Clinician–Patient Relationships in Virtual Care: A Dimensional Analysis of the Symbolic World of Cancer Care

Abstract

Rapid uptake of telehealth technologies has shifted clinician–patient relationships, a well-studied topic of sociological inquiry. The purpose of this dimensional analysis study was to understand the symbolic interaction of clinicians and patients within virtual supportive cancer care. Seventeen clinicians, eighteen patients, and three care partners receiving or providing care at a multi-site cancer center in the United States participated in interviews. Our analysis of supportive cancer care experiences reveals a key tension: clinicians need to rely on patients in order to share clinical tasks in a virtual care setting but can be reluctant to do so. We posit that dimming the light on cancer is a process that enables clinicians to overcome their reluctance to engage in clinician–patient task sharing by strengthening the relationship. Taken together, these findings reconceptualize the symbolic interaction of the clinician–patient relationship and highlight opportunities to actualize models of relationship-centered virtual care. We discuss implications for clinical practice, ethical relational care, and the literature on clinician–patient relationships and trust.

Keywords

virtual care telehealth cancer supportive care clinician–patient relationships dimensional analysis United States

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Archer

Holch

Armes

Calman

Foster

Gelcich

MacLennan

S. J.

Absolom

(2020). “No turning back” psycho-oncology in the time of COVID-19: Insights from a survey of UK professionals. Psycho-Oncology, 29(9), 1430–1435. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5486

Arora

N. K.

(2003). Interacting with cancer patients: The significance of physicians’ communication behavior. Social Science and Medicine, 57(5), 791–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00449-5

Asare

Fakhoury

Thompson

Culakova

Kleckner

A. S.

Adunlin

Reifenstein

Benavidez

G. A.

Kamen

C. S.

(2020). The patient-provider relationship: Predictors of Black/African American cancer patients’ perceived quality of care and health outcomes. Health Communication, 35(10), 1289–1294. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1625006

Beach

M. C.

Keruly

Moore

R. D.

(2006). Is the quality of the patient-provider relationship associated with better adherence and health outcomes for patients with HIV? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(6), 661–665. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00399.x

Blumer

(1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.

Boyer

C. A.

Lutfey

K. E.

(2010). Examining critical health policy issues within and beyond the clinical encounter: Patient-provider relationships and help-seeking behaviors. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 51(1_suppl), S80–S93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146510383489

Brennan

Barnes

Calnan

Corrigan

Dieppe

Entwistle

(2013). Trust in the health-care provider-patient relationship: Ansystematic mapping review of the evidence base. International Journal for Quality in Health Care: Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 25(6), 682–688. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzt063

Calnan

Rowe

(2006). Researching trust relations in health care: Conceptual and methodological challenges--Introduction. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 20(5), 349–358. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777260610701759

Calton

B. A.

Rabow

M. W.

Branagan

Dionne-Odom

J. N.

Parker Oliver

Bakitas

M. A.

Fratkin

M. D.

Lustbader

Jones

C. A.

Ritchie

C. S.

(2019). Top ten tips palliative care clinicians should know about telepalliative care. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 22(8), 981–985. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2019.0278

10.

Cerier

Beal

E. W.

Chakedis

Chen

Paredes

Sun

Cloyd

J. M.

Pawlik

T. M.

(2018). Patient-provider relationships and health outcomes among hepatopancreatobiliary patients. The Journal of Surgical Research, 228, 290–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.03.026

11.

Chamberlain-Salaun

Mills

Usher

(2013). Linking symbolic interactionism and grounded theory methods in a research design: From Corbin and Strauss’ assumptions to action. SAGE Open, 3(3), 215824401350575. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013505757

12.

Charmaz

(2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage.

13.

Chua

I. S.

Jackson

Kamdar

(2020). Webside manner during the COVID-19 pandemic: Maintaining human connection during virtual visits. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 23(11), 1507–1509. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0298

14.

Conlon

Timonen

Elliott-O’Dare

O’Keeffe

Foley

(2020). Confused about theoretical sampling? Engaging theoretical sampling in diverse grounded theory studies. Qualitative Health Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732319899139

15.

Corbin

Strauss

(2015). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.

16.

Emanuel

E. J.

Emanuel

L. L.

(1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. Jama, 267(16), 2221–2226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03480160079038

17.

Evered

Andersen

Foxwell

Iroegbu

Whitney

(2022). The impact and implications of virtual supportive cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Integrating patient and clinician perspectives. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 30(12), 9945–9952. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07393-9

18.

Farin

Nagl

(2013). The patient-physician relationship in patients with breast cancer: Influence on changes in quality of life after rehabilitation. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 22(2), 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0151-5

19.

Giddens

(1991). Modernity and self-identity. Polity Press.

20.

Glaser

B. G.

(1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445. https://doi.org/10.2307/798843

21.

Graneheim

Lundman

(2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001

22.

Grob

Darien

Meyers

(2019). Why physicians should trust in patients. JAMA, 321(14), 1347–1348. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.1500

23.

Haber

S. G.

Wensky

S. G.

McCall

N. T.

(2017). Reducing inpatient hospital and emergency room utilization among nursing home residents. Journal of Aging and Health, 29(3), 510–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264316641074

24.

Halldorsdottir

(2008). The dynamics of the nurse–patient relationship: Introduction of a synthesized theory from the patient’s perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 22(4), 643–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6712.2007.00568.x

25.

Handberg

Thorne

Midtgaard

Nielsen

C. V.

Lomborg

(2015). Revisiting symbolic interactionism as a theoretical framework beyond the grounded theory tradition. Qualitative Health Research, 25(8), 1023–1032. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314554231

26.

Have

(1991). In Boden

Zimmerman

(eds.), Talk and social structure. Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 138–163). Polity Press.

