysis of decision sharing in general practice. Health, 15, 78–95. doi:10.1177/1363459309360788
35.
ScamblerS.NewtonP.AsimakopoulouK. (2014). The context of empowerment and self-care within the field of diabetes. Health, 18, 545–560. doi:10.1177/1363459314524801
36.
SchoebV. (2014). Assumptions embedded in wh-questions: An interactional approach to the analysis of goal setting. Studies in Communication Sciences, 14, 68–77. doi:10.1016/j.scoms.2014.03.003
37.
SpradleyJ. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.
38.
StenbergN.FurnessP. (2016). Living well with a long-term condition: Service users’ perspectives of a self-management intervention. Qualitative Health Research, 27, 547–558. doi:10.1177/1049732316628834
39.
StiversT. (2005). Non-antibiotic treatment recommendations: Delivery formats and implications for parent resistance. Social Science & Medicine, 60, 949–964. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.06.040
40.
Ten HaveP. (2007). Doing conversation analysis: A practical guide (Introducing qualitative methods) (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
41.
ThilleP.WardN.RussellG. (2014). Self-management support in primary care: Enactments, disruptions, and conversational consequences. Social Science & Medicine, 108, 97–105. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.02.041
42.
vandeBovenkampH. M.DwarswaardJ. (2017). The complexity of shaping self-management in daily practice. Health Expectations, 20, 952–960. doi:10.1111/hex.12536
43.
VermuntN.HarmsenM.ElwynG.WestertG.BurgersJ.Olde RikkertM.FaberM. (2018). A three-goal model for patients with multimorbidity: A qualitative approach. Health Expectations, 21, 528–538. doi:10.1111/hex.12647
World Health Organisation. (2004). A glossary of terms for community health care and services for older persons (WHO Centre for Health Development Ageing and Health Technical Report Volume 5). Japan: Author. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/68896