27.

Johansen

M. L.

Holtedahl

K. A.

Davidsen

A. S.

Rudebeck

C. E.

(2012). “I deal with the small things”: The doctor-patient relationship and professional identity in GPs’ stories of cancer care. Health (United Kingdom), 16(6), 569–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459312438565

28.

Kools

McCarthy

Durham

Robrecht

(1996). Dimensional analysis: Broadening the conception of grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 6(3), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239600600302

29.

Lee

C. T.

Vanderwater

Pickrell

Wong

J. C.

(2020). The association among cancer patients’ collaboration with their healthcare providers, self-management and well-being during radiotherapy: An observational, cross-sectional survey. European Journal of Cancer Care, 29(6), e13308. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13308

30.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

31.

Maddigan

S. L.

Majumdar

S. R.

Johnson

J. A.

(2005). Understanding the complex associations between patient–provider relationships, self-care behaviours, and health-related quality of life in type 2 diabetes: A structural equation modeling approach. Quality of Life Research, 14(6), 1489–1500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-0586-z

32.

Måseide

(1991). Possibly abusive, often benign, and always necessary. On power and domination in medical practice. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(4), 545–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10843655

33.

Milliken

P. J.

Schreiber

(2012). Examining the nexus between grounded theory and symbolic interactionism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(5), 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940691201100510

34.

Morgan

(2020). A dimensional analysis of inner strength in people aging with serious illness. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 60(1), 286–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.196

35.

Morse

J. M.

(1991). Negotiating commitment and involvement in the nurse‐patient relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 16(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1991.tb03436.x

36.

Morse

J. M.

(2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501

37.

Murray

McCrone

(2015). An integrative review of promoting trust in the patient-primary care provider relationship. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 71(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12502

38.

Nolan

M. R.

Davies

Brown

Keady

Nolan

(2004). Beyond “person-centred” care: A new vision for gerontological nursing. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13(3 A), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.00926.x

39.

Pappas

Seale

(2009). The opening phase of telemedicine consultations: An analysis of interaction. Social Science and Medicine, 68(7), 1229–1237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.01.011

40.

Pellegrino

E. D.

(1979). Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 4(1), 32–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/4.1.32

41.

Phillips-Salimi

C. R.

Haase

J. E.

Kooken

W. C.

(2012). Connectedness in the context of patient-provider relationships: A concept analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(1), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05763.x

42.

Potter

S. J.

McKinlay

J. B.

(2005). From a relationship to encounter: An examination of longitudinal and lateral dimensions in the doctor-patient relationship. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 61(2), 465–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.067

43.

Samuel

C. A.

Mbah

Schaal

Eng

Black

K. Z.

Baker

Ellis

K. R.

Guerrab

Jordan

Lightfoot

A. F.

Robertson

L. B.

Yongue

C. M.

Cykert

(2020). The role of patient-physician relationship on health-related quality of life and pain in cancer patients. Supportive Care in Cancer: Official Journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 28(6), 2615–2626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05070-y

44.

Sansom-Daly

U. M.

Bradford

(2020). Grappling with the “human” problem hiding behind the technology: Telehealth during and beyond COVID-19. Psycho-Oncology, 29(9), 1404–1408. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5462

45.

Schatzman

(1991). Dimensional analysis: Notes on an alternative approach to the grounding of theory in qualitative research. In Maines

D. R.

(Ed.), Social Organization and Social Process, p. (303–314).

46.

Smith

S. D.

Nicol

K. M.

Devereux

Cornbleet

M. A.

(1999). Encounters with doctors: Quantity and quality. Palliative Medicine, 13(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1191/026921699668267830

47.

Sousa-Duarte

Brown

Mendes

A. M.

(2020). Healthcare professionals’ trust in patients: A review of the empirical and theoretical literature. Sociology Compass, 14(10), e12828. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12828

48.

Thomas

Magilvy

J. K.

(2011). Qualitative rigor or research validity in qualitative research. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 16(2), 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6155.2011.00283.x

49.

Thorne

S. E.

Kuo

Armstrong

E.-A.

McPherson

Harris

S. R.

Hislop

T. G.

(2005). “Being known”: Patients’ perspectives of the dynamics of human connection in cancer care. Psycho-Oncology, 14(10), 887–900. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.945

50.

Thorne

S. E.

Robinson

C. A.

(1988). Health care relationships: The chronic illness perspective. Research in Nursing and Health, 11(5), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770110504

51.

Timmermans

(2020). The engaged patient: The relevance of patient–physician communication for twenty-first-century health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 61(3), 259–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146520943514

52.

van der Lee

M. L.

Schellekens

M. P. J.

(2020). Bridging the distance: Continuing psycho-oncological care via video-consults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psycho-Oncology, 29(9), 1421–1423. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5468

53.

Whitney

Canale

Zinck

(2022). Toward transformative engagement: Ethical and effective clinical-research partnerships in cancer care nursing. Cancer Care Research Online, 2(3), e021. https://doi.org/10.1097/CR9.0000000000000021

54.

Whitney

Evered

J. A.

(2022). The qualitative research distress protocol: A participant-centered tool for navigating distress during data collection. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 160940692211103. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221110317

55.

Whittemore

Chase

S. K.

Mandle

C. L.

(2001). Validity in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 522–537. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973201129119299

56.

Wilk

A. S.

Platt

J. E.

(2016). Measuring physicians’ trust: A scoping review with implications for public policy. Social Science and Medicine (1982), 165, 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.039

57.

Wylie

J. L.

Wagenfeld-Heintz

(2004). Development of relationship-centered care. Journal for Healthcare Quality: Official Publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality, 26(1), 14–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1945-1474.2004.tb00467.x